OH GOD OH NO WIBBLE WIBBLE PANIC
Fuxache, I could make something less likely to blow up with a bit of metal pipe and a hammer.
But hey, this is using them magic computer things, which makes it worse, no?
3500 publicly visible posts • joined 22 Apr 2007
There really should be a cap on how much you can be charged for data. Hetzner, the hosting company, will charge you something like £6 per terabyte if you go over the traffic allowance and want to keep the 100Mbit speeds. How in fuck can Orange even start to justify their costs per megabyte?
After they've charged you twenty quid or so, that should be it and it shouldn't matter if you have ADownloader running 24/7 torrenting Linux ISOs to all and sundry. There's only so much per month a phone can download for fuxache.
That Turing bloke showed that all software is equivalent to a machine (a mechanical thing).
No he didn't, otherwise I could create a machine by thinking up some simple rules in my head.
Funnily enough, a machine is a physical thing, and software is only physical in the sense that it exists as state changes. Software is math and logic, and you're using faulty logic to play right into the psychopathic IP brigade's trap.
About microcontrollers? They are just small computers. With software. Which should not be patentable.
If you assume that menu bars have to be associated with windows, then, yes, OS X's menu bar will be extremely confusing to you. (As in: "what window is this thing for?") But if you can get past that mental limitation and realize that in OS X, menu bars are associated with *applications*, then the menu bar's location and operation make perfect sense and I don't see how it could be designed any other way.
I'd rather just have a UI that's easy to use. No, I don't mean TIFKAM.
When you click on a program, that means you want to use the program. Whether or not it's currently running is irrelevant.
You might have a terabyte of RAM and a ten-SSD stripe array plugged directly into the PCIe bus on a 16x slot, but I don't. Even if I did, I want to know what is running and what is not. At a glance.
Also, ever clicked the wrong button before? I'm assuming you're human and not a General System Vehicle or other synthetic intelligence that might be a few thousand times more accurate than your average meat-sack.
The hot corner stuff isn't enabled by default
Yes it is. Top right corner, zooms everything out and shows all of the windows. Sounds like a handy thing until you keep tripping it by accident.
And don't get me started on Explorer either.
Meh, horses for courses. Personally I bloody hate OS X's UI, with the unified confuso-menu, and the dock that wants you to think a shortcut to a program and a running program are the same thing. Don't even get me started on those bloody hot corners, and Finder.. god, you actually like that thing?
As far as the direction KDE's going in, you'll probably find they have the least "radical and exciting" look to them of all the Linux (and other) desktop environments. If you could use KDE3, you can use KDE4. It's just prettier, and with plasma widgets.
To be honest, if they were going the way of rendering stuff remotely, then why spend hundreds on a games console when you can download the Onlive app for nowt or buy the Onlive box for significantly less than a brand new "next gen" machine?
You'll be about as likely to be able to sell or give your old games away in any case.
"games are hard to multi-thread efficiently"
One for AI, one for physics, two for handling the server, one for the client - that's 5 already and I'm not even trying.
Of course it depends on the game. I mean you could massively parallelise a game of Minesweeper (one process or thread for every square?) - but why in hell would you want to?
You must have only played about two games as well. Seriously, go look at the game requirements on the boxes.
Vast majority of console games out now use that hard drive, and for more than just saving your progress.
Trying to remember what game it is that wants you to download the entire set of textures all over again as a patch when you shove it in the drive.
PS3 uses MS Visual Studio as its IDE, and OpenGL ES and CG for talking to the GPU. Not sure about much else since I didn't sign the NDAs for that.
I would guess that the forthcoming Xbox will also be similarly stuffed full of interesting stuff that you'll only get to know about if you jump through the right hoops and promise not to tell anybody.
" Also, all games apparently have to be installed when you buy them, which could really piss people off."
Why? Virtually every console game released now has a "this game requires 4 fuckloads of hard drive storage" message on the back or similiar, and then you get the inevitable stream of patches that take the beta-level shit you've bought and plug some showstopping bugs.
Not being able to sell the game on the other hand? Well eh, we've had a few years of Steam and other such bullshit getting people used to the idea of that. People in general will bend over, take it up the arse, and deride the people that refuse to as being freetards or luddites.
Welcome to the Computer Games industry.
"I've come to the point where, if a game is not on Steam, I practically don't buy it. There are a few exceptions, but they are exceptions."
And like I said, all we need now is for Steam and WGA to royally fuck up, and maybe you'll learn why Steam is a Bad Thing.
For me, if it's on Steam, or requires any other kind of bullshit online we-think-you're -a-criminal check, it gets immediately refused and the money spent on something else. Maybe something I can sell or give away once I've done with it.
Same people who were laughing at me and throwing all kinds of asinine insults when this bullshit first hit the mainstream? The people who were telling me that I'm just a pirate who wants everything for free? The same ones with this insane level of trust in an organisation expressely designed to milk them for as much as they are worth?
Damned right I am. At you, too.
Suck it up, bitches.
...AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA....
Suckers.
Well maybe now they'll learn, which will be better for all of us.
Now we just need Steam and WGA to fuck up royally for everyone. Well, everyone stupid enough to think having to plead with DRM servers to be allowed to use your own damned software is ever a good idea.
Just remember, while "hacking" is illegal, poisoning a database is not.
Favourite ALL the cat videos!
Oh and don't forget TrackMeNot. Perhaps someone could make a gmail version that works with everyone else who has the gmail version to randomly email each other random snippets generated from random web searches?
If you can't go under the radar, obliterate the fucker with chaff and flares.
No, just capitalist. Their aim, like every other PLC, is the acquiring of capital.
That capitalism left entirely unchecked can well end up turning into outright corporate fascism, especially when helped by a hundred or so years of lawyering and abuse of laws designed to protect actual physical people.. well, that's a debate I guess. Still capitalism though.
Really, asides blocking obvious malware, why bother?
I guess if you're in a school you have to conform to some standard or other so the blame can go elsewhere when the kids discover in graphic detail how useless web filters are. Though honestly, if it's that strict an environment, then set up a whitelist of approved sites and deny access to all others.
If you're in a workplace? I presume your employees are adults. If you catch 'em slacking, deal with it. Websense ain't gonna help you there. Might even be a hindrance if necessary information ends up being stuck behind the censorwall because the word "condom" is buried twenty paragraphs down and five directories in, so the whole site is obviously porn.
I've ran into their oh-so-accurate filtering before.
So has this guy (apparently inaccessible from Websense IP addresses, amusingly enough)
"Lower TCO"
Who's measuring? Using how many discredited Microsoft-sponsored reports?
" more efficient on same hardware"
No. Just no. There's a reason the top 500 supers are almost all Toy Unix based - because it's not quite a toy any more. With my own personal experiences largely flying in the face of your assertion (and I'm sure, many others who have similar experiences), I have to wonder what you're on about?
"and there is Powershell - which is more powerful than any default UNIX shell."
Ah, a troll. Okay, you got me, I guess.
I would use Linux if I knew beans about programming
Give one of the friendlier Linuxes a try in Virtualbox or something. Granted, you can't just download Crysis for it, but at the same time, Ubuntu Software Center or Synaptic is distinctly easier to use than C++. Needing to know how to edit Xorg.conf went out of the window a looooong time ago.
because they are and will always be incapable of becoming more than they are programmed to be.
Start with a grid of cells. Each cell can be alive or dead.
On every turn:
Every cell with < 2 neighbours dies.
Every cell 2-3 neighbours survives.
Cells with > 3 neighbours die.
Empty spaces with exactly three neighbours become populated with a new living cell.
Simple rules. You wouldn't think that they'd be capable of producing such staggering complexity. Complex enough to be Turing Complete, if you're masochist enough.
"ME was the last Windows I ever voluntarily used. Didnt seem too bad at the time."
Aye. Thing is, ME was fast by comparison to Windows 98, but rather fragile and tended to fall over at the drop of a hat. At least that was my own experience before going back to 98SE at the time.
And yes, the desktop Linuxes are rather nice these days. Problem is you'll never edit a docx file properly in Linux (for one example), and the problem isn't simply an engineering one.