
And...
Don't forget to keep your Junk clean!
213 publicly visible posts • joined 24 Apr 2007
Dave, if the atmosphere is a glass of water, and the CO2 is cyanide, what we're actually talking about here is the difference between drinking a 0.037% concentration of cyanide or manually topping it up to a 0.038% concentration of cyanide.
Of course, the atmosphere is nothing like water and CO2 is nothing like cyanide, which is probably for the best.
Here's another simple observation that could throw a spanner in the works...
In a controlled laboratory mini-arboretum, increasing the concentration of CO2 in the air also increases the rate at which the trees grow. In turn, the Increased rate of tree growth decreases the concentration of CO2 in the air.
A fool could quite easily conclude that increasing levels of man-made CO2 emissions mean that trees and plants will grow more vigorously, and eventually the levels of CO2 in the atmosphere will balance out, while the rate of petroleum generation increases.
Unfortunately for this theory - and for yours - there's a great deal more to science than making a few simple observations then drawing a logical conclusion.
I've had some exposure to 6Music via digital TV, and while I think the content is good enough to be the saviour of radio, I simply don't listen to the radio when I'm at home. Like a lot of people, I listen to the radio in the car and at work. It's no good having 6Music on DAB only - if I'm going to listen to it then it needs to be on proper radio. Stick it on FM - either of Radios 3 & 5 can bugger off right away. Stick Asian Network on FM while you're at it, I'm sure it'll pull the listeners in once it's on a platform people can actually receive.
It's absolutely retarded for the BBC to put 6Music on DAB then complain about listener figures. It's like building a website that only renders in Lynx then wondering why you don't get many visitors.
Or if we really must have a tired car analogy, it's like building a car that only runs on goat urine then... wondering why all your... customers... erm... smell so bad?
"I'm sure I read something about the Asian Network costing the BBC more per listener than a prime time TV show, so it has to be a failure"
As a public service broadcaster, the BBC has little need to be motivated by ratings. As long as they have enough support across the board to keep the license money coming in, the number of listeners/viewers for each individual service should be of little consequence as long as there is some demand for it.
I say "should", of course, because the BBC has gradually drifted so far away from its original purpose that it's a wonder the government hasn't intervened.
You are incredibly naive if you believe that antivirus software can protect you from all past, present and future threats. In fact, signature-based antivirus software is entirely reactive, and is therefore useless against new and unknown malware.
Similarly, Windows updates alone aren't enough to protect your Windows PC from all threats. Installing OS updates and running an up-to-date antivirus solution and both essential layers of security. Neglect either one and you are exposing yourself to unnecessary risk.
"...possibly enabling someone to imagine that someone or something else might be a child..."
Notwithstanding the sarcasm of your post, I think you may have hit the nail on the head there. The real "crime" we're talking about here is the crime of *thinking about* inappropriate conduct with a child. Young children should be protected, but when a government starts telling you what you can and can't think, something has gone very, very wrong.
If a paedophile finds they can get their kicks by looking at adult women with small breasts and pretending they're little girls, then I'm all for it. Better that than having them pursuing actual children.
64-bit architectures allow for a byte-addressable memory space of just over 18 exabytes. Anyone predicting the rise of 128-bit computing by 2012 is out of their fucking mind.
As an interesting aside, a 128-bit address space will give you 3.4 x 10^38 bytes of byte-addressable memory.
There isn't a word for for how mind-bogglingly massive that is, but it's about 340 trillion yottabytes, with a yottabyte being a thousand zettabytes and a zettabyte being a thousand exabytes.
It's a pretty safe bet that there isn't that much data on the entire planet.
"I feel most sorry for the iPod users out there. The iPod is lovely to look at, well made but jeez - so locked down it is untrue."
I take exception to your comments about the iPod. I recently bought my first iPod (Classic) and I can say with some confidence that it's definitely not well-made. Also, being such a scratch and fingerprint magnet means that within about a minute of opening the box, it's no longer lovely to look at either.
Where's your creativity? Where's your seizure-inducing colours? And the all-important line 40 to stop it from halting with the "scroll?" prompt when the screen gets full!
10 RANDOMIZE
20 LET x = INT(RND * 7) : LET y = INT(RND * 7) : LET z = INT(RND * 7)
30 PAPER x : INK y : BORDER z
40 POKE 23692, 255
50 PRINT "Dixons is crap ";
60 GOTO 20
And they called it a mis-spent youth....
These articles always remind me of the "bloatware all the way" song that was doing the rounds in the 90s:
http://humour.davintech.ca/microsoft-bloatware.phtml
The hypothetical MS Word 15 requires unimaginably vast system resources for comic effect - in this case, they've gone for a whopping 60 MB of RAM and an incredible 900 MB of disk space. It's funny now because even given these ridiculous comic exaggerations, Office 14 is still managing to exceed all expectations in terms of system requirements.
"A parallel decrease in the frequency of sexual intercourse and the incidence of carpal tunnel syndrome between the sixth and the seventh decades of life suggests a possible cause and effect relationship between sexual intercourse and carpal tunnel syndrome"
Correlation implies causation? Who knew?! To think all us "proper scientists" have been doing it wrong all this time!
CGI animation used to about pushing the boundaries and creating animated works thought to be impossible with more traditional methods. Now it's little more than a cost-saving exercise in many cases.
You need only watch Coraline to see some of the amazing things that are possible with modern stop-motion animation. Much of the modelling and SFX were computer-assisted, but the animation is pure stop-motion, and the result is one of the most visually stunning films of the last decade.
It will be a real shame if we lose this artform altogether.
IE6 was built into Windows, but seriously, what else would you have used in 2001?
Firefox wasn't around then, and Opera was ad-riddled crapware. Safari didn't even exist on the Mac, let alone Windows. Netscape was dead in the water and Mozilla hadn't reached a stable release.
I know we have a rich and competitive Windows browser market now, but this simply wasn't the case 9 years ago. As much as you'd like to deny it, IE6 really was the best solution back then.
When Firefox, Opera et al can be installed, configured and locked down via Group Policy, they may have half a chance at reducing Internet Explorer's dominance in corporate networks.
Until then, most companies will take their chances with IE, ours included. Say what you will about alternatives being safer, faster or more user friendly; sysadmins working on a Windows domain would have to be crazy to use anything other than IE.
"...a growing tendency in some legislatures to regard nudity – particularly nudity of children – as sexual and therefore, by definition, pornographic, irrespective of the content of the picture"
That really says more about the warped and twisted minds of the legislators than the arbitrarily-labelled "criminals" this sort of thing is meant to catch.
Businesses aren't set up to create an ethical utopia where everyone's human rights are respected and no-one has anything to fear from anyone or anything. Like it or not, businesses exist solely to make profit. Despite the "ethical policies" that some companies publish as a PR trick, corporate entities will behave in an ethical way *only* if they see it as profitable.
China is a huge market, and Apple would no doubt lose a huge chunk of its cash if it withdrew from it. However, continuing to do business in China and respecting the local laws (and therefore being unethical) will likely lose them very little money. A handful of people might boycott Apple in the West because of it, but it's nothing compared to losing the 1.3 billion potential customers in China.
TL;DR: It's more profitable for Apple to stay in China and obey their laws than it is to be ethical and pull out.
Fifteen miles at < 62 mph would get me to work and back without having to burn any petrol. Plus when the battery does run out, the ICE kicks in and you have a normal car - better than the grinding to a halt and catching the bus home you get with a fully electric car.
Seems to me that the plug-in hybrid is the only practical way for most people to own an electric car at the moment. The only issue I can see is that putting a lithium ion battery in a car effectively means you're sitting on a bomb.
Call me a weirdo, but in filling in these reCAPTCHAs, I've discovered more than a few that would make excellent band names. Here are some of my favourites:
Mon Vodka
Pinhole Husband
Clack Zolonko
Starch Wife
Gapes Orion
$39 Nibblers
Double Debbie
Stoney Member
Houston Lewd
And my personal favourite:
Gordon Surtaxes
Any budding musicians stuck for a snappy band name would be better off trying reCAPTCHA rather than one of the other silly band name generators on the net!
Does anyone else remember back when these services first became popular? Before all this "face space" and "twatter" nonsense, it was just a way to stop a pasted link wrapping over multiple lines, causing Outlook Express to do a brain fart when the clueless recipients tried to click on it.
I seem to remember the first service to gain popularity was called makeashorterlink.com. Great idea, but in their naïvety they failed to realise that others would come along and make... Even Shorter Links!
It's a great comment, but my concern is that if it's not possible to exist outside of the Universe, there can be no objective observations of it. Science, therefore, is unable to prove the existence of the Universe.
The other possibility is that "space" is infinite, but there's a matter boundary, where crossing the boundary leads to an infinite expanse of empty space where no matter (or antimatter) exists. By crossing the boundary, you introduce matter into the space and therefore expand the Universe. Of course, if "space" is infinite, then it can't be shown to exist either.
Hubble's Ultra Deep Field image is undoubtedly beautiful, but it also seems to be mocking us. It's like we're trying to find our way in an infinitely complex hall of mirrors - the deeper we look, the deeper it goes.
CERN originally stood for "Conseil Européen pour la Recherche Nucléaire" (European Council for Nuclear Research). The name later changed to "Organisation Européenne pour la Recherche Nucléaire" (after they got organised?), but the acronym stayed the same.
Of course, the research undertaken by the LHC can't really be described as "nuclear research", as they have gone beyond the atomic nucleus and are working with much smaller subatomic particles.