Agree that one thing I am jealous of is the quality of Facetime calls between my wife and various of her friends, and wish it was available cross platform.
But that in its own right is insufficient to make me want to shell out for a bowl of fruit.
292 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Jul 2008
1. Please ask once politely if I want to download an update system
2. If I do, ask once politely if I want to upgrade and make it clear my toy may turn to sludge if I do
Cut the backdoor downloads and incessant update whining and leave me in peace
Nope, I do not have a fruity toy, but the wife does and boy, is she mad. So I don't care what the vultures at Apple do, until I get it in the neck from my non tech average user wife. Which is now.
Screw you Apple. I can't sue you here. But I shall enjoy converting as many of your users as I can to something else. Don't get mad. Get even
"I own Windows 7"
Errr no you don't... you have a tightly controlled licence to use it.
Price hikes.... did anyone seriously believe that Microsoft wouldn't turn the screws to extract more profit for shareholders once they got sufficient users ?
They run a business, not a charity. Unlike the Chocolate Factory they do not have the advertising revenue stream and have to make the ROI somewhere.
Windows 10 users will feel it in the wallet eventually. It's just a matter of time to get enough users hooked. Anyone who believes otherwise must also believe in fairy tales !
Think you have got the common misconception that your MEPs hold the power. Quite simply they don't. Neither really does the Commission.
Note where all the 'escape clauses' come from... the real power in Europe which is the Council of Ministers... i.e. your elected representatives....
Living in Europe as I do I have no problems with 'Europe'. The issue I have is that it is controlled by governments each fighting for their own agenda (and their paymasters) in preference to Europe as a whole.
Until national governments cede proper control to the European Parliament including finance et al (yes, a properly federated United States I guess) then the infighting does nothing but work against the better interests of the majority of people.
Currently we have a half way house that just doesn't really work that well. It 'could' be so much better. But no government is going to give up their bit of power, unless THEY are the ones who can get themselves to be leaders of the whole of Europe. They spent too long climbing greasy poles to be able to see a wider vision and do what is right rather than what is in their own self interest.
After all, if they are no longer seen as powerful, where would all the perks go ?
Downvotes expected for being pro Europe :-)
Actually I believe the biggest change in law/insurance happened in the 90s when after a lot of campaigning by the Law Society on behalf of solicitors, solicitors were allowed to work on a "no cure, no fee basis".
At the time I worked in marine insurance recovery. We were not solicitors so could work "no cure no fee". Our costs and fees were low, we were good at what we did and succesful, and the solicitors hated that.
Even worse was we frequently had to deal with solicitors and took the useless overpaid idiots to the cleaners regularly. We just made them look stupid.
As a work colleague said to me at the time "it'll be like the US in a few years with every solicitor chasing ambulances and no one taking any personal responsibilty anymore. Everyone will sue for everything and that will drive premiums through the roof"
Prophetic words indeed.
Most people miss the point about F1. It was always was, is, and always will be a manufacturers championship. Thats where the $$ is.
The constructors championship is what it is all about. The drivers championship is just a side show.
I have long said they ought to have a separate drivers championship race in the morning in equal cars. But then no one would watch the 'main event' so that will never fly.
As I say to friends who are bemused by it 'If you want to watch cutting edge technology thrashed within an atom of its life then watch F1. If you want to watch racing then watch another formula'
Personally I love and watch F1 for what it really is - a technological race... the only real interest is which member of a team wins as they are the only drivers really racing one another.
To get my racing kicks I watch other stuff.
The only positive thing to say about it is I remember going racing with a touring car team in the late 80s to Silverstone (before they ruined it) where we were support for F1. I asked the team where I should go and watch F1 qualifying for the first time and they said the inside of the old Becketts. 'And tell us what you think about F1 drivers when you get back'.
The slow cars came out first, down Hangar straight at approaching 200mph and then hearing them lift and turn in. Impressive.
And then the big boys came out. Flat all the way. He'll lift any second, he'll lift any sec......... errrr f*ck he never lifted. How the HELL did he do that ? And again. And faster. OMG....
After an hour I got back somewhat shellshocked at what I had seen. 'So what do you think?' said they.
"They are not like us.... I'm not sure if they are entirely sane"
"Ah" said they. "Now you understand.... "
So forget the racing. Qualifying is the best bit. One man, one ridiculous machine, one lap, balls out. Wrestling with a demon in a way that us mortals cannot possibly conceive.
For me thats what makes F1 great :-)
Sure it would have been different if it was the casino at risk of losing cash.
A few punters losing a few bob is a normal day in the office for a casino.
Also ironic bearing mind the level of security they employ on the floor to ensure they don't get fleeced. NSA eat your heart out.
Hang em up and leave em to sway in the breeze.
Think you will find that ferries typically run 'medium speed' diesels with variable pitch props as against bigger deep sea ships which run low speed diesels (90-130rpm 2 stroke reversible). It is a much better system for short trip rapid turnaround vessels.
The low speed ones use higher grade fuel for manouvering when decent response is required say in port, but once up to speed at sea they switch to 'bunker oil'. Which is far less refined and hence hugely cheaper.
So by all means run cleaner diesel. But your import costs will rise on all your lovely chinese imports.
Also AFAIAA large ships are hugely more efficient per tonne/mile carried than any alternatives.
Steam is great for power efficiency but the cost for making it is high due to inefficient boilers and hence few if any steam turbine ships are about today.
Not that as an ex navigator I know much about engine rooms :-)
Yeah the Facebook 'we give nothing away' was painful too watch....
I was wondering how he could lie with such a straight face. Ex poker player perhaps ?
:-)
Think the biggest problem was the interviewer was working on a subject way too complicated for him, compounded by then trying to explain that to the masses in 30 mins. Had to stop several times to explain various relevant points to my son due to errors or omissions...
>Also irrelevant - the law is as >written, and is nothing to do >with what anyone says the >"spirit" or the "intent" is.
Not quite right I think.
The law is as written indeed, but often wording can be ambiguous and the judges (in the higher courts) are there to decide what the intent was as you may note when cases are appealed on a 'point of law'.
Plenty of references to this online.
Spirits can go whistle obviously !
*Container ships use stuff so awful it has to be heated up to get it to flow through the injectors.
Not just container ships, but pretty well any large ocean going ship.
If I remember rightly the main reason for running lighter 'cleaner' fuel (on a low speed 2 stroke diesel engine) was better start/stop & low speed response when manouvering.
Didn't matter on a steamship with oil injected boilers though.
But yes it did have to be heated either way.
Can't remember now if we used tank heaters to get it out of the tanks like you have to for crude oil. But yes, heavy 'bunker' oil was pretty messy stuff.
Ahh... fun times at sea in my yoof..... Lash me to the bar. Mines another large one :-)
Usually the statute of limitations would be 6 years if memory hasn't failed me, though there may be extenuating circumtances which may extend or reduce that.
In this instance it is probably falls under something like 'contract misrepresentation'.
Normally you would have to prove the manufacturer was at fault, but that's been done. Simply speaking if you bought it within 6 years VW are going to have to cough in one way or another and no excuses.
Happy to be corrected by a knowledgeable solicitor type as I'm very rusty on this stuff.
Making OpenReach available to the public might help.
Thry are shielded away where you can't put a round of fucks into the bastards.
You CAN get stuff done with BT if you are an obnoxious determined persustent bastard like me, but most understandably just can't be bothered.
I now get top line support with a personal mobile number and phenomenal customer support from BT. None of that online help shite. But virtually had to threaten to decapitate someone to get it.
OpenReach engineers (if they turn up - at least with me they do now) are generally pretty good. But the management are just beancounters trying to up their percentage rates.
Fix the easiest thing closest to the exchange.
They need to be on the end of the phone with bastards like me haranguing them for anything to change :-)
Olympics....Think it was enacted circa 1995 or so. A lot longer ago you than you would think, and that probably applies in most countries too.
2012 stuff was enacted about 1/2 a second after the Olympics were awarded.
Can't remember specifically now but as we are in the promotional mechandise business it cost us a fortune in orders that customers wanted but we could not process/accept. People just didn't order anything at all..... a huge loss to the economy (leave aside what you think of promo products !!)
Queenie was much better doing an open licence for the Diamond Jubilee. Just a shame it could not be combined with games.
Olympics was a scam of the highest degree and still makes my blood boil.
Think they reckoned it was doing 100mph by the time it cleared the tower.
No matter. Numbers will never do a Saturn V justice.
It's like trying to describe say a Ferrari.
I remember well watching launches as a kid. Mind numbing. Awe inspiring. I was 'there' when they stepped on the moon. I felt I held hands with the planet during Apollo 13. Amazing times.
I think it was Michael Collins who when asked what it was like to ride one said something like
"Imagine being strapped to the top of the biggest firework man ever built, they lit the blue touch paper, and then watched from the safety of their bunkers...."
Damn. Come on. Do it again....
Reckon pigs will fly before I see an update from my carrier. They just aren't interested. Sold you the phone and taken the cash. Then only interested in upselling services.
It's a friggin disgrace but no idea how we can get the bastards to budge.
What would people do if Dell supplied you a Windows box but never pushed you any Windoes updates ?
IMHO Google should be kicking the crap out of carriers. But they don't much seem to care either. They have assimilated you. Got your data.
And I thought Windows 10 was a mess. Makes M$ look good.
Ah so this is why why the useless fuckers can't supply my son (a sapper) with decent kit meaning he has to resort to buying his own if he wants something that's any good.
Might possibly be the best trained soldiers, but that's no good with piss poor kit.
And having dealt with Bristol I can confirm they are a useless bunch of pricks who were probably unemployable elsewhere.
Best place to start cuts is in the MoD civil servants.
Goat well and truly gotten
Same issue for employee at home in Chelmsford on Tuesday.
Own router. Seemed to be a routing issue. Pings at 1sec seemed ok but huge packet loss if I tried 0.01 sec. Traceroutes disappeared into the ether.
She gave up and went to the office 20 miles away, and BT, but ok.
They had apparently been noticing similar issues for a few days but assumed it was a.n.other problem.
Joy
"Running the lifeboats is similarly (and to the mystification of other nations) in the UK left to charity. But while the fundraising is national that also really works because the crews are coming from small communities and are welded together socially."
As a crew and helm for the RNLI for 15 years it is indeed a unique organisation.
I believe that there was an attempt for a limited period in the 1970s to have it run by government, but as with many government projects, it was just another department that could have its costs cut as civil servants and their masters saw fit.
The RNLI management felt that this was not in the best interests of the Institution and decided to become completely independent again.
What is amazing is the that the management have a rolling program to visit every station about once every 5 years to meet the workers at the coal face. Having sat in on a couple of meetings face to face with the top brass it was amazing to be able to say exactly what you thought with no fear of reproach, and then seeing ideas mooted put in to practice.
As the then Chief Exec said "You have to tell us what you need. Our job is to provide it. You risk your lives for free. Our job is make sure you have the best equipment we can find to make your job as easy and safe as possible. If we are getting it wrong then tell us to our faces."
I can't imagine many organisations anywhere that have that level of interaction between the top and the bottom.
It is not the sort of attitude you get in government run bodies (ask anyone in the Armed Services..... I have two relatives 'in' and the treatment of our serving soldiers/sailors/airmen is quite frankly atrocious)
I still fail to understand how the Institution does what it does and raise the level of money that it does - I am sure Tim has a theory on how it works economically ! Yes, the crews are local and tightly welded but I think that there is quite a degree of separation of them from the largest body of donations.
The biggest chunk does indeed come from legacies, but that is in the decline and has been for some time (I remember discussing it at one of those meetings probably 15 or 20 years ago), presumably due to social changes. Hence they have turned to other ways of raising funds. Note that the Institutions financial planning extends something like 50 years ahead....
What is most staggering is going to the annual RNLI presentations in London where fund raisers and crew are honoured. I was pretty well in tears most of the time. Little ladies from some small village who had barely been to the seaside, let alone been to sea, spending 50 years collecting safety pins for scrap or somesuch and raising 10s and 10s of thousands of pounds. We loudly applauded every single one. My hands hurt for days, but it was worth it.
Why do they do it ? There is an emotive link somewhere I guess. Island nation, tales of derring-do on the high seas by 'heroic volunteers' (read 'idiots like me' !!!) etc.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynmouth_Lifeboat_Station for instance
It truly is an amazing organisation. One of which I was proud to be a member of. But what makes it all possible is the phenomenal support of the public. To everyone of you who has ever put a penny in a box, or ridden, or walked, or jumped, or shaved your head for the RNLI, a huge thank you from me for all your support.
28th July. Booked my holiday for a week. So I don't have to answer the phone to all the muppets who decide to try and upgrade.
'But my computer kept telling me too....'
I know quite a few people round here on a shared low bandwidth long range wifi connection who are going to get a shock.
As well as the ones with ADSL on the wrong end of a long phone line.
The Microdoft job creation software just keeps getting better :-)
No wonder I can't find anyone to fill a nice little coding job with lots of opportunities. Young people are obviously smarter than their CVs show, and they have decided to find a job where they don't sliced and diced for a handful of gravel a day and blamed when the house of straw collapses :-)
I wouldn't mind, and I agree completely with the sentiments expressed, but as a slightly unusual small business I have always strenuously fought the boss (read wife) to ensure we don't cut corners with our IT.
So I have a nice little job with good resources and no one interested in filling it. Apart from a few wannabees who 'can do Word' and 'want to be a games programmer'- the painful result of completely misguided IT education policies :-)
For small businesses... Freeagent (I have no $$$ connection whatsoever) is possibly worth a look. We swapped from Line 50 and not looked back. Worked well with our accountants reporting software.
Other thing that is still largely under the radar is full on Samba 4 (not the cutdown version in RHEL 7). Have a look at the sernet packages.
No it won't enable you to replace 2003 with *nix but interesting nonetheless....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jYXWQ0pYpZM
Just saying.... so please don't frag me :-)
Yup in the early days Google were great, or better than the competition (ahhhh... those heady days of Archie Gopher Altavista Excite Lycos Yahoo et al!)
But now they are just another listing site trying to shove shopping and other listing sites (that they probably own) down my throat. Selling what they want you to buy, not supplying the information you seek
I only use them in desperation these days if DDG doesn't give me a sensible answer.
I hate having to climb through 5 pages of guff to possibly get what you might be looking for instead of what they want you to see.
Or you get two links, both in Chinese :-)
Heroes to zeroes IMHO. Shame. Great idea.... but the call of filthy lucre bought out the morals.
Come on peeps. You're missing the point. This is a strategic work generation program. If it was perfect there would be no need for puter mechanics and lots of IT bods would be out of a job.
You should be praising MS for releasing shit to keep food on your tables.
Personally I'm pleased I run no Windows boxen. Allows me to do something constructive with my life... :-)
ROFLMAO....
Reasoned debate is good to read whether I agree or not.
I generally enjoy your columns Tim, but please leave the hysterical headlines, political opinions and slagging off to the rags where it belongs. Stick to your economics as I am not interested in your political views.
Shame we can't down vote an article... -1 from me.
"So perhaps the disenchantment in Britain stems from the fact that we're not allowed to engage in any democratically meaningful way."
You forget that the it is the goverment WE elect (for better or worse) that appoints and dictates to the officials that set policy. So you do have a some influence. Regrettably nowhere near enough because the politicians want you to be worried about the health service or whatever. Smoke ans mirrors.
Yes, the problem with Europe is there is no democracy but that is because goverments will not cede their authority to the democratically (and proportionally represented) EU Parliament.
If people could overcome their xenophobia and understand the best way to run Europe is via the democratically elected parliament life might be a tad easier. The current system is a mess. But the voters get swayed by emotive (and largely irrelevant) subjects like immigration so they don't see the objective issues like democracy.
And I can't see national politicians wanting to give up the power they spent years climbing greasy poles to achieve.....
This is not about what is best for you, me, or the nation. Purely what is best for your politicians.
Waiting for the downvotes of UKIP supporters....