So Acer are saying...
... people will ignore their kit in favour of higher-quality kit from reputable manufacturers?
(Paris because she was never cheap).
444 publicly visible posts • joined 23 Apr 2007
I think I first heard this argument about 15 years ago. Pentiums were being withdrawn due to worries over the maths bug and pundits commented the newer machines had little appreciable advantage over the 486DX2 boxes for "normal" office applications anyway, as shown when companies dusted off those older boxes and pressed them back into service.
So what happened? No, don't answer that, but if (big IF) desktop PCs continue to grow in performance, memory and storage capacity the way they have then at some point those oh-so-desirable Core i7 systems packing 8GB RAM and a TB disk will be on sale at £20 at your local computer fair / car boot sale in the same manner Pentium 2/3s currently are.
Of course at some point we'll hit a desktop usability crisis when the vastly-faster new hardware the software developers were banking on doesn't appear and the latest greatest edition of your software thing runs like an utter utter dog. Ring any bells?
I watched the first space shuttle mission landing on t'telly with t'parents back in the early eighties when I was nine or ten. Back then some of us (those without fully developed brains) still thought there was a future in space exploration.
The best part of thirty years later and a manned mission returning to earth is still headline news.We blew it. Confined to a tiny speck of sand, as Pendulum put it.
Since when was the web Microsoft's? Never. They've tried enough times to move in and take it over, but they failed and what with the growing importance of little internet dohickeys that don't run windows the lock-out tactic they favour is looking more pathetic than ever. Sod off and die Redmond.
Paris, because she's open.
(No, I'm not an Apple user.)
The Eee 701 was great - an obvious first-generation potentially market-disrupting piece of kit (with obvious room for improvement, like all 1st gen things). The 901 tackled the most pressing deficiencies without compromising the cool concept and it's superb - a big enough screen, great battery life (for an x86), above-average wifi reception and small and cheap enough to carry around in ones man-bag. Oh, and it'll still work after being waved around a bit while turned on, thanks to the lack of a spinning thing.
The windowsification of netbooks is depressing, but don't lose heart just yet. The industry is still groping its way towards a portable or at least coffee-table internet device that people actually like. I'll be interested to see how ARM-based devices measure up on battery life and performance. I have no idea how good they are these days, will they be up to playing normal-res divx videos? That's a killer-app for me.
Until then, the 901 is god.
Mine's the one made of neoprene.
... can suck my balls for the time being.
I think they're actually trying to kill off the PC as a games platform, what with the malware and the limited activation nonsense. I've spent a healthy wodge of money on games over the last twenty-odd years and would happily have coughed up for the recent Burnout 11 and Crysis: limey edition titles if they hadn't been messed up. Bring out clean versions of these and I will buy them first thing tomorrow.
I would actually consider an Xbox 360 now if only I could be confident I wouldn't be returning it multiple times for warranty repairs and having to drive to far-flung industrial estates to pick it up from seedy courier depots.
Oh well. Guess I'll have to get a life instead.
...do fanboiz keep wasting their lives modelling and rendering these mockups and why do news sites like this keep encouraging them? Surely you're not that desperate for material?
Perhaps Cadbury's should introduce a slightly different shape of Curly-wurly every spring. Losers could then spend the winter designing, colouring and texturing plausible photo-realistic next-generation Curly-wurlies to impress each other with. If they do really really well then Cadbury's might offer them the 2011-season Curly-wurly design gig...
Paris, because she likes Curly-wurlies.
"No he was still a hard-light hologram, albeit he had become the next Ace Rimmer and the H disappeared, but that was just a software change. He went of to travel the universe and be handsome and brave in the dimension jump ship."
The Rimmer at the end of the last season, last seen kicking Death in the unmentionables, was the nanothingy-reconstructed-along-with-red-dwarf-and-the-rest-of-its-crew Rimmer. Sorry Dwarf fans, that last season wasn't just a bad dream brought on by late-90s alcopops. I guess the original-holographic-now-hardlight-now-replacement-ace-Rimmer must still be out there somewhere...
I'm thrilled to hear it's going to be a jokey cross-over with Coronation Street though. Can we look forward to Lister taking time out to present special editions of Robot Wars and Cyberzone ("Ooger Wooger")? That would make it even more perfect.
Evil Bill Gates because he's obviously the scriptwriter.
I am not generally one for museums but I did the tour of Bletchley Park one sunday a few years ago and heartily recommend it - there's some good coverage of the computer science side of things. It'd be a real shame if this temple to British l887ness and Nazi-pwning got turned into another Tesco car park.
There's nothing games-industry specific here. Businesses like their costs (eg training) externalised. Eighty percent of employers want somebody who will work 50 hour weeks for under £20K , be 100% up to speed on their second day at the job, show fanatical loyalty for the duration of their project and then bugger off without complaining when they're deemed surplus to requirements. The same companies will offshore to India at the drop of a hat so why exactly should anyone in the UK take any particular notice of what they want?
If you're a sufficiently casual user to be happy with something of this spec (and millions are) you'd probably prefer an Eee for its portability (no computer desk taking up space in the spare bedroom)...
... unless the "cloud" element is really really special. Which it probably isn't.
Your figure of 800 flights is based on the fuel consumption for a London to New York flight. Okay some routes are longer, but a lot of them are short hops to the Costa Del Scum etc. In addition not all aircraft are 500-passenger behemoths and therefore burn less fuel per mile. The actual theoretical-production-capacity / Heathrow-consumption is therefore probably a lot better. Are the statistics available for how much fuel Heathrow sells? (FWIW I still don't think the biofuel capacity is remotely sufficient).
Mine's the one with the slide rule in the pocket.
I think you're right about Rover. Remember the internal dialogue representing the three lives of the game:
"Jim won't mind if I borrow his mower."
"I'll just nip and borrow tom's..."
"Good old Alf... He's a decent chap."
Plus "Go on boy! Kill!" and "ARGH! Lay off me you beastly hound!"
(How long before someone fires up an emulator and corrects these quotes?) This is why the Commodore 64 scene was so much cooler than the purgatory of Spectrum ownership.
As this is an IT site shouldn't we have a nostalgia icon? Perhaps Mr T or Adam Ant?