Re: Run and hide
Playing devil's advocate here (and hoping I don't get sued by Satanists for taking their God's name in vain - or Christians for blasphemy):
Do we actually need a world where every article, theory, blog etc is open to fierce debate publicly among anonymous individuals that have no idea what they're talking about?
Are there too many back-bedroom experts ready to comment on subjects with knee-jerk reactions based purely on opinion and the opinions of others formed through consuming content delivered to them by algorithm?
Would it lead to a drop in mainstream media reporting that 'last night', 'sources' criticised a scientific thesis that goes against out 'racist/religious/political/ability to sell headlines' [delete as required] beliefs - with [sources] being Twitter users and comments? Is it no different to writing an article about that people were talking about in the pub?
Of course, there is a big difference between Freedom of Speech in discussion or opinions and the Freedom of Speech that Trump and his Musky warriors are advocating - being able to say what you want without consequence. Obviously that's not freedom of speech, it's freedom from consequence. Big difference.
But even so it's nice to take an article at its face value with the need to have social media integrated into it - in my opinion of course.