Re: "Rejected Advice?"
"Oh I'm sorry, the OS won't let me reduce the complexity requirements for at least 6 months"
6967 publicly visible posts • joined 19 May 2008
Whilst they have had engines out they have also demonstrated that engine out isn't actually a critical issue, at least on ascent.
One advantage of having 33 engines is that losing one of them is only a 3% loss of thrust.
Why on earth would they be focussed on testing another payload deployment mechanism when they have so many other things to test first. A larger fairing door isn't going to be the biggest challenge on their process, the first generation of it will likely mass more than later generations, but it's barely rocket science.
And given the costs... it might even be worth adding a Hall effect orbital manoeuvring stage so you can choose a "close enough" orbit.
Close enough still has to be pretty close, orbital plane changes are much more expensive than people expect, but altitude and phase can be modified relatively cheaply.
One large salt boulder acquired...
Given the production rate though, I wouldn't be surprised if the *marginal* cost of each engine veers substantially below that relatively soon.
There's a huge sunk cost in both R&D and tooling, hence looking at the marginal cost.
There are a few ways to get some g on the way, but absolutely having some extended time on the moon would be a good simulation... just sit in a high earth orbit for 9 months before landing, both ways.
I would fully expect the first set of trips to be one way, and unmanned. Those trips will establish the fuel depot (not just manufacture, but an actual depot in case the manned flight needs to leave in a hurry).
Starship isn't taking 100 people any time soon - this page reckons on maybe 1000 kg of supplies for a 6 month stay on the ISS.
Assume a 9 month (Hohmann) trip there, and back, and a 15 month stay waiting for the transfer window back - just shy of three years.
That's about 6 tons of supplies per astronaut... Which is going to take a few starships to get more than a small visiting party across... Fortunately most of that can be sent in advance along with the fuel depot setup.
There won't be anything fresh in there though :(
Sorry, are you really doubting that Farage is a serial liar?
I don't know what to tell you... but I don't think I've heard him being honest... ever. At least not deliberately.
Let's start a few years ago:
- 52/48 would be unfinished business: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-36306681
- Declared that the EU is unelected
- Declared that the majority of our laws are "made by the EU"
- Declared that the EU "costs" the UK £55m/day (even if you ignored any benefits the number would be half that)
- Deliberately conflates immigrants and asylum seekers
Repeatedly claims to have "intelligence" (at most he could have rumours, intelligence isn't shared to any MP) that criminal acts carried out by his supporters were the result of Iranian small boat migrants.
- Claimed police were transporting thugs to riots, when they were taking them away.
Many of his flagship policies are also illegal or otherwise impossible (no we can't "just take asylum seekers back to France")
And then there's a $5m bung... let's see it was undeclared because:
- He lied about receiving it
- It was a personal gift
- It was payment for Brexit
- It was provision for security arrangements
Or maybe it was it for standing as an MP? Since he'd said that he'd lose £1m/year and a parliamentary session is 5 years it's a mighty fine coincidence that he gets exactly that between making the statement and changing his mind about standing.
Frankly I'd trust a potato more than I would the serial liar who owns Reform UK Ltd (previously trading as various other companies).
But Labour are currently talking about misinformation as a danger, which is the best start I've heard from any of the parties.
Free speech shouldn't be unlimited... The obvious example is always "shouting fire in a crowded theatre" but it's equally dangerous to stoke hatred of asylum seekers etc.
This feels like it's mostly an "in a DC when you control everything" protocol..
There may be times when it fits really well, and AI workloads might match that. It might sit alongside TCP and UDP with certain workloads preferring it... I don't think TCP will disappear.
Similar to the shuttle return path.
This is exactly why I've always been surprised that they dropped the oil platform idea (though it seems it might be back on the cards). Even coming in across Central America and hitting a platform in the Gulf of Mexico has some population overflight.
How many more flights do you think would be needed for that degree of risk to be acceptable (to the relevant authorities in the US and in those countries being overflown, not the "enthusiastic" musk).
Booster return looked pretty good to me, both times, but the consequences of a failure would be pretty serious for the entire programme, so it's probably not the most important step in the current testing programme.
Most of those requirements aren't really unique though, they boil down to mass to LEO and delta V once there.
The actual mission specific stuff doesn't depend on the vehicle used to get it to position (except that it has to fit in the cargo space).
Same as every delivery from <shop> is different, but they're all delivered basically the same way, with the caveat that the delivery has to fit in the van...
It can be profitable, but still require capital investment which isn't available.
So much of the nominal wealth here isn't liquid that there might well be sense in fundraising by selling the hardware and taking a cut of all rides on that hardware.
Sell 50% of production to fund the other 50% - you make some cut on the sold fleet, and more on the direct fleet.
There is - but we're also perfectly capable of resolving that "problem" using flexible demand. The power is locally generated, and if my neighbour has excess solar then I should be encouraged to run the washing machine whilst they export, or indeed heat up my hot water cylinder, or charge the car, or whatever flexible electrical load there is.
"A big part of that issue is everybody thinking they'll shove that solar production on the grid and then, profit. It may be better to find ways to use the energy locally. "
And when it's really a problem, that's what will happen.
Octopus already do this in the UK with things like their intelligent Go tariff. When there is plenty of renewable energy flooding the grid they can turn on in excess of a GW of car charging. At some point they'll realise that there are other controllable devices as well (immersion heaters are the really obvious ones).
In winter they have a storage heater specific tariff that will do the same for storage heaters, giving a boost during the part of the day with the best wind conditions.
In countries where there really is a glut the sale price of export drops, and people shift to using the power locally instead. When my solar was installed the export rate was awful, so I didn't export at all if I could avoid it. Now however I'm encouraged to export, so I do.