Younger consumers may not remember...
...that there was a time when we didn't have to do this.
643 publicly visible posts • joined 23 Aug 2008
I'm not missing the scale of the problem we're trying to solve. I'm pointing out that the problem arises from a poor approach to quality control. I don't want to change important subsystems in my computer every day either: it's the suppliers who want to do that.
You say that "We implement software systems precisely so they can be changed". This is like saying "My house is built of bricks, so it can survive a tough environment", then firing mortars at it to get your money's worth.
If cars were like computers, we'd still have to "get out and get under" almost every day. We'd spend half our evenings applying the latest compulsory updates and fixes, but still wonder what difference they made.
The notion that the computer industry is approaching maturity is about as comical as it gets. Maybe it's at the stage of the automobile sometime in the 1930s. There simply isn't a comparable approach to quality (achieving a product that works and doesn't need tinkering throughout its life).
"Each person's voice is as unique as their fingerprint...Therefore, when a customer calls up...the technology will be able to identify them...".
"Barclays voice recognition technology...has been "fully tested".
You couldn't make this stuff up. Do you think they really believe it?
It may be uncomfortable to hear it, but it's worth killing a few hundred, maybe a few thousand people if it brings forward a few years the enormous economic advantage of self-driving vehicles. Of course, you may need to do your testing in countries where life is cheaper.
ARM is pure IP, not a bunch of factories, so it's 100% about the skill and enthusiasm of its employees.
So, expect a few spin-offs (outside SoftBank's control) when employees realise they're viewed as the livestock that came with the farm (now run from the other side of the planet) and the atmosphere changes.
"The machine veered to the left to avoid the child, but the child ran backwards directly into...".
So, a stationary machine "veered" when it saw something approaching? We don't usually speak of "veering" when stationary. Or maybe the machine veered while moving? I'm not clear I'd know what to do if a moving automaton decided to change direction when I was moving with an intention to avoid it, so should we expect a child to know how to negotiate that?
As for running backwards, I don't recall that I was ever able to do that, yet it's invoked as an explanation here.
I assume that the company had an opportunity to lay out a clear explanation, but it seems to have failed.
If it's practicable to infer content from the pattern of data flow, that applies to the "legitimate" communication, too. So secure encryption requires that the flow be rendered less dependent on the content (by padding it with filler data, by adding random short delays between packets or whatever), spoiling this "antimalware" method at the same time.
...proudly been a part of the British economy and society for over a century, with a substantial presence. In times of uncertainty, IBM's core values, including the unwavering dedication to the success of all our clients, matter more than ever as a guide for our actions.
Well, if this management-speak means anything, I'd guess it means "If customers stop buying, we'll drop our prices".
The Alliant team at GSA has worked diligently to engage with stakeholders on a transparent, collaborative and interactive process, including both federal agency and industry partner involvement during the pre-solicitation phase.
When you swallow a dictionary, I suppose it has to come out at one end or the other.
The same happens if you read a book. Doctors train for years to deal with serious problems, not these trivialities. Avoiding "unnecessary anxiety and costly investigations" doesn't need a caring session, just a smack on the face and instruction to "get real".
Last time I checked, my 4-digit customer number still worked, although that surprised the assistant.
Maplin shops were fun to browse. I'd usually emerge £20 or so poorer than I'd intended. But now the staff are instructed constantly to pester customers (typically with inane enquiries like "Are you alright there?"). So every visit is unpleasant and to be avoided. If tomorrow will do, I order from hassle-free Farnell.
The cliché "You know when (s)he's lying because his/her lips are moving" isn't always an exaggeration: the deeper the hole, the greater the urge to keep digging, so why waste time on truly informatiive words?
Perhaps, in this case, "honesty" means "Customer data is secure...I mean not secure...I mean...".
Where are the figures to support " we know that they have appreciated our efforts"? Perhaps it's based on one customer who said "I'm glad you've stopped lying".
When you start throwing the sics around, you'd best be very careful about the rest of your message, because people are liable to throw a few back. In this case, the author is either pushing his own preference or doesn't have the experience to know that some people use "data" as the plural of "datum", while others have adopted it as an ordinary English singular noun.
Some foreign-derived words should be labelled "Don't try this at home", to save us the pain of "this criteria", "in memorium", "ad nauseum" and the rest. Don't get me started on "graffito".
"The flaw looks like it is down to a tiny error by Chrome's developers..."
There are no "tiny errors" in today's computers. If you plan to get up on your hind legs and crow that you're taking over the world, you need to be careful with errors of any "size".
If this flaw is so insignificant, why is it worthy of an article about it, particularly one which appears determined to play it down?
I think it was Tony Hoare who wrote that "A programmer who uses assertions while testing and turns them off during production is like a sailor who wears a life vest while drilling on shore and takes it off at sea". Maybe Google could do with such basic notions of software quality.
'...the European Data Protection Supervisor said it was "not robust enough to withstand future legal scrutiny" and refused to endorse it. And in April, Europe's data protection authorities said the new agreement was "not acceptable".'
Questioned on the UK position, the Home and Foreign Offices said "We'll ask the US what we think and get back to you".
"Helium would only escape if there some pressure differential between the inside of the drive and the atmosphere...".
Does diffusion depend on a pressure difference? Net diffusion of a given gas would depend on the difference in its *own* partial pressure (across the membrane), but would take place independently of any other gas present. (The whole notion of a gas is that its particles don't interact much with others).
"Helium...smaller and monatomic...therefore..."
Nice theory, but I recall a TV school science programme where children actually did the experiment (diffusion time from a balloon) and found that carbon dioxide escapes much faster than hydrogen (perhaps because it could dissolve in the rubber of the balloon?) Real life is rarely as simple as GCSE physics.
With hindsight, it was only a matter of time before Unicode became a target for the PC brigade (or Google, which seems to feel that the entire human world is at its disposal).
Unicode characters were intended to represent repeated features of real languages so you could write in those languages and about them, without resorting to graphics. (This includes the facility to write about "dead" languages like those used in Mayan script or in Egyptian hieroglyphics).
The Unicode Consortium rightly rejected the proposal of a code page for the Klingon language. Unicode is not a platform in which to express support for political movements, whether the associated images show women in "professional" jobs or at the kitchen sink.