Parachute
Thanks for clarifying that; it seemed such an obvious thing if only to give someone standing underneath it when it decides to come down time to step smartly to one side.
A ton and a half landing on you can ruin your whole day.
6255 publicly visible posts • joined 18 Apr 2007
We have an allegedly 'intelligent' bit of software which is basically regurgitating scraps of texts its training found to be close to each other in existing text, and people are surprised that it regurgitates unsafe code - of which I'm sure there's an awful lot in its training data?
Is this any different from autogenerating hate speech and abuse, for exactly the same reasons?
And did no-one notice that the hand on the foremost person's left shoulder (viewers right) appears to have the thumb at the wrong side (bottom of the image). In fact, it looks as if the rearmost person has two right hands (a trick not replicated since the cover art for Jim Steinman's album Bad For Good).
I have a Samsung monitor here which cheerfully goes into standby when the computer goes to sleep, then wakes itself up for a couple of seconds... to tell that it's going to sleep.
I suppose it makes as much sense as the power led on the TV which goes off when the thing is turned on, and turns on when the TV is turned off, with random flashing in the wee small hours - I assume when it has a bit of a sulk upon discovering that it can't contact the mothership.
Some years ago a traffic police friend pointed out that the half-life of a car on the hard shoulder is about twelve minutes before someone drives an HGV into it. Stay in the car, or even on the same side of the barrier as the traffic, is not a wise move...
four spinning LiDAR sensors, six radar sensors, fourteen cameras, and eight ultrasonic sensors, and assorted telemetry sensors monitoring the wheels, steering, brakes, and so on.
And yet the fleshy meatbags manage with just two (sometimes fewer!) eyes and the seat of their pants... sounds like these robot thingies have some way to go.
that we're starting to see entry-level (at least) ARM chips having some availability, even in development/hobby quantities, after a couple of years of 'stock: 0; expected 9/2023'... not all yet, by a long shot, but stock is finding its way back into the channels. Maybe we'll start to see the Pi available again?
An issue that arose when we were doing the PARIS and LOHAN stuff was that by agreement, domestic GPS receiver chips are designed not to work if they're moving too high and too fast, precisely to avoid their use in guided/cruise missile scenarios.
Since we needed one that would work at high altitude (though low speed) we had to find a chip where the maker had actually used 'AND' instead of 'OR' in their logic, which it seemed at the time many did.
I wonder if it comes in two packs? The flatpack cardboard, and the electronics/motors/batteries?
I can see situations where removing the electronics from an airframe which is full of holes, has had a hard landing, or just plain too many flights through rain and has gone soggy, makes a lot of sense - and they already point out you can mix and match parts. The cost of the cardboard should be effectively two tenths of bugger all.
In Berlin, the problem seems less of moving interaction - there are many shared cycle/pedestrian paths and most people stick to their bit, wheels or otherwise - but of people just dumping the things in the footway when they're bored with them.
My wife was recently fairly severely injured - surgery required - after tripping over one such dumped scooter; she is, I suspect, not alone.
I wonder if they're thinking about following this policy on low-level processors/controllers? That's going to upset a *lot* of people; there are illions upon illions of just-smart-enough with just-enough-pins and just-enough-peripherals out there. Managing that would be a complete nightmare.
As a previous commenter said: brace for RISC-V.
Time to look more seriously at RISC-V dev boards.
Reminds me of the good ole days[tm] on alt.folklore.computers when people would argue about some fine point of C semantics, and DMR would weigh in with a flat statement about it.
Which of course led to the question: "What makes you think you know about it?"...
I don't see a spinning structure as any more complex than a stationary one, other than the need to rotate any incoming craft at the same rate and dock at the hub. Which may lead to a design for an exit in the side of an incoming craft rather than the nose?
It'll make it heavier, sure, but that's just engineering; it's effectively a suspension bridge, no? Or a bicycle wheel? It needs to be able to support its own weight against whatever value is chosen for effective gravity but that's not difficult.
Hmm, if only they'd carried all those shuttle fuel tanks to orbit and joined them nose to tail.
Instead of using the ground, as it were, as the ground?
Given that trolley busses and trams require effectively diagonal wires to avoid the lines cutting through the collectors, steering them is going to be interesting.
With apologies for the paraphrasing of Douglas Adams (I can't find the original quote):
1) defence: I'm going to kill you because you're trying to kill me
2) revenge: I'm going to kill you because you killed my brother
3) diplomacy: I'm going to kill my brother and then kill you on the pretext that you did it.
with the Fernwärme district heating systems that are common in Germany (and to which our house is attached). Although the heat load is obviously less in summer than winter, the same hot water delivery provides both house heating and hot water (via a heat exchanger in the cellar) so there is a year-round requirement for heating at source.
It's a long time since I've had to look at my copy of the construction and use regulations for vehicles upon the queen's highway - but having built a car or two I was once intimately familiar with them. Regarding speedos, in the UK as stated by jdiebdhidbsusbvwbsidnsoskebid a speedo may not under-read and must no over-read by more than (iirc) 15%. So in practice, a manufacturer will design his speedo to work around 7.5% fast. The indicated speed decreases with respect to actual speed as the tyres wear, though not by much, and the older design cable-driven speedos were fighting a non-linear induced magnetic effect against a vaguely linear spring and I think resulted in an S-shaped response.
With all that going on, even though they could get a speed accurate to a couple of decimal places these days, I don't think anyone actually does.
Surely if it's merely deprecated, that should be a warning, not an error?
adjective:
- spoken or written about with disapproval: The much deprecated preference of poorer people for less nutritious white bread over brown has to do with price as well as palatability.
- Computers. (of a software version or feature) marked as not recommended for users and developers because of the risk of damage or compromised security, the existence of superior alternatives, or an impending upgrade: This routine removes all deprecated tags and obsolete elements from the code, replacing them where appropriate.
But anyway, I still haven't forgiven MS for the replacement of known unsafe C calls with equally unsafe (but you feel better about them) calls.