Anti Google marketing
Seems to me the news was mainly created to stifle the rise of Chrome OS. There is no mention of Jim Hood and the MPAA but the WSJ was the first in with it, them for some reason being an intended conduit in the Hood/MPAA New Corp thing. (sad that it makes us even more cynical about so called news)
And in a way users are happy without updates, especially as they invariably introduce new exploits.
Stodgy and relatively safe is Chrome OS.