Re: I seriously don't understand
Wellllll, forced to produce or forced to shut down and try to sell their fancy new data centers to other failing LLM hucksters.
246 publicly visible posts • joined 29 May 2008
One of the things that will be lost to future generations due to pernicious influence of AI will be the experience of working all day on a document.
Not losing it, not dealing with saving it, just the idea that it could take more than a couple hours to crank out a written piece. The so-called grit it takes to investigate a topic, organize and assemble thoughts and edit the results is going to seem completely foreign to kids who think that slapping together a prompt is the same as all those things at once. I fear for our future.
"Dude, I'm 60. I got work, personal, and a junk account and that's about it. I got a moribund FB account to see what my kids were doing 15 years ago, IG to see my daughter's college sports and that's it."
You really shouldn't need to tell them much. Give them the basics and they'll find a very middle-aged absence of anything good. If they really care they'll find the rest just based on where your junk account has been used. Honestly if they can't find more than you can remember with AI combing thru their amassed data I'll eat my hat.
> Infantino[FIFA] Prize for Chemistry goes to Donald J Trump for his secret fake tan formula
Just want to point out that there's *nothing* secret about that fake tan. Wow, just horrible. Seriously, can no one speak to this man about his appearance? Fat, naked, orange emperor is sad and needs someone to step in to give him a little dignity in his dotage.
Terrorism is as terrorism does, so tipping a pint to the green in the name of Famine emigrees really doesn't feel much like driving a plane into a building. Funny what proximity can do. Hopefully proximity to an outright police state will get some Americans off their butts and take some of this seriously.
Let's be fair, this wasn't some simple cloud dump.
"The incident refers to Red Hat's self-managed instance of GitLab Community Edition... Customers who deploy free, self-managed instances on their own infrastructure are responsible for securing their instances, including applying security patches, configuring access controls, and maintenance."
So it's merely a case of some small time operator[1] using Community Edition for unimportant work[2] not getting their security right[3]. Nothing to see here.[4]
[1] Red Hat is not a small time operator.
[2] This was not unimportant work.
[3] This should have been a pretty highly secured target.
[4] This was a major failure. How long were they holding customers' active keys and config info after tickets were closed? Friggin morons.
So work with me here, we want to keep the chip production out of the hands of the Chinese so as a bargaining chip we're going to withdraw our military support for Taiwan?
Also, we're going to require this immediately? We expect a fab to be ordered from Amazon and set up by November, or they should just stop selling so many chips in America? How do they avoid this tax? What's the behavior being sought here? (See also: Coffee, Brazil)
There are tons of domains where an AI could bang out a 1.0 draft that would save everyone a lot of typing. You want to create a project from company standard templates and set up repositories and service accounts and bl ah blah blah then AI can make for a quick and dirty automation tool. If you need a standard contract pre-filled with your company and client data set up as a starting point then this can be great. First line customer support can be covered easily.
But if you want a final product or important tasks completed then it's going to continue to require an adult to watch the output and accept ownership of it before sending it out. AI can be a fine intern that saves you money and handles lots of junk tasks, but like interns you can't trust them to do much right and you never let them do important stuff without a ton of supervision. And management has to hold more senior people responsible for any damage caused by the interns they're supposed to be guiding.
It might be a "you're holding it wrong" case of over-marketing, but anyone who does get hurt by this has abdicated their responsibility as a professional.
OpenAI has enough cash on hand to carry ORA thru the first couple years of this. Not to pay for the data centers of course (ha ha, are you kidding?) but to cover that $6bn gap until enough capacity is built and they can continue working regardless of what happens to Larry. If he blows up they can move to whoever else is afloat that has over-built and wants their business. Sam Altman is a skeezy monorail salesman here to pit Shelbyville against Springfield.
Eh, a bit of strawman here.
Your point is that as a representative sample of 1 you stridently object to the opinions of those who claim that WFH can't ever work. Fine, but those people are fictitious. There are corresponding samples out there that claim that the office is more effective than home for them and who strenuously object to the opinions of those who claim that WFH can work at all. Equally bogus.
The vast majority of people waste some time every day, do some work, and draw a check. It's far easier to waste that time at home in your pajamas, wandering to the kitchen every hour, but I've resisted being 100% efficient for 40 years and I was dodging my boss for decades before WFH became an option. Folks are going to work to their level of integrity, interest, energy, and oversight IN THAT ORDER. If you want to work you'll do it anywhere, same as slacking.
The largest lesson that covid-induced WFH taught was how much waste there was in the old office model. You know most people are doing laundry, making dinner and walking the dog during their usual WFH days, but productivity don't really change. So what were these people doing in the office before 2020? Oversight was illusory then just as its need is now.
Baking may be mature, but LICENSING for baking is a growing opportunity! Maximizing your support investment pays off in a closer relationship with your vendor and a tighter coupling of enterprises. Our success is your success! Partnerships forged in trying times are the best, most lasting ones and we should do whatever we can to make the most of them.
(/s if that's somehow necessary)
Agree, although there's no multi-cloud architecture to save you when google's own IAM fails and you can't log in to use one of their services.
BTW, our Google rep owned this one very early on, well before anyone online had an explanation. Some sort of caching code change went in and sent everything into an immediate tailspin. They rolled it back promptly, but it took a long time to get that propagated. To be worse, we're in us-central so our recovery took a longer time. They told us to change to us-west or wait it out, which was unwelcome. Like Cloudflare, I think a lot of companies might have learned a lot about the realities of their architectures this week. There should be some good lessons drawn from this in the coming weeks.
Two things can be true at once, particularly when they're both bad. The President should be accepting gifts ON BEHALF OF THE NATION, not as signs of personal fealty. Similarly, Boeing is sick and not making any effort to even appear well. That whole episode is illuminating rot in so many places and ways that it should sadden every American.
I agree with all that, even as an American. In fact, it's more true when seen from our perspective. Putting all the technology, artistic, or commercial reins in one set of hands is incredibly dangerous when a group as irresponsible as the current R party might gain control. Other industries provide healthy alternatives to American dominance (eg automotive, pharma, energy, mining, banking, etc) and those are not being toyed with politically as much as those where a handful of individuals represent the entire industry and can be called on the carpet for fealty (and donations.) And competition begets a little fear, which gets the adrenaline going and makes better products. When I have performance complaints I want to see some thought, not a reflexive "Buy more cores."
Agree, and that last paragraph is important. Tesla is not in trouble because Elon went off to play Mogol. The car company is suffering because it not doing a good job of the very basic tasks a car company has to master. They are not refreshing the designs. They are not meeting their quality goals. They are not coming down to the price points that the market is starting to demand. Still no FSD after years of promises, but plenty of driver deaths. The parts market is a mess, and so on.
He can alter the priorities and rush some things through to completion in a year or three, such as a model refresh or better parts supply. But systemic stuff could be harder, and their lead in many global markets may have been thrown away for good by stupid political games and the advances the Chinese are making.
Over the weekend Pam Bondi did come out and say that as much as they want Trump to hang around, she's convinced "he'll be done at the end of this term" and the constitutional issues would present "a heavy lift" which is a generous assessment of the Constitution. I think he's just so old and losing ground every day and there's no way he could press his case without undercutting his own cause by just sounding like late model Joe Biden/Ronald Reagan.
Not privatize, but avoid federally mandated retention policies. He got burned by recordings of earlier calls that resulted in impeachments and trials so he's going off to a platform that deletes conversations after a week. This is more governing as an autocrat and avoiding responsibility and accountability that democratically elected administrations have always had to face.