The US Govt spends more on health per head than the NHS
Yes, you read that right - the US taxpayer pays more money per head to *NOT* provide universal health care than the UK does for the NHS.
645 publicly visible posts • joined 8 May 2008
"it seems likely the application was repeatedly setting up and tearing down IP connections, using each one for a very small amount of data and thus generating more signalling load than the base stations could manage."
1. There is no such thing as an IP connection
2. The network shouldn't see TCP connection setup and teardown, that's for the endpoints to worry about.
It looks like T-Mobile have a horrible layering problem. It's probably NAT.
NAT is bad.
This is nothing to do with network neutrality, it's to do with network stupidity.
Why do you think it isn't?
Oh, because you don't have a clue.
For your information the surprise is that falling total solar activity may be producing warming because the visible/infra red part of the spectrum may be rising even though total activity is falling. Nobody predicted this, so it's a surprise.
"At least, if you believe Professor Joanna Haigh of Imperial College London."
No. There is no "belief" involved.
You mean "If her findings are correct".
Later you go on to say:
"Then, even James Hansen of NASA himself - the man who more or less invented the idea of carbon-driven warming"
No. It was Arrhenius who discovered it, in 1896.
Finaly "But in fact the article title accurately reflected her comments to Nature"
No it doesn't. "Much of recent global warming actually caused by Sun" could have been written "Half of recent global warming actually caused by Sun". But you didn't write that, did you.
SocGen has been awarded damages.
It's up to SocGen to recover the money.
They can probably get a judgement to seize all his assets, and take that part of his salary above the minimum wage untill he's finished paying it off.
"he should be limited to jobs.. involving manual labor."
Well, since he lives in a free country, such an insane judgement would immediately be struck down.
Almost everyone above JK has left or been sacked, from the President on down.
All but one jumped ship before they were sacked. (The guy who was sacked now has a nice case before the employment tribunal - how could SocGen claim simultaneously that JK's boss should be sacked, but that it was all JK's fault and the bank did nothing wrong?)
Only one of his "superiors" is still there - the head of derived products got a slap on the wrist..
(Source - Today's Libé).
"French and Italian garbage,"
Yes, not like the good old Exocet that you're so fond of.
"we should do this mainly in Britain, using British talents, and British people. And British money."
Ah, there's your problem. "British money". There isn't any. Since Britain makes nothing that anyone else in the world wants where do you think it would come from?
"After significant research, he discovered the was the default, and only configuration."
-i bytes-per-inode
Specify the bytes/inode ratio. mke2fs creates an inode for
every bytes-per-inode bytes of space on the disk. The larger
the bytes-per-inode ratio, the fewer inodes will be created.
This value generally shouldn’t be smaller than the blocksize of
the filesystem, since then too many inodes will be made. Be
warned that is not possible to expand the number of inodes on a
filesystem after it is created, so be careful deciding the cor‐
rect value for this parameter.
"Referring to software-RAID I/O performance of years past, she said: "Historically, it was slower. It just was. And it's not anymore. And in fact in a lot of cases it's a higher-performing solution.""
Software raid has ALWAYS been faster than hardware raid, unless the hardware RAID is caching to (hopefully battery backed) RAM.
"I have not seen the figures.. How many tonnes of CO2 did that last Icelandic volcano spew?..."
Not much.
http://www.redorbit.com/news/science/1852153/volcano_co2_output_could_be_150300000_tons_daily/
"Experts said on Monday that the volcano in Iceland is emitting 150,000 to 300,000 tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) per day, a figure comparable to emissions released from a small industrial nation."
Google is your friend.
3. Was fossilised organic matter being burnt at the same rate before people started digging it out of the ground to burn?
"Possibly more so (from things lke volcanoes/forest fires etc,"
We know total CO2 output from volcanoes. It is a fraction of the output from burning fossil fuels.
Trees aren't fossils. Burning forests does not increase long term CO2 concentration (where do you think the carbon in the trees came from?).
Why are we still at the point where people who don't have a clue feel like they can add their 0.05EUR before making an effort to find out what the fuck is going on?
I don't want to sound like an obsessive bore (or do I?) but SATA is no bloody use for those of us who want to use SSD's in servers.
SATA may be good enough for the laptop or desktop, but for servers we want SAS, there is no way I'm going to be putting my data on a device that is tied to one server - we need multi-initiator.
"an assertion which will cause some irritation among academics who contend that atmospheric carbon is the main factor in climate change.:"
Why will it cause irritation? One part of the world cooled down. Now, like the global average it's warming up.
Nobody has ever "contend that atmospheric carbon is the main factor in climate change". The contention is that the observed current warming is caused by the observed current increase in C02 and that the CO2 is released by human activity.
It is well known that CO2 can come from other sources. But those other sources don't explain the current increase.
It is well known that other causes can increase global temperature, but they just don't happen to be occurring at the moment.
...what matters is whether you can fight off an attack.
Your nice Inferno based system _might_ be found non-infringing, but by the time you get the judgement you'd probably be dead.
That's why you'd like to have Microsoft (eurgh) or Nokia/Intel (better) behind you, promising to use their patent portfolios and cash as protection.
Bad things the Frogs have done:
Exploding nuclear weapons during an international test ban treaty
But since they hadn't signed up to the treaty...
...and they were only exploding the bombs to check there bomb simulation code
...so that they no longer need to explode bombs
...so they've now signed up to the treaty.