It's "Your Holiness", if we're going to be all formal.
Although I'd have thought he'd be too busy settling in to his new digs to be here.
202 publicly visible posts • joined 3 Nov 2008
I wonder if this is also a result of touch-screens; with a keyboard you (almost always) have buttons to press. With a touch screen there are no actual buttons and so it is not expected that there will be actual motion.
I speak a little in igonrance, not having much chance to play with touch screens recently, except on the photocopier at work which is not quite the same thing.
But yes, it would be nice if people would stick to a consistent use of language for these things.
I would have though that this would be in a very high vacuum, which is perhaps cooled by a liquid helium device: I know the one that I've played with in the past gets quite easily to ~2.7 K with no trouble, and can be lower if you're both lucky and careful.
As it turns out, reading the paper itself, it is an Adiabatic Demagnetisation Refrigerator (ADR) that gets it from ~300K to ~300 mK. This is actually quite a cool method (excuse the pun), especially for one who has a bit of a background with cryogenic stuff. I won't bore you with the details, but NASA have a basic primer here:
http://cryo.gsfc.nasa.gov/introduction/ADR_intro/ADR_intro.html
and something a bit more technical here:
http://cryo.gsfc.nasa.gov/ADR/ADR_primer/ADR_primer.html
which, though a bit space orientated, show the general idea nicely.
The more interesting part I found was, that to disconnect the ADR once it got to 300 mK, they used what is essentially a piece of brass on a rope. I'd have though it would be far more complicated than that.
In this antipodian part of the world, the only ones seem to be Dilmah brand, made of plastic, and are fine until you move them, when the string pulls a hole in the bag, or the vertices rip, filling the cup with leaves (or what passes for tea leaves in a bag).
It wouldn't be so bad, if only they didn't cost upwards of $2 for the cup.
Funny your old man would say that; I learnt to type on a typewriter, but the only residue from that, that I notice, is a preference for the keyboard to be at quite a steep angle.
A do know that my old Imperial 66 typewriter had a couple of pressure settings on the keys: there was a lever that adjusted the tension on the return spring for the keys. It was never as light-touch as something like a laptop keyoard, but it was quite close. The biggest problem seems to be that as you make the spring looser (the keys "softer") the maximum typing speed would go down, as the type didn't come away from the paper quite as fast. This made a trade-off between speed and strength. I almost always went for the soft, since my typing wasn't (as still isn't) very fast at all.
Still, I must agree that the tactile feedback is essential, especially if transcribing something, It is nice to know from touch that the letters are in fact there. This is something that bothers me about the preponderance of flat laptop-style keypads: they don't seem to have enough travel, and the mechanisms don't have a decided "on-off" point; that is, they almost seem to vary a little as one is typing so that what is a sufficient pressure with one key-press is not for another.
You know, I think I'm going to dig out the old typewriter and have a play with it now. Lets see if I can upset the neighbours with the racket of flying metal!
"And, strictly speaking, nuclear power is not renewable either."
In the strictest sense, nothing is renewable or sustainable: eventually the Laws of Thermodynamics tend to catch with anything that is done in this universe. Really it is just a matter of determining what the best wasteful method is. And perhaps that is fossil fuels, perhaps it is electric, perhaps it is merely settling for not transporting stuffs halfway around the world without good reason and not travelling hundreds of kilometres a day just to get to work.
I suppose that it is a thought: my initial impression was "I wonder if the law considers that?".
I know certainly you are not allowed to board the aircraft with a "weapon" --- as I found out when my safety razor had to be put in the hold recently --- but what about weapons that are made in flight?
I'm not a lawyer, but it strikes me as something that would not have been considered by those making the laws. Is there a process for this?
Not that it would seem to change much about the rubber glove, but it is vaguely interesting as a thought experiment.
Anyhow, I'd settle to have a decent cup and plate printed: the cardboard garbage that I've been exposed to recently is appalling.
I'm not sure, but I know that when my father's wife was doing her first-aid for the ambulance service, she was sent home with one to practice with. This may have just been because the fancy new one was left in the ambulance.
Never mind the school, try a University: as an undergrad we were told that we couldn't do one of the experiments as there was no way to get data off of the oscilloscope. The department ended up managing to find dinky 512MB ones, but they cost the earth, and god only knows if they're still available.
And it was only a few weeks ago I found myself having to clear a 1GB drive tthat once held manuals and drivers to do very much the same: anything larger ---even if partitioned/formatted smaller would be "too large" and not work in the scope.
And these aren't even very old machines, at least by lab scope standards: not even ten years old.
Mind you, don't get me started about hoarding old stuffs. The other scope has only HP-IB and a floppy disk drive. To use the floppy disks, I ended up bring in the USB floppy drive from home, that everyone called me mad for getting and then keeping. Right up to the point where my supervisor had to use it to get drivers off of a floppy disk for a rather expensive bit of kit that escapes me right now.
I think it refers to the gears on the face of the 2 pound coin. Why it's on the picture is an entirely different matter. It could be that there is some Scottish academic that is still miffed with the mechanical impossibility of the design on it, but I'm not sure that would explain the interesting grammar (interesting because of the lack of it, mostly).
Whatever happened to amanfromMars, anyhow? Haven't seen him around these parts for some time.
I too was about to say that I'd only ever seen it on Sony equipment, and have only ever seen it on one disc, which I think was Sony, too.
My car radio still has it, too, not that it gets used very often. For fear of damaging the discs most of the originals were copied onto blanks, which then had the CD-TEXT data put on as well. I always wondered why it wasn't taken up by more players and record companies, and still have no good reason other than that, by the time it was getting popular, "soft" music came along and did away completely with the disc anyhow.
Just as a thought, I wonder if the receiver could be built into the remote: so that one only had to tap the remote for all of the negotiation business to occur.
Don't have to leave the sofa, and don't have to fiddle with menus and the like.
More interestingly, I remember the (diesel) ute went in for a service. When the invoice arrived, it clearly said "spark plugs inspected and changed", or something equivalent.
I don't think we were charged for them, but the Service manager had a bit of a splutter trying to explain it when he was asked.
"Couldn't I just have another couple of coffees?"
I imagine that it would have to be a different stuff for a different species: maybe a cup of tea, or some of that fancy imported chocolate that costs a small fortune, but tastes so very good.
Actually, I wonder if it would be possible to pick your diet (or use of material) to specifically kill off a particular species? And what would the implications of that be?