Re: 'Female'
Disgusting! They should throw a bucket of water over them!
559 publicly visible posts • joined 20 Jul 2008
The ruffty-tuffty metal box which is designed to keep the money out of the grasp of naughty people has a cost which scales by volume.
Early ATM designs had the computer within the metal box, next to the money, only the keypad, screen and card reader were outside the box for obvious reasons.
Enter beancounters, who notice that putting the computer (which controls tens of thousands of euros in ready cash) OUTSIDE the box, so that it can be rewired, reprogrammed and generally hacked, will reduce the unit cost of the box by thirty euros or so.
Hurrah, across a €20,000,000 deployment of ATMs, you can save €30,000 in outlay whilst only exposing €30,000,000 in ready cash to increased risk of theft!!! Bonuses and promotions for all!
1. if you don't want a random de-orbit, you need to give it a shove into a planned de-orbit so why not give it a shove to keep it in orbit a bit longer?
2. even unmanned and uncontrolled, it can be a valuable research tool for how materials fare in orbit long term and how to deal with space fungus as well as practice for docking or at least grabbing onto uncontrolled objects in orbit.
3. ISS is around 450 tons. it is not worth worrying about it causing a kessler cascade whilst everyone is frantically putting up tens of thousands of comsats at a couple of tons each.
If bots are indistinguishable from humans in how they browse a website, and humans can no longer obtain any useful information from websites due to enshittification, ads, sponsored results, begging screens, redirection, cookie agreements, timeouts waiting for 27th party java code to initialise and FSM knows what else, how accurate are the results of a query to an agentic AI ?
Does it average the answer between the historical data it has been trained on ( "an arrow in the eye in 1066" ) and the current retrieved data ( "we would like just a moment of your time to bring your attention to our fundraiser")?
'within its operational envelope' seems to be doing a lot of heavy lifting, there.
Predicting the velocity and paths, in real time, of multiple vehicles, each of which is altering dynamically in response to the other vehicles around it is non-trivial.
How many lidar returns does it take to accurately measure the shape of a vehicle so that you know where the centre of it is so that you can calculate how far it has moved and in which direction since the last calculation when it may be rotating relative to your viewpoint?
And so on.
I thought from the start that self-driving vehicles looked too much like a problem that could nearly be solved but would always remain just out of reach.
As you keep increasing sensor range and resolution to approach human-like levels ( competent humans, the ones looking at tail lights and traffic behaviour over half a mile ahead ) you get so much data that processing it to identify and predict the paths of other vehicles requires too much hardware and energy to be financially viable.
OS/2 Warp - powered ATMs were much snappier and more responsive on 200mhz hardware than XP-embedded ATMs with 1.2 GHz hardware with all the peripherals the same. And they didn't die if they were power cycled. OS/2 FTW!!
Naturally, management observed that OS/2 worked faster and more reliably on cheaper hardware and so moved heaven and earth to throw money at Microsoft and upgrade the ATMs to XP embedded.
It is much worse than that. If an employee asks for a pay rise, you just say "no" and make them do twice as much work for the same money. When the AI company puts the subscription up to £10,000 a month, then £50,000 a month, where will you find an AI subscription willing to do the work for £0 as an intern to get a foothold in the business? You can blackmail an employee into signing an NDA, but the AI subscription already owns all your IP, processes and data and has been selling them to anybody since the minute you signed up (including the card details you signed up with).
I haven't worked for a traffic authority, but I have monitored traffic queues in real time at junctions where traffic lights have stopped operating. If you think that traffic is faster with lights you have never seen the lack of queues at intersections with broken traffic lights and compared them with the lengthy tailbacks and gridlock which return as soon as the traffic lights are mended.
On the other hand, it did not split along the weld seams, so that at least shows the welds are stronger than the sheets that have been welded. That is as good as it gets for welds, isn't it?
Was it a mishap causing overpressure in the rocket?
Was there a defect in the steel sheet itself?
Hopefully, as it was on test, there will be measurements and video that will help the investigation.
More delays and excuses from this CONMAN!!!!!
Trillions of taxpayer DOLLARS WASTED on this grifter!!! HYPERLOOP FAIL!!! SELFDRIVING FAIL!!! It is BEYOND BELIEF that...
What?
Neutron?
Really?
Oh, I thought you said Elon.
Sorry.
Good luck to the Rocket Labs team. Space is difficult. Looking forward to seeing it launch whenever it is ready.
Putting your findings on the internet IS informing Apple in the best way possible. Apple's PR department finding out about a bug that harms their image will get the issue addressed far sooner than an easily ignored quiet word to the engineering department that hasn't been allocated sufficient budget to test for bugs.
I hear this a lot, rockets have been done, propulsive landing has been done, re-entry and re-use have been done etc. All true, but only spacex is putting them together to build a useful system. Why has nobody else stolen and implemented all this prior work from the last century if it is so trivial?
Wright brothers did not invent the field of airodynamics, internal combustion, control surfaces etc but they managed to put it all together into something which could sustain controlled flight (granted, it needed rails and a pulley to get airborne).
Well, speed is only the thing if you want to get back to the moon before the Chinese land people there.
If you do a quick flag plant and return, the Chinese will say "Big deal, you did that in the sixties and have obviously stagnated since then. We are building a cool moon base with blackjack and hookers."
You will look even worse if you try and do a flag-plant and scoot but something goes wrong and people die.
Better to fail on a more ambitious mission than a repeat of a simpler one
These are just the propaganda and political reasons which can be grasped by the gormless public, the scientific reasons for developing moon base technology are less easily understood.