Re: Never mind the physics
Nah - it's too cold. All the water is frozen solid so where would you put the laser-toting sharks?
The sharks have frikkin' lasers, so they keep their own swimming pool melted.
2493 publicly visible posts • joined 27 Apr 2007
I have received an email from ops. "We do have ad policies that prohibit pop-ups and are strict on user-initiated overlays/expandables (and this ad breaks those policies) so I'm attempting to block this particular ad." This is great to hear, thanks very much for the feedback guys. I understand that it's impossible to vet every ad served by the ad provider and that sometimes a pop-up ad might sneak through: the important thing is that you have a sensible policy in place and that you are willing to take action to enforce it. Thanks!
You have a big video pop-up advert which hides the Science page. It happens to be for an S4 but that's not an issue. It pops up on mouse-over of the smaller ad, and the cross-to-close is directly over the smaller ad: this means that when I close the big pop-up, the mouse is still over the smaller ad, so it pops up again, over and over, ad infinitum (pun intended). This is VERY ANNOYING. Even when I did manage to get the pop-up closed and gone eventually, the soundtrack was still playing, from nowhere, which was also VERY ANNOYING. I had to close the browser tab completely to make it stop.
It's one thing to maintain a necessary revenue stream, it's another thing to make the site unusable.
I still want to see a speedy autonomous lunar rover. It will be solar powered, and will drive itself around and around the moon, staying on the sunlit side all the time so it can keep going forever (or at least until some essential moving part wears out).
How fast does it need to be? The moon's circumference is 10,921 km at the equator, and the moon's day is 27.321582 of our Earth days, so that gives a straight-line speed of 16.655 km/h. Let's give it a nice round number and say a steady speed of 20 km/h to allow for course deviations to avoid big craters and mountains. That's not very fast. Way back in 2005 the winner of the DARPA Grand Challenge averaged 30.7 km/h.
The rover can be provided in advance with fairly detailed maps of a preferred route around the moon which avoids all the larger obstacles, so all it needs to do itself is keep an eye out for boulders ahead. It can remember where those boulders are for next time around, and optimise the route. It can then start trying alternate routes. In the event that it gets stuck in a dead end and dusk catches up, it can go into sleep mode and then backtrack the next morning.
I once spent three days searching for elephants (in an area with lots of trees and bushes). I couldn't find them anywhere! The problem was that I was looking for large grey things. Eventually I found them, and they were red, which is why I'd missed them before. Turns out that elephants enjoy coating themselves in mud, and the mud there was red mud. Fail icon is for myself for being so bad at finding the world's largest terrestrial animal.
"To do the same with pulsars, you need to adjust for the wobble of the earth around the sun and the suns local wobble"
The academics have developed software which uses signals from pulsars to calculate the position of the centre of gravity of the solar system. That point doesn't wobble.
Put the same software in a spacecraft and you get the position of the spacecraft. Yes the spacecraft will wobble due to pull from local planets & a slightly wobbling sun, but the whole point is that we know exactly where the spacecraft is, wobbles and all.
Don't worry, all teddy-surgery is performed by qualified specialists.
For anyone who is unsure what twanging about involves, I recommend this educational video (SFW).
Only a little bit around the outside runs off towards the sea. Most Aussie rivers run (when they are not dry) toward the middle because Australia is basically bowl-shaped. The lowest point of the bowl, Lake Eyre, is actually below sea level!
One of the NIAC presentations to NASA was an investigation into (IIRC) using solar sails for this and with a Voyager sized payload they reckoned they could get from Earth to where Voyager is in about 10 years, not 35 to 40 years.
I think I can see an issue with using solar sails: beyond the heliopause they become interstellar-medium sails and the probe gets blown back again. Or way off course. Or somewhere.
Yup, that is just friggin' sad.
Worse still, you're not even allowed intimate contact with your significant other while cross-border rambling.
In that case they are lucky to have got it as far up as they did! Last time I saw footage of a Reliant Robin being launched it didn't end up quite as reliant as intended. Skip to 8:07 for the launch.
Australia seems to be a seriously racist place. I have a friend of Sri Lankan origin whose office nickname in Australia is Apu. The fact that no one bitched about "Wog Boy" is not necessarily a good thing.
You have completely failed to understand the Aussie way. Calling him Apu is a term of endearment: it would be an insult to still be calling him Mr <insert real surname here> after working with him for a long time in the office. Aussies call their best mates things like dickhead and wanker and it's taken as a sign of respect.
I genuinely do feel sorry for the solar energy adopters who will shortly find out that their $60,000 array is just as vulnerable to CME induced power surges as the power grid.
Don't feel sorry for me, my panels are insured along with the rest of my house. (p.s. they only cost a small fraction of $60,000)
Plus for added points, the majority of grid tied systems won't work without mains so even if their solar setup weathers the storm intact they will need to wait until the mains comes back up before they can do anything.
So I'm no worse off than those without panels? That's not a problem.
In countries where traditional telephony was in extensive use, there is always a large infra structure of copper wire between exchanges and subscribers, the so called last mile. The replacement of all that wire would be a daunting and expensive task.
That is exactly what we are doing in Australia: replacing the "last 1.6km" of copper with fibre-to-the-home. It's called the NBN (National Broadband Network). Yes it is expensive (although it could have been done much less expensively if former PM John Howard hadn't privatised Telstra, necessitating buy-back at a huge loss). Yes it is daunting, which might explain why Tony Abbott plans to scrap the whole thing if (when) he wins the upcoming election. But if by some miracle Labor manages to hang on by the skin of its teeth, we will (eventually) get a proper fibre network.