Re: Yes...
It's probably a walrus.
6262 publicly visible posts • joined 18 Apr 2007
A dozen years ago I was made redundant and spent a year writing a Master's thesis for the Open University: the degree I received was titled "Computing for Commerce and Industry".
Although I wrote code - lots of it - to demonstrate and prove my thesis, not one line of that code appeared in the final document, and nor was any of it assessed.
While I would not dare to speak for Americans as a class, I have noticed a number of times recently that there seems to be a usage of 'tyre' (or possibly 'tire') to refer to both the black rubber bit, and the complete assembly with the metal bit in the middle and the rubber bit around it.
Is it possible that this is simply a case of that usage?
Which is the major reason I use Mint.
It's not that it's intrinsically better or worse than other interfaces (for some value of better or worse) but that it's better for _me_.
(Though there are still some holes in the Mint world, particularly around the operation of menu bars).
Why the hell do Southern Water (or indeed any utility company) need to collect any personally identification? You are buying services from them; the only thing they need to know is (a) an address and (b) that the money keeps coming in. Some sort of customer number to link payments to location might be handy, but that is all they *need* until such time as you wish to terminate their service. At that point, it's reasonable that they require some sort of evidence that *you* are a person who has a right to terminate it (wouldn't want any Tom, Dick, or Harry turning my water off!) but it's *not* reasonable that they keep any such identifiable documentation... yes, send us a scan of your rates bill with your name and address, and we will note on our database that this was the document used to identify you.
What possible reason can there be to gather this sort of identification other than for this final case?
Fortunately, my ancient black and white Brother 2150N continues to print without caring what third party toner cartridge goes in, every five or six years. Now if only I could persuade the cartridge suppliers that actually, thank you, I *don't* need another cartridge every couple of weeks...
I was wondering about how to execute code from such a chip: my thought was that the obvious way to do this would be to send some randomish number to the chip, which performs some transformation magic and sends it back; if the printer gets back the (transformed) code it's expecting, then it's happy. So in that scenario, perhaps the rogue chip returns a lot more data, crashes the stack, and executes something on the return?
It would still need to get something into the printer's system that could be executed... but of course, since everything is unnecessarily connected to the intarwebs these days...
I had the enviable task of identifying every piece of equipment in the BBC World Service, discovering whether it had a computer/controller in it, and if so, confirming either that it had no date handling or that it could cope with Y2k. Most of it wasn't an issue. But I also had to sort out a couple of HP Unix boxes and it was quickly ascertained that the current OS couldn't handle it, and that the hardware couldn't handle the next OS which could. There were two suitable computers in the country, which we bought; I had to manage getting them to the site (not on the same truck!) and the new OS installed and tested.
That done, I went and spent Y2k new year on Copacabana beach with six million partying Brazilians.
I despair.
What an unmitigatedly pointless system. Delivery by air for those poor unfortunates who can't plan both a dinner party *and* the food required ahead of time? Or for those imbeciles who can't cope with a couple of days wait between ordering something and having it delivered? Even ignoring the risk to other air users (and as indicated, ground users too) this is nothing more than a self-aggrandizing waste of resources.
That's rather my point. As I approached retirement age I discussed this with my doctor, as to whether I would be likely to need my pension pot for years or if I should just pull it out and blow it on fast cars and fast women. He suggested that with three grandparents who reached a hundred (and one who died of silicosis in his eighties) and two parents going strong at the time in their eighties, I probably had a healthy set of genes irrespective of other issues.
Also, do I prefer my water delivered through plastic pipes (or plastic bottles) containing microplastics, or through lead[0] pipes as in days of yore? (I don't buy bottled water and I don't filter what comes out of the tap. My landlord thinks I'm crazy but last time I checked I wasn't dead yet.)
[0] Other metals are available, e.g. copper or iron, but I think lead is the least friendly.
Hmm. Which would I rather buy? A shiny new windows laptop with AS installed? Or last year's top end model, recycled by some exec who simply has to have the latest and greatest?
Hint: option two, followed by the immediate installation of penguins, is my normal way of buying computers...
The snag with this kind of approach is the same as that with massive prison sentences. It's often satisfying when some miscreant is sentenced to one but its hard to say how well such sentences - even capital punishment - works as a deterrent. Clearly it's not 100% or you wouldn't have huge prisons full of sentenced prisoners. Obviously the prisoners (assuming guilt) either didn't know about the scale of sentence they could expect (unlikely), they felt the reward was worth the risk, or they (most likely, I think) thought they would never be caught.
I agree entirely that these cyber attackers should disappear, but I'm not convinced that this approach is going to work for many of them. It's certainly not going to work for state actors; it's hard to see, for example, retribution actually happening in say North Korea or Russia.
Speaking from a position of complete ignorance, I might suggest better compartmentalisation of access to the data, and most likely a damn sight less data being collected and retained in the first place? I know that's not going to work when the target is something like a hospital, but it might be a start...
Neil
plus automatic lights and wipers are great.
For some, I suppose; personally I find them both disturbing to use, and quite often wrong. I see many modern cars - presumably with auto lights since the light switch doesn't appear to have an 'off' position any more - driving in poor visibility but bright conditions and no headlights. I can only assume that the automatics have decided it's bright enough not to need lights...
And - this is purely a personal thing, I suspect - I find the can't-make-it's-mind-up aspect of intermittent auto wipers extremely distracting. I much prefer a constant beat, or a constant delay between sweeps, to the automatics idea of nah, not raining enough yet, oooh, let's go double speed, sweep, pause, sweep, pause, sweep, pause-and-a-half, sweep. It does my head in.
For lights, though, I don't know why they bother fitting a switch at all; there is never an occasion while the car is moving when if sidelights are required, dipped beams are also required. And few good reasons not to have the lights on in the daytime; just leave the damn things on all the time. (Fiat have arranged for years that when the ignition is off, the lights are off, so they can be left switched on all the time; my current Renault does the same and a recent rental Citroen (horrible in almost every respect until the automatics were turned off) did the same.)