Don't be Evil
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ...
244 publicly visible posts • joined 14 Jun 2008
My FF gave me that message box early last Saturday morning, prompting me to update to 'u20' then. Think I managed to cut out most of the 'many bits of cruft' (thanks, AC 13:43 GMT - true!) this time, so back to being another lazy sod who'd chuck Java and half a dozen other things if he could be arsed.
Java, too, is made of badgers' paws.
"Gfk defines a "portable media player" as any portable music device that plays music and has a 3.5mm headphone jack."
Given that a digital radio can't work off batteries for more than five sodding minutes, so can't be used portable, this sounds like what we experts call a "self-fulfilling prophecy".
Those of us who read the Reg know very well that change != improvement.
Weak signal performance: AM noisy, FM noisy, DAB shite.
Audio quality: AM comms quality, FM hi-fi quality, DAB shite.
Battery life if you want it portable: AM outstanding, FM very good, DAB non-existent.
Now back to listening to my FM radio, at hi-fi quality, while I still can.
tired old bollix we've heard ever since the 70's "Home taping is killing music" bollix.
There is still music.
There is still also the fact that the people who copy the most are also the people who buy the most. Why don't these fools just shut up, go away and let people get on with enjoying thenselves? Life isn't all about commercial activity, you know, whatever the commercial activity addicts might think.
The icon's for the commercial activity addicts.
'Whether the police need *more* powers'?
Funny, but I remember them being pretty darn good at their job when they had rather *fewer* powers. They, and we, knew what was OK and what not, and we trusted them to keep the peace, which they did. Good grief, you even got to chat with them occasionally without being made to feel like a criminal.
Now, they have thousands of new laws 'flexible' enough to allow them to do largely what they like, and we're forced to comply with that by, well, force, plus a bit of 'Crown vs Hitesh' (nice post). Whether you can really 'trust' somebody pumped up for instant action who's shouting and pointing a Taser at you is moot, and whether what is thereby kept is "peace" more so.
Progress? Not impressed.
You're absolutely right. It's like that ghastly slow motion feeling you get before your car actually hits something, when you can see the disaster inevitably developing but can't do anything about it. Throw in the time factor, such as the way we're all being primed for a "2012" disaster with movies, pop videos featuring armed, uniformed men strutting about, officials now allowed to "enter" your home "to ensure that unauthorised hypnotism is not taking place in the premises" (FFS, is this surrealism thrown in for the entertainment of the intelligent, or just to mock us?) ... armed police and Tasers deployed in the (once) "free" UK ... I tear my rapidly whitening hair out daily at the way people just don't see it. "Oh, no, I feel *so* much safer knowing there's cameras everywhere".
But like you, I'm damn sure they are going to see it before long. And it's not going to be pretty. And I wish to God that I could think otherwise, even though I don't believe in Him.
There's a flesh-crawlingly sharp piece on Global Research at the moment which I could have written myself and thoroughly recommend - "Prognosis 2012" (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=17826). It's all in place. RIP Civilisation, it was nice while it lasted.
They're already preparing for riots. Why else has the kleptocracy has been infesting the entire country with CCTV, databases tracking everything you do and everywhere you go, getting people used to the idea of being "electronically strip-searched" at airports, allowing practically anything in a uniform to enter your home on arbitrary pretexts, or stop and search you ... and ... and ... Let's face it, to them, *we*, the public, are the terrorists, particularly if we try to exercise our "rights" (hah!). By their standards, stealing our photos is practically a friendly greeting.
You're right, we need a whole new system. But there's an awful lot of money and corrupt power says we're not going to get it.
I (and they) know which side of the barricades I'll be on.
because I happen to think that, 'just maybe', these private companies, IF we mandate them to do it at all, should have had talks "to ensure that data retention is appropriate and proportionate" BEFORE they started stashing away millions of pictures per day. An activity which seems to have 'inappropriate and disproportionate' written all over it.
Big Bro icon - appropriate and proportionate for pretty much any story about the UK these days.
Evidence for a 'Medieval Warm Period' in a 1,100 year tree-ring reconstruction of past austral summer temperatures in New Zealand (Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 29, no. 14, pp. 12-1 to 12-4. 15 July 2002) - E. R. Cook, J. G. Palmer, R. D'Arrigo
Evidence for the existence of the medieval warm period in China (Climatic Change, vol. 26, nos. 2-3, March, 1994) - De'Er Zhang
Local to Europe and the eastern US?
It was still an 85 megabuck scam, as no doubt the Court will be reminded. It would have been a bit much to ask that he trousered the entire 85 as well. ("only" 12 million, btw? errr, *one* would do me very nicely ... ) The guy still has all the brass neck of a banker - well, almost all, as he did actually deliver some (sort of) hardware.
Quite agree with your other comments, though, especially the last. Hence the drink. Whom the Gods would destroy make very depressing entertainment for the sober.
I have to agree with everyone who's irritated by sites limiting your password choice. For example, I really like one site's email (etc.) service, but for their max 12 character passwords. That might have been OK when the site was young, but it's in lookup table territory now. I use better than that on my Yahoo email, ffs.
You can strengthen your p/w (if you're not subject to such limitations) just by punctuating your passphrase, either properly or idiosyncratically. Those seaside lovers could try ...
Oh, I DO Like to Be Beside the Seaside!
or perhaps ...
Oh, do I like 2B beside the Seaside, theregister.co.uk? (for the artist who knows his pencils and is posting here.)
And yes, write them down, in a notebook with a lot of totally unrelated guff 'phrases' - you know which ones you've used (we hope). Twice, one in a secret place so you don't lose everything when it gets nicked.
Mine's the one with the ?N0t3b0Ok! full of guff in the pocket.
Greeting!! (smiley, as left)
* Wish you be happy when opening the parcel.
*China is far away; many thanks to allow us more considerable shipping time.
*Do not hesitate to contact us if any question or problem, give us a chance to help you solve any problem! Thanks (another smiley)
* Please value our services 5 stars by Detailed Seller Ratings. Our hard work needs your encouragement.
* Our website (---------) is also ready to be your best choice to retail and wholesale phone, games and accessories. Any other products please contact us for a better price.
Best wishes and have a nice day!
(the last line in a nice ornate font, and the whole thing on a small card.) It's probably more accurate English than some of our own youth could manage, and the meaning has no trouble getting through the eccentricities. Yes, I be happy when opening the parcel - cheered me up no end, and despite the low price the stick works just fine when whopped.
This really shouldn't be necessary, but if the regulator won't regulate then hats off to the RSGB for standing up.
The short wave is the only part of the spectrum which can deliver international communications wirelessly, and when you're trying to receive femtowatts or less of signal you certainly don't want all and sundry splattering interference all over it. If you're not specifically using these frequencies for what they alone can do, kindly don't pollute them.
I shall be putting a few quid into the kitty, even though I can't really afford it.. Ofcom: Fail. As ever.
When I was happily mis-spending my youth, the rule of thumb was, if you can't remember what you've had, you've had enough.
I suppose this is going to make the modern equivalent, if you can't hit the keys of your mobile phone, you've had enough. You mean you /really/ need an app for that?
(And what other icon could I use?)
It's not the rest of the civilised world's fault that sexually obsessed authorities began seeing pornographic images in everything, including our cartoon collections.
_None_ of us should have to suffer from the delusional perceptions of these paedo-perverts, but that's the law now.
Probably most of us actually preferred living in a world where you didn't have to keep your every thought, word and deed under continual inspection lest some Common Purpose droid denounce you for some doctrinal heresy. But when you have laws like this, written and passed by the sort of creatures which run this show, their vile obsessions poison every aspect of your life, as the very existence of this story proves.
Oh, and I agree with you about the committee, and with everybody about the bloody awful logo.
Hillier said: "But another real benefit is that once you have registered no-one can steal your identity" and "the databases will be very secure - think Police National Computer. No-one will be able to download information and it will not be on PCs on people's desks."
She'll have a slot on Radio 4 after the election, that's for sure.
(Thanks, El Reg - didn't even have to edit the quote!)