* Posts by Bill Mercer

5 publicly visible posts • joined 22 Jul 2008

Microsoft defends intrusive dialog in Visual Studio Code that asks if you really trust the code you've been working on

Bill Mercer

Re: Not that macOS is in any sense perfect …

Actually, Windows has been doing this just as long as Mac OS if not longer.

Files are tagged with an alternate data stream that identifies whether the file came from the local system, trusted network, internet, etc. When you try to open an executable that is flagged as coming from the internet, you're warned that the file is blocked and you have to unblock it or change security settings to allow it to run.

Kids can be so crurl: Lead dev unchuffed with Google's plan to remake curl in its own image

Bill Mercer

Don't get me wrong, I love me some Google bashing, but this looks like it really was just a bad choice of name by an intern. The project has already been renamed as of yesterday afternoon.

https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=973603

Still sniggering at that $999 monitor stand? Apple just got serious about the enterprise

Bill Mercer

Re: Shiny, shiny

Ian's shown himself to be irrational with his claim that nobody who dislikes Apple is allowed to use any technology. You're wasting your time.

Bill Mercer

Re: Shiny, shiny

This comment is utter nonsense. Nobody's obligated to give away anything or stop using anything simply because they are unhappy with one specific vendor. The notion is ludicrous. Furthermore, the idea that Apple's impact on technology is so widespread that it's impossible to find any device or software they were not involved in is equally ludicrous. Frankly, this kind of over-the-top nonsensical response is feeding the stereotype of the Apple Fanboi. Apple's impact on computing is undisputable, but the Apple of today is completely divorced from the early tech innovator.

Registrars turn blind eye to sites selling illegal steroids

Bill Mercer
Stop

Poor reading comprehension makes me sad

The point isn't that registrars should enforce laws. The point is that registrars should enforce their OWN POLICIES.

The "Turning a blind eye" thing doesn't mean that the registrars should be actively investigating every single domain name registered with them. It means that when they receive reports that their customers are violating their policies, they should investigate and take appropriate action.

If you're a registrar and you don't want people reporting violations, don't have such a policy in the first place. It's stupid to make a policy and then ignore it.