Re: Hold up!
But what is it in Linguine?
1776 publicly visible posts • joined 26 Jun 2008
What is there to gain? Well there's a possibility that the damage is minor enough that flight operations could potentially continue. They might also redefine altitude limits - pushing the boundaries to see what is possible. Testing to destruction achieves a lot, but they can't do that on an otherwise viable craft.
What is there to lose? It's not like anyone is ever going to go retrieve it and salvage parts.
As it is now scrap, why not command it to spin up as fast as possible and fly as high as possible just to see what happens? OK, it will vibrate terribly but as a final farewell it could be an exciting experiment.
Still a fantastic achievement to get this thing off the ground in the first place though.
> "Since we all know the cliché about what happens when you assume, we will not repeat it here"
From a software engineering/tinkering point of view... bravo. That's quite an achievement to add support for quite radically different processors.
From a practical point of view... how many people are going to want to pay the apple hardware premium but not want the apple software stack?? It strikes me as having a real-world (i.e. not just for tinkering) market of 2, maybe 3 people. (and I use linux daily, on several devices, albeit relatively cheap devices)
It's impossible for C to be better than assembler for any specific case. When you run C through the compiler, the output IS assembler. So if a human was skilled enough (extremely unlikely now) they could product assembly code that's just as good. (Or indeed if you're skilled enough with your butterfly - 378)
HOWEVER
The overarching benefit of C (or any other high level language) is that it's processor agnostic. Assembly needs to be written for each target architecture, whereas in C the compiler deals with that (mostly)
In other parts of the world they don't have the infrastructure/service provider segmentation we have here. If ProviderA wants to provide service somewhere, they need to install the wires.
Mines tend to be somewhat remote, so I imagine the install fees would be quite high.
Openreach have different SLAs available to ISPs. Business grade connections are prioritised higher than residential. Leased lines are even higher. Yes, you'd still be "waiting for openreach" but that wait would be a lot shorter.
If it were 10 separate ISPs on the openreach infrastructure, there would be one cable fault taking out the whole bundle. That is not resilience.
Also, openreach aren't the only game in town; they're just the most well known and most widely deployed. If you're prepared to pay, there are lots of providers who have their own infrastructure that they can roll out to you. The fee may well be in the £millions though.
It's not collusion per se. It's that the regulator ruled that inflation+3.9% was the maximum they could increase without triggering contract breaks. They basically said "yeah, that's near enough the same price" and then inflation shot up.
So this is all just backpedalling from ofcom really.
The RJ series was even designed for that.
In fact, as far as I know, any RJ plug will fit into any higher numbered RJ socket. RJ10 into RJ11. RJ11 into RJ12. etc.
And that's why pair 1 is on pins 4+5 (the middle pins)
"Where it wasn't a perfect fit" would've been more accurate.
When I've had to use similar two-tether systems, the colouring has never mattered. Because each tether is either attached or in your hand in the process of being moved. If you only have one anchor point, both tethers attach there. When you move, it's one tether at a time - doesn't matter which way around.
It just gets very tedious.
But with these bags, I expected the tether to attach to the crew/suit rather than the spacecraft, so wouldn't need much tether moving.
People with colour deficiencies tend to compensate by noticing other details better. There are lots of stories about military camouflage not working on colourblind people as they see the shapes much more than the colours. So as long as the limitations are understood, it shouldn't prevent you from hiring someone (and actually might be beneficial).
What would it take to configure a drone ship as a launch platform? They already land on them, so run a mission that lands on the drone ship and then refuel and attach a second stage on top while out at sea. In international waters.
Simples.
(I wonder how many people will miss the icon)
I stopped watching F1 the moment the rights holder signed a deal with Sky. I'm not giving Sky any money, so F1 was then not available to me. Haven't missed it since.
I wasn't bothered by all the adverts on the cars, tracks, etc; but me having to actively pay a company that I don't like so that I can watch it was a step too far.