Re: I don't even trust Google with basic email
Really? In my experience, their filters are the best in marking things as spam that aren't.
132 publicly visible posts • joined 20 Aug 2008
The Dutch 'toeslagenaffaire', referenced in a link in the article, wasn't really caused by an "AI-based risk-scoring system". It's true a risk-scoring system was involved, but that could hardly be called 'AI'. It was a set of manually created/entered rules. If you call that AI, then every computer system ever invented deserves that qualification.
¨which means that it march 2020 we could scientifically know that the covid was harmless and posed a risk only for the elderly (>70)"
This must be the most retarded nonsense about covid I've come across in years.
Except for my half brother, the people I mentioned, who died of covid or were hospitalised, were in their fifties and fourties and healthy.
You're an idiot.
"The only thing that surprises me is that it has taken so long for this to become a standard tactic..."
It hasn't.
This has been 'current practice' for ages. The fact the ACCC has taken this long to warn about it doesn't change that.
Reading the subreddit r/scams should be obligatory for anyone who has been scammed (and it's not a bad idea for others either...).
All four were named - with copies of their passports - in the articles that showed up on the web here in The Netherlands, when the news about the The Hague situation first came out.
https://nos.nl/artikel/2253313-mivd-we-hebben-russische-hack-van-opcw-in-den-haag-voorkomen.html
Whether those passports actually show the guys' real names...?
How about maybe not?
I was pretty open minded about it at first, but the more I learn about it, the more it annoys me. It's really trying to be too much.
Want a better init system? Build a better init system. Don't make it do things no init system was ever meant to do.