Re: Too many to mention them all....
Ah yes! Installing the first ever Windows from multiple floppies where the Reset Button and Disk Eject button were smack bang next to each other! :/
158 publicly visible posts • joined 14 Aug 2006
Working in IT for a bank our small team took it in turns to be on site for the duration but all of us were still expected to be on call as we all had our own sub-areas of experience and expertise including knowing the best team member to contact for any given type of issue (lot of in-house bespoke software in play). Had a decent remuneration in return ramping up to quad time for on site hours and double time for on-call time if called upon, single time if not. But thankfully, due to our due diligence, the event passed us by without a hitch so the only downside was having to moderate our celebratory Y2K drink.
Now, about those neutrino hits on the computer core causing the occasional inexplicable system failure ...
Reminds me of when the guy who built our in-house project management PERT system left and the boss was casting around for someone who could take over looking after it. I joking commented that I had recently seen an Open University programme on the BBC2 about PERT and BANG! I got landed with the job - accidentally dropping the huge stack of punch cards that defined a project was the least of my worries.
The one time I was involved in a "loss" of audit trail records was when about 14,000 transactions appeared to be missing from the audit trail tapes and was detected by the end of day reconciliation runs (which showed they were doing their job). We investigated and found the missing transactions had been written beyond the EOT (end of tape) marker and so were being ignored. It was down to me to swiftly write a quick and dirty utility to retrieve said transactions and build a copy of the reel in question patching the missing transactions on the end plus rebuilding the directory reels to reflect the new tape numbers used (master and backup). Not the longest or hardest all nighter (it took a few hours to run the rebuild while I kipped under the desk) but one to remember.
Been having a similar problem with my aging laptop with the trackpad not working or working intermittently. Finally figured it out that resting the heel of my hands on the case next to the touchpad was causing the problem with a slight deflection of the case causing unintended signals in the touchpad.
No arguments against it? What about when driving happily along on with nothing in front of you and the sensor is triggered by a phantom fly or speck of dust and you get tail-ended by an HGV?
This happens regularly on our work vans - happily just the first bit and in this case all the seosor does is flash up a red warning light with a beep. I would *not* want it touching the brakes!
How the heck can someone drive an apparently identical car for 10/15 minutes without realising it was the wrong car?. As soon as I sit in my car after the garage has done some work on it I know this is not the car I left them with as the seat and steering wheel positions are not the same. It would be an extraordinary coincidence for the mechanic who worked on my car to be the same size and shape as me with the same driving position preferences.
Reminds me of an operator running some trainees through some basic commands on the console of our Sperry/Unisys mainframe. But of course not actually hitting Enter for those commands which could cause an issue. Finally he got round to showing them the command to reboot by keying in $! (Dollar-Bang), forgetting that this was the one command that did *not* need you to hit Enter for it to be actioned! :o
I would assert that "THESE INSTRUCTIONS" is ambiguous as it could refer to just the instructions before the the start of the questions.More instructions after the questions start could be quite rightly construed to be not part the "THESE INSTRUCTIONS" referred to.
So they have a delivery driver down at 71%. If they mean they can get the goods delivered 71% of the way then they are way under what should be currently possible. However the difficult bit that I don't see automation being able to handle in the foreseeable future is moving the goods that last 1% of the way over rough ground, between badly parked vehicles, through stiff lobby doors, up tight twisty stairs to the customer's door. Not happening.
As a delivery driver of many years experience 99% of the time the problem lies with the customer who fail to have adequately clear signage as to where they live. OK, if they live in a communal building then it may be down to the management company / housing trust / etc which have failed to sign which of several blocks is which or which is the entrance to particular flat numbers but in that case the residents should be complaining to them to get it sorted rather than moan about delivery drivers left wondering which mole hill is which.
BTW putting a house number on the side of the house or on an open gate neither of which is visible from the road is not a clever idea. Nor is allowing that bush in the garden to overgrow the house sign.
Finally, delivery instructions which say it is the house with the blue car on the drive is not much good if the car is not there or it is a dark evening on an unlit village road. Nor instructions which say it is the third house in the left but which do not say which direction that is coming from.
My own experience of something similar is much more mundane. Lent a USB charging cable to someone at an outdoor event who neglected to tell me they had dropped it in a puddle. Next thing I know the USB socket on my phone is borked! :(
Spent the next seven years using only wireless charging and Bluetooth or FTP file transfers until I eventually got a new phone last month.
Where I worked if we had exhaustively (and exhaustingly) eliminated all possible other reasons for a one-off, irreproducible glitch then we wrote it off as a "neutrino hit on the computer processor". In other words we had managed to do something that none of the well thought out and designed experiments that have been running for many, many years had managed to do in detecting one of the little blighters! :)
My TV does not nag me about anything. But then I just use it as a TV and choose which channels and which programmes I want to use. If I don't like what I see I choose something else.
So I am unclear as what the OP's problem is? Is it the TV itself doing this to him or is it one or more of the (not so) "smart" apps that are installed?
Look on the bright side: The smeary screen may be the result of being de-sanitised used a liquid cleaner which leaves a deposit as it dries.
These days I never use my fingertips on any public touch screen or keyboard but use a knuckle instead then use the de-sanitiser provided as I leave the store (use it on the way in to protect others from me and on the way out to protect me from others).