Very good article
I just want to say thanks to Kieren for really putting out on this one.
2726 publicly visible posts • joined 27 Apr 2007
I can guess that the company doesn't want the contract and regrets taking it. Perhaps Tor is not as easy a target as was assumed. This case is probably going to be an expensive one as it is dealing with the breaking of a government contract. As far as lawyers fees are concerned, is $150K a lot?
. . . the only thing coming out of the exit node is going to be the nice clean, harmless traffic from people accessing legal websites but don't want to be spied upon while doing so.
Indeed, one of the popular sites on the dark web is now Facebook which is accessible at https://facebookcorewwwi.onion/
The police are hired to uphold the law, not make it. When they step over that line and try to influence what is currently legal, then we have a serious problem. I bet they'd like to see a curfew so it will be easier to monitor who's prowling about at night. How close are we to that being a reality? This affair shows that we are probably closer than most people think.
Although this worries me I don't think it is all bad. It's inevitable that governments want to get involved with bitcoin, but this is just the beginning and at least it will offer some kind of protection, or discouragement of bad behaviour. I'm more worried about what comes next.
Another example of what happens when brainless marketing-bots get their grubby hands on a nice well-defined engineering term.
Actually, it's worse than that. After the brainless marketing-bots get through with the term, the brainless politicians get to have a go at it. Here in Canada politicians bragging about our infrastructure use the term simply to differentiate from dialup. That means that a 1.5mbps rural wireless is called broadband despite the actual government mandate of 5mbps to qualify.
"The majority noted that automated systems are able to account for fair use before sending out takedown notices, ..."
How the heck can they believe that?
Because they're sleazebags just like the Universal Music Group who claimed that:
"fair use" was something others would need to use to argue against a takedown notice
Actually, sleazebags doesn't even begin to describe a company with such an outstanding lack of social concience.
Google may only have a third of the search business there, but they still have some real advantages. They're also serious about their expansion and were the first to put servers in Russia in response to the new data sovereignty laws. I can see how Yandex feels threatened despite currently being in the lead. Regardless, current western sanctions may well be a disadvantage to Google right now.
@ Tom Samplonius: Microsoft is addressing it by planning to store all the information for Office365 (for instance) in Toronto and Quebec by 2016. Actually we have relevant laws going back to 1986 and the newer Bill S-4 is not only relevant now, but also likely to get some stronger amendments in the near future.
Mexico, Chile, Brazil, and Argentina are discussing this seriously as well and will likely pass relevant laws soon. In the EU, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is developing fast now and will effect all member states. But most notable is the fact that Germany, Switzerland, China, Canada, and Australia already have similar laws in place.
Tor – aka The Onion Router
Tor is just Tor. It doesn't stand for anything any more.
It is used by whistleblowers, journalists, activists, crooks and lowlifes. All connections leaving the Tor network go through these exit points, which will inevitably carry a lot of traffic that the Feds will be interested in.
In fact it is used by anybody who wants to. The Feds are interested in e-mail, phone calls, and basically any traffic. Tor is not unique in this regard. One can, like with anything that one doesn't know about, make assumptions about what actual traffic is going through Tor and how much of it is related to illegal activity. Mostly because of the nature of the Tor network, there is no data available on traffic content, though several authors with dubious intent have tried to paint the situation as being whatever their paranoid minds can imagine. They don't, however, have scientific credibility. The Tor network itself is neutral, and that in itself is something that does not sit well with the current government.
I don't think it's reasonable. The number of people running software (installed by them or part of an application or OS) is ever increasing. People using random MAC addresses could get wrongly accused, and false positives will only increase over time as people or software suppliers become more privacy concious. This is a bad idea because it is based on a false premise. It is reminiscent of the boneheads who insist that an IP address represents an unique user or geographical location. They're in denial because the truth would expose the basic fallacy upon which their "idea" depends.
"[This] clearly makes it difficult as possible for a corporation to put together a response for concerned users," Cluley says.
Should that not read "an unconcerned corporation to put together a response for concerned users"? Sorry if it's inconvenient, but after all this is the work they get paid for.
The Justice Department and FBI officials are indeed powerful, but that doesn't mean they can always do whatever they like. Apple and the tech sector have significant power as well and there could be some heavy backlash for anybody that would take them on. This brings to mind an old saying about suing a newspaper, never piss off anybody that buys ink by the gallon.
"You know ... personally, I watched, "Sicko," by Michael Moore, and I can't fathom why there wasn't another civil war on the back of that film alone."
I haven't seen it, but can well imagine what you're talking about. The thing is though, people have long since given up and instead pursue other interests like entertainment and gluttony. I bet if you ran the presidential elections on one channel while simultaneously airing football playoffs on the other, one of them wouldn't get a lot viewers.
"There are several videos of it or its prototype online."
And a good thing too. El Reg videos never play for me.
We're getting off topic here, but I couldn't leave this alone:
"Most people don't know that modern refrigerators are now filled with masses of explosive gas"
There aren't masses of explosive gas. It's a limited quantity and it's limited to an amount that when mixed with the quantity of air in a small kitchen will not form an explosive mixture. Propane, you see, will not ignite unless the gas/air mixture is within the flammability range which in this case is quite narrow. So, pure propane won't ignite, and nor will a thin mixture. Other flammable gasses like acetylene have a very wide flammability range and therefore are quite dangerous. Propane, in the quantities used in fridges, is not dangerous. (See Wikipedia: Flammability limit)
"... of course most consumers have shown they've no idea about this stuff by failing to install much-needed new broadband router firmware despite colossal security holes."
Is it that they have no idea, or is it that they have a different idea? I suspect that many consumers actually have a good idea. They think that when they buy a product it is finished and ready for them to use. The idea that it's simply a proof of concept and a work in progress does not enter their minds - and I can't say I blame them.
Has anybody here actually measured the output of any of these commercial wifi routers where the power is programmable? I've got a number of them here and it doesn't look like there is much increase in output when the software numbers are increased. It certainly doesn't look linear. In other words it may say milliwatt, but doubling the number does not double the output. Checking output from one radio to the other, and I see very little increase in signal received. Also, practical experience with any transmitter would tell you that output is very much limited by the hardware and the output stage will simply burn out when pushed very much beyond it's intended power.
So. Anybody have any real numbers on the actual dBm increases we're talking about here?
I'd say you need a believable story. First, your laptop with banking details gets stolen . . . etc. etc. Unfortunately most countries have about a $10 thousand dollar cash or transaction limit at which point the bank is legally obliged to make a report. That one is going to be difficult to get around. So worth it or not, I can't see how you can get away with a large amount.
And that's not good. Perhaps better to teach them to turn away when confronted with inappropriate behaviour. In fact, teaching them that not every app or web site is really important and that there are other choices would be a better idea.
I too have given up on it from an editing point of view. There are just too many "editors" with no respect for useful and verifiable information.
That said, I do use use Wikipedia a lot, but then I have a sceptical disposition and a very active bullshit meter. And that's something which is sorely lacking in a very large number of people. Seriously, would you take a Wikipedia entry about a political personality at face value? I really, really, hope not.
Andrew is right though, this anonymity has got to go. It is a very important principle on the internet, but it's neither practical nor useful to Wikipedia.
I'm having a hard time seeing it that way. If we must use that comparison then I'd say it's more like the other way around. Didn't Capitalism lose a point by being reigned in by new data sovereignty laws? Didn't Freedom win a point by striking a blow against those who would take our freedoms away?
The US is actively forcing Russia and China to form some kind of alliance. That's a big piece of the world and not a good idea.
Analysts say the regional chest-beating is a challenge to US dominance in Asia and an attempt to cause Washington to choose between losing influence or confronting the Beijing.
Confrontation won't work. The smart thing would be to get rid of the egotistical psychology and simply accept the reality the US is not going to be able to achieve total world domination. In the end, cooperation always gets you further.