
Dell
Don't forget the Dell adverts that suggest you buy a blue laptop to match your blue sweater (with blue laptop pictured), accompanied by small print that reads, "Available in black, red and pink".
213 publicly visible posts • joined 24 Apr 2007
If you have an infinite number of cats walking over an infinite number of keyboards, they will instantaneously produce an infinite number of copies of the entire works of Shakespeare. Additionally, an infinite number of the cats would not produce anything even remotely Shakespearean.
Mathematically speaking, all cats write Shakespeare and all cats don't, therefore the number of cats in the Universe would be exactly zero. In fact, plus/minus infinity is equal to zero, and therefore everything that exists doesn't actually exist.
Do you still want to try this experiment?
"Many more sophisticated, nah... competent, DNS administrators typically create a wildcard DNS entry that takes you to a 'the site you're looking for doesn't exist, click on this link blah blah blah' page so that you still land on their webserver..."
You have to remember that WWW isn't the only Internet service, and there's no guarantee that clients performing a DNS lookup are looking for a web server in the first place.
-- "The information didn't leave the NHS"
This isn't guaranteed. The spreadsheet was emailed to "another part of the health service" - depending on their definitions, it's entirely possible that the email in question travelled over the Internet, and could therefore have been intercepted at any one of a number of points along the way...
I use Firefox+NoScript as much as the next man, but it's wrong to say that you can't achieve the same thing in IE.
The equivalent functionality is built into IE and does not require any add-ons. Just disable scripting and ActiveX for the Internet Zone and add trusted sites to the Trusted Sites zone. Admittedly, adding sites to Trusted Sites isn't as "two clicks" user friendly as NoScript, but it achieves the same thing.
Like a lot of people, Blu-ray's DRM scares me. At the moment, I can buy a DVD safe in the knowledge that I can play it forever. Even if DVD players go the way of VHS, I can copy the films onto my PC and transcode them into whatever format I want.
With Blu-ray's DRM, things are too uncertain. I have to spend a fortune on equipment and discs to get films that I might not even be able to watch in 10 years' time!
Until Blu-ray's DRM has been cracked as comprehensively as DVD's, I'll be staying well away.
Very sad to hear this. Now I feel really guilty for cancelling my subscription (but hey, times are hard for all of us!)
Fond memories include Guy's many insights (obviously), but I also remember, in my naivety, flicking straight to Tim Nott's Hands-On Windows 95 column to see the latest flashy developments in GUI decadence. If it weren't for Tim, I would never have left 3.1!
PCW will be sadly missed.
The problem with the original BBC Click was not that it involved manipulating the PCs of innocent users without their consent. The real issue is that in purchasing the botnet, they have taken a chunk of licence fee money and poured it directly into the pockets of Russian and Ukrainian criminals.
Of course, the BBC broke the law by accessing the compromised PCs, although it could be argued that they did so in the public interest, and caused no damage.
On the other hand, in buying the botnet, the BBC has funded the real criminals and allowed them to build even bigger botnets with which to carry out their scummy activities.
They would actually have been on (slightly) better ethical ground if they'd written the malware themselves.
I agree 100%.
I'm as anti-DRM as anyone, but in this case far too many commentards have jumped on the "OMGZ DRM!!!11" bandwagon before they've read the article properly.
The anti-cheat systems built into pretty much all online games *can* be restrictive and on rare occasions like this can cause problems for legitimate users, but at the end of the day they are designed and implemented to *protect* the legitimate user from cheats who spoil it for the rest of us.
Anti-cheat systems could certainly be considered a form of DRM, but unlike most DRM it really does provide added value for the average consumer.
I Agree.
I, like many people, read The Register while I'm at work. What I want is a quick flick through the day's technology news at my own pace. I'm not going to be pissing about with headphones and then sitting through some idiot (usually) nattering repetetively and verbosely while some shaky, pixellated crap wobbles on the screen in front of me.
"Video news" = epic FAIL.
Overwrite all of your hard disk once with zeroes, using free software such as Darik's Boot and Nuke.
I guarantee that nobody at Which?, or indeed anyone else will be able to recover a single file.
The hard disks they bought from eBay must have been "erased" with something as trivial as a delete or a format.
"Intel developed the original EFI in a bid to drag the PC out of the 1980s"
I was always under the impression that Intel developed EFI because the Itanic processors couldn't do the x86 real mode that BIOS requires. I really can't see them messing around with it just because BIOS is old. Yes, it is old, but it works, so why change it? Unless you've just developed a retarded processor that can't handle it, of course...
I feel the government is pushing for adoption of electric vehicles too soon. They're just not ready for public consumption yet. They don't yet have the performance and they certainly don't have the necessary recharging infrastructure to make them viable.
Hybrid cars have been a good stepping stone in getting people green-conscious, and the runaway success of the Prius is testament to this. What we should do is build on this. If the rumours are true about the next Prius having a "plug-in" option then this would be the perfect next step. A hybrid car that can use the existing fuel infrastructure exclusively and still get a decent economy, but will also ramp up demand for an EV recharging infrastructure. When this is in place, electric-only vehicles could find mainstream acceptance.
EVs are great, but we're just not there yet. The public and the government should instead be supporting plug-in hybrids - cars that will pave the way for EVs in the future, but are also pratical for use here and now.
Well not me, but my girlfriend. One day she received notification that about £95 had been debited from her PayPal account and credited to Skype. That was odd, because she's never even had a Skype account. Does this make it more of a PayPal problem?
To be fair to PayPal, she did eventually get the money returned.
"Contrary to agreed procedures, an external contractor sent two discs containing details of foreign nationals to the UK Border Agency by normal post when these should have been sent special delivery."
No, no no NO NO!!
The discs should never have been burned.
Have they learnt nothing?
Many, many years ago (so many that I forget how many it was), I found myself buying my first ever CD player. "This is it," I thought. "The future of audio reproduction is here. Vinyl is dead." I was so excited when I got the thing home that I nearly did a shit.
But I'll never forget what my father said to me. "Don't bother with that nonsense," he said, "it'll all be out of date in a couple of years. Solid state is the way to go, just you wait and see. It's all in the memory chips!"
Fast forward many, many years to the present, and people are still repeating the same old lines, just as they have done for years, and just as my dear old papa used to in the long, long ago. But nothing's really changed. OK, I've seen a couple of MP3 singles in HMV on USB flash drives, but no-one's pretending they're anything other than a gimmick.
So for all those who are saying "solid state is the way to" - I'm ready to believe you. But can anyone tell me when they think it's going to happen?