Re: Terminator *5*??
Why do I keep reading this as Terminal 5?
That said given what a mess Heathrow made of that (as anyone who's flown through it can attest) perhaps it's appropriate after all.
2797 publicly visible posts • joined 25 Jul 2008
I dunno, we're even rebooting comments now? (the very first and most popular one).
Says it all really I guess...
How about something new and original like, well, a new and original idea, script and story?
It's all getting tiresome, especially when the original movie was designed as a one-off with a complete story sequence and ending, but is then a surprise hit and so the whole lot gets mangled to get a series out of it (looking at you here PotC). And how the hell can there be Independence Day 2?
And Arnie as a rebooted Terminator? From those photos, it's more a complete overhaul that'd be needed.
And on my Win7 boxes and laptops, I just click the little icon that's conveniently placed on the taskbar, which features all sorts of other convenient icons for other tools that I often use plus useful stuff like a clock.
Or is that too archaic and old-fashioned in the modern touch environment? Too much like actually pushing a button to start something? Oops, shouldn't mention start and button in the same sentence around here :)
And for further global compatibility, occasionally put the whole lot plus steering wheel on the left hand side of the vehicle.
And as one is a foot-based interface and the other is hand-based, there is of course no need to have the two co-ordinated and sharing resources by being on the same side of the car.
I obviously lived in a bigger town, ours was 4-digits.
Strange to thing that when I was a teenager there wasn't internet, www, facebook, twitter, "proper" mobile phones (ones that weren't the size and weight of bricks with even less battery life than a modern smartphone) or indeed that much of a computer ecosystem at all (but the '64 and the Speccie were still fun).
My kids still don't believe me when I tell them that (given I basically make microchips for a living, and I'm only going grey due to aforesaid kids rather than too-advanced age).
So between the gestures, the face-tracking and the eyeball focus monitoring, soon we're supposed to look like epileptic spies? Combine it with a bluetooth headset so we look like we're also talking to ourselves and you have the full set.
Not so long ago appearing like that would have you carted off to the loony bin. Hmm, I guess if you were daft enough to use such a feature then it'd probably be an appropriate response anyway.
<--- Mine's the one without straps on the arms, at least for now.
Asking what customers want and building it leads to design-by-committee and the Homer Simpson Car.
Or the Ford Edsel, to give the more real-world example on which Homer's was based.
All perfectly true and quite potentially disasterous. But doing the exact opposite, telling your customers what they want and ignoring how they respond to it is equally risky, as MS have found out.
Proper market research and beta-testing/previewing should of course avoid either extreme case. Unfortunately for them (and us) that doesn't seem to be what's happened this time.
"Should we call that a PC? Should we call it a tablet?"
Fundamentally there's a problem - we shouldn't care what we call the damn thing. We just want something that we can use to achieve our tasks, be they email, web surfing, social media, watching tv/movies or work.
Just give us the tools to do that, and an overall operating system that lets us use those tools without getting in the way...
When did OneNote become a core application of Office too? I always thought the 4 were Word, Excel, PowerPoint and Outlook (with the latter optionally replaced by Access, depending on your needs)?
Was it just when it was found to be the lowest hanging fruit, being the simplest to convert to a touch environment?
Nice to know I'm not the only one who had that mental image.
Just picture the scared and wounded MacBook surrounded and in a corner, snarling at the circling Geniuses and trying to avoid their nets and pointy sticks.
Then it's bagged, crated and rushed off to a hidden warehouse somewhere where its very existence can be plausibly denied.
"Competitors are only now launching first generation devices, while we are already launching a 3rd generation device with all the insight gained from over half a million customers combined with Sony's wealth of technology expertise to create the best ever smartwatch experience," said Stefan Persson, head of companion products at Sony Mobile.
Or in other words there must be money in this as others are now trying it, so we're going to have yet another crack at it after cocking it up twice before. Let's just ignore the half-million punters who got burned with those failures and hope that they don't hold it against us.
Plus it's the fact that your basic £250 PC/laptop/whateverbook is now powerful enough to do everything 99% of users want, so unless they break the thing or it wears out then there's no need to update it.
Hence why we now get told that the machine can (for example) edit HD video. Now I'm sure that's not something that most people would wish to do, given how long such things take to upload to YouTube etc. Most people are happy just to watch them, plus surf the net, do email and maybe a few games, most of which will quite happily go on a 2-3 year old machine, or on a new budget one.
Was looking earlier with a colleague at a new laptop he was going to replace a failed desktop machine with. £250 for something that will do everything needed.
Yes you can pay more (thank you Intel), but unless you're a road warrior lugging the thing about, who needs excessively thin and light when it'll just sit on a desk most of the time, and by being bigger and chunkier it can have all sorts of archaic but useful things on it like a DVD drive, ethernet and a nice handful of USB or similar.
So does Derren Brown, although these days he's become a bit too well known to do it "properly" (suffering from Ali G syndrome).
And then of course there's also longer-standing seekers of the real truth, like James Randi. Also a former magician, sits quite nicely between Brown and Houdini.
More likely the Word 97 document they found would read "It didn't work and went bang. Pretend it was a firework display to honour our glorious leader".
One can't help but think of this as the little boy teasing the tiger. OK an old and fairly toothless starved tiger, but those can sometimes be the most lethal when cornered.
My own personal fear of Google Glass is not so much that I might leave them on while having a post-coital bath so much as while having a post-curry dump
It could be worse - at least they only deal with vision rather than all five senses (or at least don't include smell-o-vision).
The Edinburgh mainframe was so old that parts of its code had been written in Assembler, a language rooted in the immediate post-war years, with dates going back to 1970.
Umm, didn't the war end in the mid 1940's?
And we haven't fought with Scotland itself since the mid 1500's, which is a little early even for Assember.
For the moment I'll stick with my electro-quadrent (micro-USB, mini-USB, phone and Apple - from the pound shop of all places) as that way I can conveniently still use the connected item without worrying about charging myself or ensuring I don't mess up the wireless charge.
But it's interesting tech anyway, especially if it can be evolved to safely charge at a reasonable distance, a la Tesla's dream.
Might have a quick look at this, simply to see who my passport actually thinks I am. Having tried the ePassport gates @ Gatwick now several times (business travel) and getting bounced from them more times than they let me through, I'm becoming convinced I'm either not who my passport thinks I am, or perhaps not who I think I am (not sure which is the more worrying option).
Oh bring back the IRIS gates - quick, simple and they actually worked...
...should be the one that you don't notice, which just acts as a nice gateway portal into the functionality (program or application) that you actually want to use.
All most people want from an OS is something that gets the machine up and running quickly, allows easy access to the programs/apps that do the various specialised jobs and is a stable and secure enough platform to be a good foundation level and not bring the whole lot crashing down or allowing viruses/malware to sneak in. Aside from that it should be out of the way and not interfering with daily life.
But it seems to me that this nice simple remit has been replaced by marketting and the "all-singing-all-dancing look at me" approach which is diametrically opposite to where it should be. It's all fancy bling, at the expense of true functionality. Sadly whilst Win8 is one of the main offenders for this, it does seem to be something of a wider trend beginning with things like Unity as well.
Android and iOS, by design and by (older) hardware constraints don't seem to suffer anywhere near as much of this, and so people go for them. The hardware form-factor for media consumption also helps of course, but there's certainly a lesson in there for desktop OS makers should they wish to hear it on their current stroll towards the cliffs...
'Cos then you'd know exactly what they were talking about and could immediately get upset by it, rather than hiding it for long enough that they can scarper.
I mean it's not as if they want to be clear that they're giving bad news when they can dress it up as something else.