And again, the problem is not the violence
Anyone else wonder how the measures to be taken are not targeted against violence as such, but depictions of (real or staged) sexual acts involving (real or staged) violence? Snuff films and other depictions of actual violent crimes would still be perfectly legal to possess, as long as there is no sexuality involved.
This smells like puritanism. It's as if they think sexual acts (or depictions thereof) are something especially vile and horrifying, making a criminal offense out of something that would just be disgusting and morally opposable (by their standards) if there was no sexuality involved.
We need another sexual revolution, like in the mid-late sixties. Only we need it now and can not afford to wait till 2060s.
Biting the hand that feeds IT
