Move to a different app?
If I'm chatting to someone on a dating app, I have a rule that I want to chat for someone for at least 24hrs before moving to another app and for some strange reason their account always disappears before then \o/
41 publicly visible posts • joined 14 Jul 2008
Yeah, I suspect this is going to end up being a set of rules which are either based on the number of passes or breakdowns since last MOT.
Finding out what those rules are is what the current generation of AIs is quite good for. It might be something like having too many tests done on one day which flags up an investigation but without a lot of testing data from good and bad test centers it would be difficult to identify the conditions.
Sites claiming Google Analytics is a necessary cookie.
Legitimate interest options you have to scroll and unselect every single one of them.
Sites where opting out is required on every visit (or for a few, every page) but opting in is once and done. Can we have a cookie for tracking our cookie choices we can opt into (or is designated necessary)?
I considered something like this a while ago, having a lot of soft identifiers for logging into websites.
You could use identifiers like computer name, browser used, tabs open, sites logged into in current session, input from webcam (both face and background) to build up a identity of the person trying to log in. If this is doesn't match, then more intrusive options can be asked for... fingerprint, password, voice recognition, etc.
It would create a constantly changing ID of you and you could specify the accuracy required for different sites. E.g. Spotify might need low accuracy but it would contribute to the accuracy required to check your emails which then would give enough of an idea that it is you to log into your online banking. If you needed direct access to a high accuracy site, then more traditional methods of identification (remember, biometrics are not a password) and a password could be used.
I've worked in a few places where upgrades or patches were not allowed to be done on any prod system without at least a week or two testing on none impactful systems. Major security patches could be done quicker but were never applied to prod first.
All changes had a defined rollback procedure, might not have worked in this instance with the machines not booting correctly but I'm sure there are a lot of sysadmins updating their policies incase this happens again.
If it seemed like the journalists cared about what ads were displayed and didn't just stick ad boxes from major ad services then I'd be more inclined to allow them.
It would probably work better for the advertised product/company too with the potential customer knowing that they are being targeted by an actual person instead of an algorithm. Also, knowing that their advert won't appear next to something which would be damaging to be associated with.
Reminds me of a story of my Dad's...
He was setting up a call center so ordered two lines in with one being the backup in case anything happened to the first.
All went well until some digging work was happening in the car park. One scoop later, all comms went out in the building... both lines were cut in one go.
IIRC the result after a lot of shouting was fees refunded and a new line put in by the provider to the other side of the building at no extra cost.
One thing I would like on the cancellation screen is the date the subscription ends if I click cancel now.
It would avoid the annoying bit where I want to cancel on day one but want the rest of the month that I paid for. The text used is generally so ambiguous that you can't tell if the service is going to stop now or tater.
I can understand how they say you need to delete your account and other things to keep it safe but I wonder how members of group chats are kept.
If they use a list of phone numbers to maintain the membership then it is unlikely deleting your account would take you out of the group.
This just goes to show that phone number is a terrible key... one person can have more than one phone number and one phone number can belong to more than one person (hopefully at different periods of time)
Why can't Netflix move to the model employed by other streaming services where everyone has their own username and can be added to a group plan?
For example in Spotify, I have an account, my sister has an account and pays for multiuser. I am a named user on that multiuser account so I get premium.
The main issue I have with password sharing on Netflix is the password sharing part of it.
It is an evolution of how we search for information on the internet which currently seems to rely scraping information from a web page and then sending you to that page.
A lot of work would need to be done to stop opinions from being presented (especially out of context) but in theory it would revolutionise fact finding by giving a brief answer and then links to more indepth information about the subject.
A hood (soft or reinforced), attached to a top (t-shirt, sweat shirt or other object commonly worn on the top half of the body) with an AR display taking up some to all of the open area of the hood. The hardware can be stored in the hood, neckbank or top. Additional inputs such as a rear facing camera or a hole in the head are supplemental and should be patented before Facebook decides sticking a camera on the back of a hat is another possible revenue stream.
Don't forget, coming soon™ the AR balaclava, handy for avoiding police and cracking safes whilst keeping your identity secret.
The main issues I've had with GDPR are companies refusing to tell me anything because I haven't actively subscribed to them. As an example, my broadband price went up by £5 per month but I wasn't told as I had failed to opt in to marketing emails. After speaking to them, GDPR was blamed for being unable to communicate price changes to me.
The other issue is how much effort having to opt out of tracking manually on most websites I visit. On sites I have opted out before, there is no indication this was saved. The usual accept and continue banner is displayed at the bottom of the screen but when I go into the consent options, they can be opted out or they could be opted in.
I have been getting much better ads though... now I've opted out of targetted ads where I can.
I have found that for a lot of sites where I just want to read a short news article, I have to spend at least twice as long going through accepting/rejecting tracking than I do reading the article.
I often think I'd rather have annoying adverts which fill half the screen (but don't track) than go through disabling tracking each time.
I see children when I'm working behind a bar, so does that mean every member of bar/waiting on or even shop staff has to have a CRB check? This will stop a lot of students and other casual labour from applying for these sorts of jobs and probably increase the number of unemployed youths and reduce the number of people who can afford to go through university.
Smells more and more like big brother is watching you.
At the cycling issue, I cycled round a corner last night to find 5 or 6 people walking along in a line across the entire width of the road. I had to go into the mud at the side because even after ringing my bell they did not even look round to see me. I expect it would have been my fault if I had hit them and I did not want to risk it.