Re: We can likely expect gridlock for the next two years
In our state, “just pass the lottery - all the proceeds will be going to the schools.” B.S. The schools have yet to see the money.
It’s not necessarily B.S. — for example, the lottery proceeds by themselves might be insufficient to fully fund the financial needs of your state’s schools. Or some portion of the state taxes that were previously allocated to your schools before the introduction of the lottery might have been reällocated to other insufficiently funded areas of state responsibility, because the lottery proceeds had been forecast to surpass the amount of the reällocation.
I am for government. I don’t want or have an interest being in charge of making sure those things are working. What I am not for is the bureaucracy we have.
Do you see the average voter in your state as having any responsibility for the bureaucracy that you have? Do you see perpetual gridlock as the only plausible response to the actions (or inactions) of your bureaucracy?
I am for gridlock so we can have a breather for a couple of years.
Gridlock won’t provide a breather; what it will provide is a couple of additional years for solutions to be avoided (“kicking the can down the road”) and existing political attitudes to ossify further (“if you’re not for us, you’re against us”).
If a law or regulation is passed, there is to be no exceptions, NONE. You can’t bribe (get a permit) the bureaucracy into allowing you to do it.
If the law is needed, it needs to be for EVERYONE.
What if a proposed law or regulation wouldn’t directly affect everyone in your state? For example, suppose that marine biologists have documented a precipitous decline in commercial fish stocks in your state’s waters over the past 25 years, and recommended to your lawmakers that commercial fish catches be placed under a quota for some number of years to allow the fish populations to rebound, e.g. a total catch by all commercial fishermen of some number of tons of certain fish species per year. Should such a law or regulation not be passed because it would only directly affect commercial fishermen in your state’s waters, and wouldn’t directly affect everyone? If it should be passed, should permits to catch certain amounts of particular fish species per year not be sold to commercial fishermen as a means of allocating the quota, because sale of the permits would be bribes to the bureaucracy?