No. 8: Bottle of wine spilled over keyboard.
Man, that must have been tough:
1. Rinse
2. Dry
3. Profit.
444 publicly visible posts • joined 18 Jun 2008
The reason we should care about this is that WikiPedia is what counts as an education for far too many of our children these days, and far too many teachers for that matter.
No problem as long as WikiPedia actually gets close to its goals, but clearly it is nowhere near at the moment.
I take it from the complete absence of any performance figures that this is currently nothing more than a plastic mock-up and a patent application?
On the other hand, if performance is reasonable, then it is a good marketing trick, since you would need at least two sets of batteries - one to go in the appliance, and one or more to lie around recharging.
At the end of the day, Google is out to make money. so "Google is making exactly the kind of deal with ISPs that it has consistently tried to ban in law and regulation." makes perfect sense: they think that it provides a massive advantage. One that they cannot ignore.
If they tried to say to the regulators that it was too big an advantage for any of their competitors to have, and told their shareholders that they didn't want to take advantage themselves, then they would probably get shafted by both groups.
Ethics say that I should cruise around the motorways at 30mph, so that I produce the least polution possible, but common sense says that getting rear-ended by an artic is going to cancel out those benefits. Does that make me/Google hypocritical ?
I think you missed the point there, Tony, which was that you only provide reviews of what you have been given. Whereas most people want to compare the _whole_ market. I know that would require greater effort on your part, but imagine a comparison of MP3 players, that didn't include an actual iPod, just because Apple wasn't feeling friendly at the time?
So, the IWF have now decided that an image that has been banned from the UK in the past (in its original form as a physical album cover) is now safe for us all to look at. How does it work that out? Has the original banning order been rescinded? Does anyone know the full detail of that banning order - was it an informal thing, or did it emanate from a High Court Judge?
I am not a lawyer, and find it hard to believe the author of this article is either, except in the fact that he seems capable of arguing both sides of a case at once!
I think the first piece that was written about this was about right, in saying that EVERYONE comes out of this badly:
The IWF announced a ban on a page, not an image.
The ISP's implemented the ban poorly - both in the technical measures they used, and by failing to block any of the alternative paths.
Amazon comes out of it badly for continuing to sell the album.
Skorpions come out of it badly for having poor taste.
The Police come out of it badly for not being able to make a reliable decision when called upon.
The law comes out of it badly, overall.
Wikipedia ALWAYS looks stupid - only a lawyer could possibly make an excuse for them.
So, the police themselves "passed it onto a local Police Sergeant." because they believe it is simple enough for all but the lowest ranks to understand, but won't give an actual answer.
We all know from yesterday's activities that the IWF are:
a) Useless
b) Will pass all requests to the Police themselves, (who will say 'Maybe') which the IWF will automatically categorise as a ban.
What a total fail.
This article mentions that the 'production' or 'posession' of an image that _IS_ 'over the line' is already illegal. There is therefore no need to block stuff that is borderline.
Far better just to log it - if you stray too close to the line either in production or viewing then you can expect a visit from the law and a close investigation.
By blocking anything that comes close, you just drive it all underground - this is just a repeat of the whole mp3 fiasco - the studios are finally learning that they cannot defeat file sharing by criminalising it, and the same is true here.
All I can say is: if I applied for a job, and they asked for my CV in a specific format, then that is what I would give them. If I gave them something different, then I would expect it not to be read.
Reminder: this was an IT exam. If it was history or something like that, I would say that the format did not matter, but in this case it was surely part of the requirements.
A better example would be when I sat Technical Drawing a long time ago: if I had submitted a micro-fiche of my work I would have expected to fail, however good the draftsmanship: that may be a valid archival format, but the layout and labelling all fall within the confines of the actual exam.
The teacher should certainly be sacked - AFTER he has tutored all of the children for free.
WW11 is actually a large part of the problem: 'National Socialism' must be bad 'cause that's what Hitler believed in. Communism must be bad, 'cause that's what Stalin and Lenin preached. We all know that Capitalism has just collapsed, so surely it must be time to go back to Monarchal rule?
Or do you think that maybe we should try to understand the detailed advantages and failings of each system? And to you think we should be allowed to talk about them all in public?
Can we please all stop calling these things space craft?
'Weightless' for three minutes kind of gives it away: a vomet comet can manage thirty seconds as it is, and is then able to repeat it again a minute or two later - it doesn't have to land and refuel.
Sure, the pilot of this thing has to wear a space suit, but so did the U2 pilots.
So, if you lose your card, then you also lose the second authentication factor, guaranteed? At least with the external reader that my bank gave me, the two are rarely in the same place - I only do Internet Banking from home, so that's where the reader stays, while the card is usually in my pocket.
How much does that keyboard remind you of the ZX Spectrum? Slap a few weird symbols on them and three different shift modes and you would be right there.
As for the size - the larger the keyboard is, the easier it is to type on, so the fact that the MacBook Air is larger is surely a positive? Particularly since it does so while remaining lighter than this, and cheaper as well?
Like so many, you seem to misunderstand the purpose of Moore's Law. It is not intended to be a predictive device: rather it is intended to keep the development teams synchronised.
Think of it like this: you have one team in Intel that is working on obscure chemistry, one on process engineering, one on circuit design, etc.. Each of these is basically working 'Just In Time'
The chemists need to produce something that the engineers can use, when it becomes the right time. The engineers need to be able to produce a new process when the circuit design is ready. Moore's Law allows them all to predict where they will be in one, three, five years time and allow all the pieces to fit together.
That is also why Intel has been able to stay ahead of its competitors, even though almost everyone else has some advantage, at one time or another.
Adam; you are missing the point: sure there are lots of PHP installations that work, but Google are not satisfied with stuff that works okay.
Think of it like personal transport: PHP is a Dacia Sandero Estate. C++ is more like a 1960's Thunderbird. Guess which one is more economical, which one gets you round a test-track fastest, and which one I would pick if given a free choice?
YEah, it is INTENDED to be built from recycled material, it is INTENDED to be cheap as chips, it is INTENDED to go like shit off a shovel, all they have to do is build it.
(A bit like all they need to do to win F1 is build a fast car - like they have been trying to do for a while now...)
I don't think that Brian Miller put his point across very well, but the point remains: put your hydrogen inside a certified, non-flammable skin and you will be an awful lot safer than the Hindenburg was.
As with all gases, an explosion will only occur if it is well mixed with an oxidiser, or oxygen itself - you don't see much fuss about the tanks full of liquid hydrogen that are common to most space-rockets, do you?
Have you not been reading the news lately?
Take a personal picture of your significant other having some fun and you are in the jail and on the Sex Offenders Register.
Take a photo somewhere near to a child and much the same happens.
Anyway, good luck to the Treasury, this was out and out fraud and deserves to be punished hard.
<- Bill, 'cos he deserves a bit of punishment too, and not the sexy kind either.
Doesn't look like much to me - only one box inside, unlike the usual bulk-pack style we are used to.
In any case, I am more concerned by the use of oil-based plastics to fill up the empty space, instead of paper or corrugated cardboard. Much better for the environment to be using and storing wood-based products than to leave them outside to rot.
Does no-one who read this article know what a core is? Did no-one get the fact that the author was saying that massively-multi-core systems _are_ much better for a server environment than for the desktop?
Go on: someone explain to me how, on a dual-core machine, all of your background threads are going to max out your second core when your first one is trying to keep up with you typing into Word?
I always find it interesting the way that extremists to right are vilified as unacceptable, but persons and groups to the left are perfectly acceptable in this country. The reverse appears to be the case in the US of course, but I have never understood why.
As for the SNP, I don't think that they have much in common with the BNP, but if they do, what does that mean? The SNP are 'allowed' to be the most powerful party in Scotland, but no-one is going to be allowed to be a member?
"The final system will be fully compatible with human rights legislation, he said."
Translation: "We are going to need to slightly alter some existing legislation. Nothing major, just remove a few 'nevers', the odd 'not' and the like."
Why does my grammar checker not like the phrase: 'Fuel-Air Explosive' ? I think it is great fun. Much better than some damp gunpowder...