OK, another car analogy
As LDS has already used a car analogy on the use of highways and traffic fees - How about another one?
The damage a vehicle does to a road is proportional to the 4th power of its axle weight: A small car, say a 2023 VW Polo, weighs 1.15 tonnes - Axle weight factor = 0.109. A VW Touareg weighs 2.15 tonnes - Axle weight factor = 1.34. So if we do come up with some value to be paid by the original purchaser to maintain road surfaces the Touareg purchaser should pay about 12 times more.
It's more extreme with a lorry: Assume a car axle weight of 1 ton (2 axles) vs a 44 tonne lorry have a maximum axle weight not exceeding 8.5 tonnes (6 axles) the "damage" is 1,650 times more. If you based this on say half of UK annual Vehicle tax rates, the lorry would be £140,000 p.a. Obviously the road transport lobbyists would not accept that, and this "Modest Proposal" ignores any societal good of road haulage...
I suspect that telco costs are more linear, or more likely, come done as traffic increases, so how about the punter and big tech pay? I believe that a punter with the info they give for searches, maps, contacts, etc., can be "worth" about $35-100 US dollars p.a. to Google. Maybe charge say 20% of that? :-)