Oh really ?
"She said she thought because the information was not official she was allowed to publish it."
Maybe Id expect that as a defence in the daily star. And if she really thought that she should be sacked as incompetent.
But the real questions that need answering are:
1>. Why are candidates (and their reps) allowed to even see any votes before they have all been cast?
2>. Why are postal votes even opened before the ballot is complete?
3>. Why do postal votes even exist if we cant verify the eligibility of the voter?
Until those questions are answered there will simply be no legitimacy to any election as widespread fraud is possible. That fraud played into the hands of labour. Perhaps the LibCons will be keen to do something about it as part of their electoral reform? And hopefully people of Bristol east are content to have elected someone so mind-numbingly stupid as their representative. I asked it before, but is someone with the intellectual capacity of a pot plant really the best person you could have put forward ?
Morons.