My Suspicion
Angry Pigs.
1582 publicly visible posts • joined 12 Apr 2007
<quote>OK, I believe the "protect our intellectual property" bit , but "protect our customers"? Really? In what wonderland?</quote>
Networked gameplay is rarely fair when there are hacked clients about. So, yes, by fighting Mr Hotz, Sony are indeed also protecting the majority of their customers - the non-hacker customers who prefer an online gaming environment where participants compete on their personal playing skills rather than the technical merits of their cheat-clients.
Down-vote all you like, it's still true.
I challenge the EU to identify any non-UK resident who has the ability, knowledge and intelligence to come up with a patentable idea and complete the patent application process who does not also have the ability to do so in perfectly acceptable English.
(I would not risk making the same challenge regarding a UK resident doing the same in any other European language. Including English.)
The USPTO issue their patents in exchange for dosh. Quite a lot of dosh. The more patents they issue, the more dosh they get. They have no liability if one of these patents is struck down. They aren't required to take any part in the defence of these patents in a court of law.
Now, if the USPTO _were_ made liable for bad patents, or had to co-defend the patent in the courts, that'd make them more careful with the issuing of them.
Maybe a compromise would be to require the USPTO to refund the fees for any patent they issued that was subsequently struck down.
Only then might they start doing the job we think they should be doing.
An alternative and much cheaper approach for Google would be to simply relaunch Orkut with a new name. Just pretend it's a new product, and if the Brazilians and Indians say otherwise, tell them to hush and give them some free adword tokens.
Orkut. Sounds like the preliminary cough prior to a vomit. That's reason enough for non-adoption in most of the world.
Just rename it Google Hug or somesuch and Zuckerberg would start sweating. Even more.
Could this perhaps be used on old police radio tape recording to finally finally decide if the shots came from the book repository or the grassy knoll, or both, or elsewhere.
Maybe we could have that Dallas chap from "Bang Goes the Theory" to use it. In Dallas. On Dealey Plaza. Sitting in a 1961 Lincoln Continental convertible.
> Apple has already set the price of an operating system at $0.00
WTF?! can see Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard in the Apple Store listed at $29.00!
Oh, you meant iOS? How is that any more free-as-in-beer than other included-with-mobile-OS's like Android, Symbian or Windows 7 Phone 7 Mobile 7 OS?
Well, it's nice to see that the price of the Kindle has dropped, but I was shocked to see that prices of eBooks at Amazon are now mostly higher than their paperback (and often hardback) equivalents.
Of course, the olde Gutenberg-sourced eBooks are available for free, but is there really any excuse for delivering books electronically at a higher price than the paper versions? Apart from attempting to preserve the dead-tree-based business model?
> Might want to re-read the article. All the suspects were employed so NONE of
> them were claiming anything from the "public purse".
Might want to re-read the article yourself, where you will learn that FOUR (4) of the accused are listed as "unemployed".
Perhaps you might argue that they might nevertheless not be claiming anything from the "public purse" but given their alleged activities with the "private purse" it seems unlikely, or immaterial, doesn't it?
The spam links (and spam emails) are not the problem. It's the people who buy stuff advertised from spam-linked websites that are the problem.
If it's illegal to feed the pigeons in Trafalgar Square (and it is) then it should also be illegal to buy stuff advertised by spam. Find these customers and ban them from the net.
Seriously. Enough with this shit.