Re: Esc
'attacked with Vim"
and vigour
2726 publicly visible posts • joined 27 Apr 2007
The tradeoff is it will be a more attractive experience for pedestrians.
And deer. Lots of those on the road during parts of the year here. If you slow down and wait at a respectful distance, they just assume you've stopped. So there you are. If you don't want to wait so long, then you need to drive right up to them so they see you as a threat. That kind of psychology is not so easy to program.
I'm thinking that the city experience won't be that different. People will stand in the street and finish their conversation before moving over for these meek cars to pass. This sort of thing will make the travel time unpredictable so you can't use these self-driving cars for commuting unless you're prepared to start an hour early, just in case.
"You could have doors that auto shut, unless physically put in a locked open position. The locks themselves would never have a "latch" position, defaulting to lock on closure."
How many doors do people have that it would be worth doing that in case you forgot one? Seriously, I live in an old building with seven outside doors. That's really unusual, but I keep most of them locked and the front and back door are locked and unlocked as needed. I can't imagine someone not being able to keep track and simply locking a few doors when they go out or to bed.
"I don't really understand this - there are very few people left who don't have a mobile phone already (the only one I can think of out of everyone I know/meet is my mother-in-law) so why would you need to buy another?"
I was not entirely truthful, but rather using a literary shortcut. I do actually have several cell phones in my parts pile. The problem is that, like a surprising number of places outside of cities, there is no coverage here. The point is that a 2fa implementation needs to be available to everybody and not just people who live in cities. As we see from the responses above, there are ways to accomplish this and it is just a matter of services adopting them.
And lots of people don't even have a cellphone, let along get a signal. Seriously, if a site or service cannot come up with something that works for everybody without having to purchase additional equipment and services they should be questioning their ability to develop security solutions for themselves.
Nice post lukewarmdog.
"What happens when you add ethics is that the car decides your lifestyle is impure."
This is what is happening now. People's choices are being taken over by overzealous and misinformed corporate marketers - from my perspective, evil. It is imperative that people take control and ownership of the technology they use and that it not dictate their choices. I am reminded of this quote by Napoleon Bonaparte: "Nothing is more difficult, and therefore more precious, than to be able to decide."
A class action law suit by users of these devices would cover older models just fine. My non-lawyer thinking suggests that being put at risk without any warning labels would make a case. I want to see these socially irresponsible companies put out of business. I'm sure there are others willing and able to take their place.
Don't know about "custom router". Sounds like you're doing the hardware too. I'm sure that can have advantages, especially with the low power consumption computers like Raspberry Pi and such. However, lots of off-the-shelf routers support Linux. I've never had to run the proprietary software on my home routers, choosing instead to install Tomato immediately upon getting the device. My main router is currently an older Asus RT N-16. Has lots of memory for extra stuff too.
The buck stops right there, and that's probably the problem in most cases. Servers have been capable for a long time, and most operating systems within the last 10 years have supported it out of the box. That leaves a few very old consumer routers and the ISP - who is really the culprit in the slowness of this transition.
PS: No, I can't change ISP because there isn't another one offering service where I live. That's probably the case in most of North America.
Propane is a direct drop-in for R12 and you can use it safely in your car. See here. Lots of people are doing it. A licensed person probably can't do it, but you can do it yourself or use an intermediate refrigerant to circumvent the law - this will depend on country.
There is a lot of FUD on this topic. I suspect that it is both political and emotional. I note that the ones crying fire/danger are not generally experts and in fact refrigerative engineers think propane (sold as R290) is just fine. Here is an article from actual experts: Propane as R22-Replacement in Commercial Appliances
What the FUDsters (fudtards?) don't seem to know is the basics. Propane has a very narrow flammability limit. In fact 2.15 and 9.6% of the total propane/air mixture must be propane in order for it to be combustible. If you are outside of this range, it won't burn. It is an exceptionally safe gas. Appliance engineers calculate the amount of propane in a refrigerator and look at what mixture you would get in a small kitchen if all the propane got out at once. This would be an extremely rare event but even then you could not have a fire or explosion because there is not enough propane to make a flammable mixture.
I'm thinking that there might be some economic and control issues somewhere in the supply chain regarding traditional refrigerants. Bringing up the fear of fire and explosion is an effective way to stop people considering this gas - even though the scientific facts show them to be lying.
Major US-based providers like Google and Yahoo! store a customer’s email content across an ever-changing mix of facilities around the world.
I've chosen to not use those services and instead opt for a private service which suits my taste. It is a fallacy that users have no control. That would imply that they cannot chose what company they use. Which is wrong.
@Kurt Meyer I think you didn't catch the gist. Of course there are loonies everywhere and I completely understand your message. However, you may not have noticed, like I have, the number of posts on DNS forums and IRC looking for alternatives to ICANN because they are afraid that the UN will censor sites talking about guns. Do you really think this is not remarkable? My comment was not a generalised one but targeted directly at DNS interests which is the topic of this article.
"Agreed, but the bad news is that there's more than enough kit out there to cause havoc and little if any means to get it cleaned up."
Cleaning up what's there may indeed take a long time. But surely there are a few key manufacturers of this kit who could be sued and prevented from continuing the situation. If not a class action suit, then publicly shaming of the these charlatans is at least a possibility. Other consumer devices are required to meet certain basic safety standards. I see no reason why the same principles wouldn't apply here.