Real? Misleading?
Where's the evidence that Oracle "secured building permits for a trio of small modular reactors (SMRs) to power a datacenter"? This article links to another that doesn't mention 'nuclear' at all. I've looked for a record of an Oracle earnings call on Sep 9, and found it with some difficulty. Search for "Oracle Corporation - Q1 FY25 Earnings". It requires registration and won't be up long; I grabbed some sound bites. Larry starts talking 31 minutes into the call. He initially talks about huge data centers, but I heard no mention of nuclear, 'till the Q&A. 45 minutes into the call, he says: We're in the middle of designing a data center. A > 1 GW data center; they already have location and power. They've already got the building permits for 3 nuclear reactors. These are the SMR that power the data center. This is how crazy it's getting. So he says "they've", not "we've". I think there's some telephone being played or people are playing fast and loose with terminology. I also see that other's are running with the story anyway. Saw one report, "Oracle’s founder did not elaborate on the location for the data center or any construction timelines. Power Engineering has reached out to the company for more details and will report back when we learn more."
I agree that Thorium-base molten salt small modular reactor is the most promising technical path to carry nuclear energy into the new era of meeting the market demand, but I can't believe ones already got a building permit. On the other hand, a building permit is not an operation permit. That's probably the hardest one to get?