Re: A bidding war...
There's no indication of this being the case, in fact quite the opposite. If ARM were sold to a rival you can expect a very long list of anti-trust suits. SoftBank wanting to sell makes this a buyer's market.
12182 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Apr 2007
I'm basically in agreement with you but a couple of points:
These machines are very similar to MacBooks, hence the comparable prices. One thing you should note re. the screen is the resolution. I don't know what your 17" has, but these are all very high-res which pushes up the cost. But you are also paying for power/weight: who wants to lump a 17" machine around? These devices weigh around 1.2 kg and will give you a day's use from the battery.
It's less accurate which means both false positives and false negatives: some innocents will be fingered for things they didn't do and some baddies will get away. Note, it's not just training data that's at fault, though that's the main issue, cameras may have to be optimised to make sure images have sufficient contrast.
Like I said, I think this probably is yet another solution in search of a problem but I think that part of the article is wrong. This is about scheduling stuff within a business workflow. Though obviously we don't need to take it seriously until coffee from Starbucks and donuts from Dunkin or Krispy Kreme are included…
While I think the service is pretty meh, I think there's a bit more to it than that: the idea is to provide a tool that unites various APIs so that services can be coordinated and ordering simplified. Ordering for one or two people might be considered straightforward but once you might want something with even less manual engagement and better integration with billing systems, etc.
That said, given that their current partners are Uber and Coca Cola, this isn't really very sophisticated office automation. And WeWork has demonstrated quite ably how little money there is in this sort of thing!
Far longer than you can expect any USB-stick to… though I don't think that's necessarily the main factor here: it's the consistency of the interface rather than the durability of the media that matter.
Of course, they could always follow the lead of the automobile industry and allow the control systems to be hacked from the entertainment system. I mean, what could possibly go wrong?
Probably will in most places it will: current research suggests the threshold is 40 - 60% of the population and even in the wackiest parts of the US (of which there are a lot, and boy are some of them wacky) don't have enough of the anti-vaxers to make a difference and the low mortality rate will do the rest.
Trump's cack-handed handling of Covid-19 might well cost him the election (retirees in Florida spring to mind) but it's not relevant here and your disaster scenario is way overblown. Yes, there will be many more deaths but still in the hundreds of thousands, not millions. Deaths / 100,000 the US is still below a number of European countries, though it is getting "there".
What's worse, is if China are able to become completely technologically and economically independent from the rest of the world
This is highly unlikely, which is why it is so heavily involved in ensuring its energy and commodities supplies around the world. China has different priorities to the West but closing itself off again is currently one of them.
Maybe, but the delay is now manageable: Trump has been trailing this for years and it's not as if China hasn't significantly improved its engineering capacity over the last twenty years or so. The scores of patents associated with mobile communications and other tech stuff testifies to the fact that Chinese universities no longer produce excellent copyists.
SMIC, the Chinese fab of choice, can't produce the Kirin chips, yet. But it's surely only a matter of time before it can, though this may take a couple of years. But Huawei isn't making the handsets with the kind of margins that Apple has, so it can afford to sit this out for a couple of years, or maybe only months. In the meantime it will continue to make money with mobile network deployments around the world.
But the trade spat is simply encouraging China to become less dependent upon US-controlled technology, surely not a good thing for the US in the future.
Why not wait until the code becomes available before you judge it? Google is actively involved in several open source projects and has a pretty good record for the quality of the code it contributes. If anything, critcism is levelled at it for keeping code to itself.
Really? That is odd. When I watch it, I find that the most jarring parts are the ones involving Manuel – not least in having an Austrian refugee play a clichéd Spaniard. I think most of the violence could be removed without affecting the show and perhaps fewer jokes solely based on the word "que". The best comedy is derived from Fawlty's misplaced arrogance and his resulting insecurity; holding a mirror up to our own most embarassing frailties.
But the Major was a stereotype of the time, being somewhat cruelly mocked. And let's face it people like Rees-Mogg seem to be doing a good job at making sure it doesn't disappear!
Because they're aren't any. US media is divided enough that it doesn't need any help. Not that the spooks are any good at that sort of thing, but they're normally too busy trying to manufacture terrorist threats: see the background to the film The Day Shall Come for more information.
That was just a continuation of the outsourcing of manufacturing to Asia: Japan, Taiwan, Korea, etc.
For some products manual labour in China has become too expensive so it's now either replacing people with robots or moving production to cheaper places like Laos and Cambodia. Or labour camps in Xinjiang or North Korea, difficult to get cheaper than those, largely because the real costs is borne by the state.Good
Economics since Adam Smith has a reasonable history that trade, specialiation and investment tend to offset each other over time. The bigger problem tends to be failing to continue to invest in skills leaving you with less to trade in the future. Hence, Germany and Japan have a much better trading relationship with China than the US does because they still produce capital goods that it wants. But America does well by exporting education and importing investment. This is largely down to the dominance of the US dollar, so you need US assets in order to trade interntionally, but the capital markets are also more liquid and reliable than China's own. Though that my change if exchange in Shanghai becomes less of a casino and they don't fuck up Hong Kong any more.
Russia needs the rest of the world for investment and trade (including food), China doesn't China's priorities have always been with the Middle Kingdom, which is why it has such sophisticated social and electronic controls within the country. By and large it doesn't care about international public opinion except when it reflects back to China: invite the Dalai Lama officially and you can expect a response designed to stoke Han nationalism in China. When it wants favourable legislation, it just gets the cheque book out, which Russia can't do to same scale: compare energy deals in Eastern Europe with the "belt and road" initiative.
It's one of the reasons why so many scientists are switching to Python's Jupyter and Pandas, with Excel relegated to the format for reports.
Excel's import of text files has always been miserable, though this isn't helped by the deficiencies of the CSV format. But it really would be useful to be able to disable type inference as a preference and not fiddle with it, file by file.
If you look at the history of the development of web standards, this is the way it's always worked because otherwise you get no movement. This is why WHATWG was founded in the first place – largely because Microsoft was blocking any changes – and how most things like http/2 have been introduced.
The company has not said why it plans to build a data centre rather than just rent racks galore in a co-lo facility or sign a deal like its existing $800m multi-year arrangement with Google Cloud.
Well, seeing as Safe Harbor and Privacy Shield have been found insufficient by EU courts, why would you risk user's personal data on a system which Uncle Sam thinks it can rifle through at any time? And, if the need is big enough, then it is far cheaper to run your own data centre than rent from Google, Microsoft or AWS.
Even worse, IMO, was the failure to fix bugs in older OS, simply shrugging shoulders and pointing to the new "free" which fixed it by adding new bugs. I seem to remember a crippling Bluetooth bug in Lion that only Mountain Lion "fixed". Hardware interrupts (like Time Machine waking up) have been a plague since the switch to x86_64.
Plus ça change…
But also disappointing because Apple has promised that it will soon offer its own Arm-based silicon across the Mac range
The announcement was "on Apple silicon before the end of the year". I've always interpreted this to mean an announcement of some devices in November or so for delivery in December. Given what's been released this year, something low end might be expected. Many people will be holding off investing in new hardware until it's clear what the strategy will be.
I just sync (via Dropbox) what I need. I have around 30-40 GB of stuff but it doesnt need synching constantly and then I don't need an internet connection to listen. It's mostly paid for which means the musicians get paid more (not that I really care). 150 GB should be easy enough with an SD card, though I'd cut out the middle man and plug the phone into the computer.
5G isn't really raising eyebrows outside Asia where it's been available for longer. Presumably these are selling in Korea and elsewhere. It would also suggest that many of the problems with the first implementation have indeed been resolved.
Do I want one? No, because I couldn't use it as a navigation device on my bike. But scale it up a bit and I'd be more interested. Of course, due to higher costs and lower yields that's not going to be happening soon but some day all "convertibles" might be made this way.
It would have to be either a company with fabbing capacity or the money to pay for it – Samsung maybe. Because the bottleneck isn't chip design but the ability to make the chips. Might have been possible for Softbank to bankroll a couple of fabs before the "Vision Fund" bubble burst.
Otherwise most eyes will be on SMIC, Samsung and the other couple of companies that might want to get involved. And feedback on Apple's own notebbook chips, because if these and the emulation work well there could well be a stampede from x86 to ARM.
No, this is just the chipset for the next gen of Chinese phones. Mediatek chips are normally pretty good but the software – essential for SoCs – is another matter.
If China really wants to make it in the chip world, the software quality, reliability and availability is going to have to improve.
We get it: you don't like Google. And there are plenty of reasons not to.
This doesn't mean it isn't an excellent company and can't develop good software. Android really is an excellent smartphone OS and has been leading feature innovation over IOS for about the last five years.
Interesting. Probably explains the relative popularity in the US. In Europe, phone and contract have been incomingly increasingly separated and the kind of exclusive bundles that are common in the US are not legal here. Helps explain why ARPU in Europe is about 1/3 that of the US.