Of course the trial's not begun...
...BT only said that to help PHORM buff their shareprice in the light of increasing losses, most likely.
270 publicly visible posts • joined 17 Jun 2008
It should be noted that I wasn't talking about the server issues, but the whole concept of online activation.
You CANNOT install and play this game on a computer that does not have an internet connection. "You fail", because you didn't even understand what I had written. Good job sah.
"So, buy it" and reward them for using such draconian and nonsensical DRM?
If everyone did that, what will the company learn? They learn that they can do whatever they like and the public will just bend over, take it, and pay for the honour.
Nope. This gamer's not for turning.
It must be bad, I just paraphrased Thatcher *goes and scrubs his mind with bleach*
...and giving this a miss. The DRM is just too much. Online activation for a single-player game? You can't install and activate on a computer without an internet connection.
Limited activations? Destroy it's resale value why not.
EA aren't exactly at the top of my list of "trusted publishers", so I wouldn't be to suprised if in a couple of years they decide Spore's time is over and pull the plug on the activation servers - what then for the purchasers?
The irony of course is that the game was pirated before it was even officially released. A look over a few "naughty websites" shows scores of torrents supplying cracked copies of Spore.
Me? It's purchase or don't have it at all. I'm not about to go pirating a game, I don't really see the point - it's "only a game" (and from the reviews, not as great as we all thought it might be).
So, EA have lost my purchase. I might reconsider if I see it in a bargain bin for a fiver, but other than that they can take a running jump. I know I'm not the only one that feels this way, either.
They've changed the EULA:
11. Content licence from you
11.1 You retain copyright and any other rights that you already hold in Content that you submit, post or display on or through the Services.
- but by using the term "the Services", they could have just done themselves out of the right to use Youtube content for promo purposes, because "the Services" is a nebulous descriptor.
Oops.
I'm glad you trust them. I don't - they're a commercial entity. Their board/CEO/shareholders change, so do their policies. It also assumes they'll have the financial and technical resources to release said DRM-removing patches.
So given the choice between "it'll definitely still work" (CD/DvD Deployment) and "it has the possibility of breaking if the company folds" (Valve/Steam), which is the logical choice? I can't see any reason why someone would choose to take the gamble.
@Eddie Edwards
Wah, wah, wah. I'm also in field and I agree with it totally. It obviously DOES work because Stardock have built a successful business model following those rules themselves.
What you're saying is you don't want it to work, because it means no more getting away sloppy workmanship, fobbing off the customer and treating them like scum.
If you "work in the business", I suggest with an attitude like your's you won't do for long...
" “For many years we have urged organisations to consider the impact on individuals’ privacy before developing new IT systems. However progress has been disappointing," said Jonathan Bamford, assistant commissioner at the ICO. "
No, of course he doesn't mean the government - they protect our privacy to the end, don't they?
Yeah... mine's the one with the empty ID-card-wallet.
...you know we were hired to service and refit your car? And you know how you sacked us because we screwed up the brakes, the transmission and ripped your leather interior? Yeah well... we still want you to pay us for the labour.
I hope the NHS tell them where to go jump - but I doubt they will. They'll probably "settle" and pay them 10% more than they're asking for...
This act bans peircing porn... some people actually like getting peirced during sex. Some like to watch someone CONSENTUALLY being peirced during sex.
Then there's art itself, which often depicts things that are socially taboo for very legitimate reasons.
I'm gonna take Sarah Bee's invite and flame you, for to be as stupid as you there's no other possibility - you are Jacqui Smith.
Would you like your nipple peirced while we're here?
Fantastic! That means I can very quickly drive anyone I like into debt, simply by phoning them repeatedly from different numbers!
And of course they're not really thinking about prepay customers who only have 2p credit - do they propose putting a prepay into debt? How would that work? Prepay customers don't sign a contract, so it'd be unenforcible, surely?
Paris, coz I'd rather get f***ed by her than by OFCOM.
Yeah, Barclays is "better", eh?
Barclays, the ones who let someone withdraw £500 from my account with nothing but my name, sort code and account number. They had no ID. They didn't even attempt to sign my name - they block-printed it. Yet still, Barclays let them take it out.
I only noticed because I spotted, later that day, that my account was £500 shy and queried it. As soon as they compared the withdrawal slip to my on-record signature, they could see it was different (I sign like a spider covered in ink having a fit on the page).
Though the guy was as thick as them - he tried it again the next day... and promptly got arrested.
And I use Phonebank a lot. The staff NEVER ask for your password anymore. You have a 6-digit PIN and during the callsteer, you have to enter your Account Number, Sort Code and 2 digits from the PIN which have been randomly selected by the computer.
No member of staff handles the password, because there isn't one.
For them to have a less secure system for business customers than they do for the average punter seems very odd to me...
Paris... just coz.
Taking photos of a private space can indeed be invasion of privacy - exactly the same as if I stood in the street and took photos of the inside of your home. The fact that I'm on a public space is besides the point.
A school field these days does have a reasonable expectation of privacy, given the big fences, the hedges and all the other steps to protect our kids from paedogheddon.
@Shaggydoggy - you bet your butt I've read it - I'm a street photographer.
"For example if there was someone outside your childrens school playground snapping away wouldn't you want to know why?"
You've missed the point about being in public entirely. Kids on a school field are not considered to be in a public space, instead, they're on private property - a school. As such, you cannot take their photographs without permission of the landowner.
Understandably? Harrassing police officers?
It's not against the law to piss off a copper. As a photographer I am aghast that The Reg chose to pacify the police commentors by giving that statement any credibility.
They photograph us - if they've nothing to fear, they shouldn't worry about us returning the favour.
McCain: "Keep the shuttle flying!"
NASA: "Give us the money then!"
McCain: "I was a POW! I didn't have money when I was a POW!"
NASA: "...ummm..."
From George Dubya to PO Dubya.
(Note to anyone who may launch into that - I have full respect and admiration for the servicemen and women who lay their lives on the line - what I don't expect is for them to hide behind their experience every time someone asks them a tricky question - eg, Leno: "For a million dollars, how many houses?" - McCain: "I was a POW!")
...make it confusing for the general punter.
I mean really, when it was based on clockspeed you could at least see at a glance which chips were supposed to be faster than what. But it looks like CPUs are going the way of GPUs: Confusing and hard to compare.
For example, comparing the GF5200 with an ATI equivalant... the 9600? Or is that better, or worse, or what? It's very tricky to tell without opening the techspecs, looking at clock & bus speeds and checking the number of pipes it has.
Bleh. No wonder I bought a console...
...I only have a half-meg line, yet Virgin (resold via Tesco) throttle it constantly between 1PM and midnight. Worst between 5 and 11:30, and it's not just non-port-80. Even port 80 gets throttled.
Apparently it's because some of their servers are oversubscribed.
Hurry up BE, be available in my area... I'm getting pissed off waiting 5minutes for my XBOX Live session to sign in.
You've made the mistake of thinking the user would receive the data and then transmit it to the server. The server appears to be the originator of the data, so there's no upload.
It'll still munch bandwith like crazy though, so I doubt ISPs are overjoyed at this news.
And do you spend much time talking to yourself? It's a sign of insanity, you know. No really, it is. I said it is! Stop arguing with me! Stop it, I said, or I'm not going to talk to you anymore... and stop pulling that pouty face, it doesn't wash with me, young man!
...if you don't have the phat bandwidth, you'll be waiting a while before you get to watch that episode of Allo Allo.
I wonder what the ISPs think of this device? It must really munch through bandwidth, and it's likely to be uploading during prime-time (coz that's when people often record).
Network congestion, yay! [/sarc]