Re: Cheap at..
Well, if you abreviate ... We refer you to the reply given in the case of Arkell v. Pressdram
850 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Aug 2006
It seems to me that MBA's and stray dogs are quite incapable of comprehending the Ten Commandments when they are presented in the reverse order.
Capitalist Bastards, milkshakes for everyone* !
* Stray dogs know a PR Problem when they see one; there will be extras.
The Copyright Symbol is not a key, but rather a keyboard macro, if you know (or care) what a "keyboard macro" is. Why are the Dollar and Euro keys instead of Currency Symbol (for latest data revision) which is not a key ? WTF does the "Windows" key do ?
Reinvented Wheels roll too ? Came right out of nowhere.
Tax Evasion, sorry, Avoidance and "factory slaves" ? Same ethic at work, I'm afraid.
.
My suggestion for Copyright Reform is simple.
Stripping a Copyright Notice is wrong, but who owns the Copyright Glyph ?
The original author, that's who, and the glyph can easily be made into a hyperlink which points to derivative works, "dogfood of value" and the Copyright Notice is preserved. Any Publisher would be happy to endure that tiny stick with the hope of sharing that big fat, tasty carrot.
Of course the same thing goes for Registered or Trademark Symbols.
"A new US government report offers a damning assessment of the strategic direction and management of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), painting the space agency as a rudderless organization whose lack of well-defined goals could threaten US leadership in space sciences."
In the interest of fairness:
http://stratml.hyperbase.com/NASA2011/NASA2011.html
Judge for yourself if the assessment is accurate and complete.
"Santa's Sweatshop"
You are a man after my own heart Joe, BTW, sorry about that perverse sense of humor module which goes along with the heart module apparently it is a package deal.
Moving on, the difference between Santa and Multinationals is that Santa has never looked back at last year's naughty/nice list, much to the relief of the little ones (no names, you know who you are).
It is an epic philosophical battle between TL;DR and "the devil is in the details". But it's not entertainment because we know who wins. No Popcorn necessary. OTOH, every beer consumed, premium or otherwise, is sacred progress in the liberal advancement of the Human Condition. Drink up.
100 % here too.
Who in their right minds would imagine that a post WWII Industry could be created without the foresight to understand that "factory slaves" are indeed slaves and that a shameful immoral outcome was unexpected.
Silicon Valley: Allocation of your attention span, no matter how infuriatingly short, is no substitute for thinking.
If I get that Edmund Burke guy right, then the FTC must be Good Men hard at work.
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing"
Oops. Sorry Burke didn't say that. Sorry.
He did say:
"It cannot at this time be too often repeated; line upon line; precept upon precept; until it comes into the currency of a proverb, To innovate is not to reform"
Even better, I think.
I'm a bit puzzled why this should be "bad news for Google".
It seems to me that the more users they have content with the shallow Google defaults, the better the "wide spread adoption" criterion for accessable deep data looks. Sort of "all of your birdbaths are belong to us and our Silent Majority" metric skewing method. A new Patent is hardly bad news, unless Apple already snagged that one.
Self-absorbed twits not allowed to do as they damn please. Film at 11 all next month.
Wait for it: Eric is preparing his "creep right up to the line" speech, and while you wait, imagine that no Supreme Court anywhere censored Google for anything ... Would that be Net Neutrality ? No it would be a data silo wasteland worthy of your worst nightmare.
Google are self-appointed champions of the worst tyranny cyberspace has to offer.
"Other officials will doubtless be pleased, as well. Many governmental bodies require EPEAT certification for IT purchases, including the US Department of Defense, NASA, Homeland Security, and the governments of Canada, Australia, and New Zealand."
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/13/kitsap_honour/
CC-BY-NC is the (rather sensible, I thought) Australian solution.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-egov-ig/2012Jul/0006.html
It seems to me the sensible part is thinking a move ahead. There is no Judge either in the UK, Australia nor most jurisdictions who will not accept de facto sovereignty of the sovereign. Copyright Holders forget that they are protected by Sovereigns not the Sovereigns themselves. When it comes time for the Royal Navy to drag an Aircraft Carrier into Court to "prove" they have them, then the Courts have lost all legitimacy.
There will be no end to Intellectual Property disputes until the concept of Intellectual Currency arises.
The common wisdom of self-interest leads to cognitive dissonance.
1. Copyrighted documents, pictures, etc. have no existential value - they are all entropy and no enthalpy, with immutable value out of time.
2. Copyrighted documents, pictures, etc. are all enthalpy, no entropy, with immutable duplication rights out of time.
The Web lacks (queue the Fanboi Flame) any democratic principle to resolve this issue "fairly". Certainly, information handling has methods, but, others have put it better ...
===================
John Montagu, Earl of Sandwich: "Egad sir, I do not know whether you will die on the gallows or of the pox." John Wilkes: "That will depend, my Lord, on whether I embrace your principles or your mistress."
===================
"The louder he talked of his honor, the faster we counted our spoons." Ralph Waldo Emerson
===================
My point, simply: Anything you or Google "discover" on the Web is Intellectual Currency, not Intellectual Property. It is the difference between property rights and fishing rights.
Sorry, Andrew, I know how you Brits wish we Americans would just go away. But you've had the Jubilee, and we're having Woodie Guthrie's 100th Birthday Party this Saturday (Bastille Day, for irony fans)
============================
As I went walking I saw a sign there
And on the sign it said "No Trespassing."
But on the other side it didn't say nothing,
That side was made for you and me.
http://www.woodyguthrie.org/Lyrics/This_Land.htm
============================
"I don't see a majority opposed to all possible forms of copyright"
Where do you see any "Internet" majority anywhere ? Like it or not, the Web has many fiercely anti-democratic methods, and the Fanboy-Industrial Complex is no less a threat than the Military-Industrial Complex ever was.
Data trends are in uniform motion (c.f. Newton's First Law). Newton sexed up Cannon Balls by suggesting that you put the Cannon Balls in a Cannon, and you could control the Cannon. He did not presume to tell Governments what they could and could not do with Cannon Balls and Cannons.
Big Data Alchemy is different ... add money and uniform motion turns into Ice Cream. It turns out that if you add money to anything the result is Ice Cream, just ask any Economic Man. But do not ask him to share any of his Ice Cream, nor suggest that it is everybody's Ice Cream. That would be like Newton telling the Government what to do with Cannons (c.f. Title).
Your buddy Eric is at it again, Andrew. He was quoted by Bloomberg (I'll paraphrase)
"Thank you for being useful idiots, now grow up."
His contention was that web searches give you a lot of slanted, worthless information and Google and others were working hard to "reverse rank" the noise, but in the meantime, people needed to understand that this was very hard, don't believe everything you read, etc..
This, said earlier, would have meant wholesale rejection of the Google search method at the outset.
Freedom is only worth guarding for truth's sake.
If you define a lending library by its revenue stream (the occasional fine) and classify other assets (the books, films, etc) as undeveloped resources, then by wilful ignorance alone you allow maintenance of the fiction that IP is either been transferred to some big dog for its own protection or orphan.
This used to be known as the Maverick Fiction in the US. A "Maverick" is an unbranded calf, or at least it used to be before the Republicans went to work on it. Poor Sam Maverick would not even recognize himself.