S100 related but otherwise off-topic
From the S100 Wikipedia page... I just can't get past this photo; it's... amazing:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Harry_Garland_and_Roger_Melen,_co-founders_of_Cromemco_(1981).jpg
402 publicly visible posts • joined 12 Apr 2008
I've just migrated to Gnome (Ubuntu 18.04) from Unity (16.04) and... I miss the menus! I didn't ever like having them at the top of the screen (never liked that on MacOS or even Amiga!), but I did really like having them replace the window title.
Probably not the ideal place for new users to find and understand how to use them, but it really does save screen space which is particularly good when you have a laptop with ~800px vertically.
I'm also missing Unity lenses and HUD. And I'm irritated by stupid stuff like the lock screen looking like a phone lock screen to the extent of being able to swipe upwards (I press escape but that's not the point). And I really hate various sounds like the bell in the text editor (gedit) that AFAIK can't be disabled without disabling system-sounds altogether. And it's got a bloody sound that it makes when USB storage is inserted and removed. Just like Windows XP did! And an alert for the same events. Just like Windows XP. And that always really annoyed me because I *KNOW* when I've just inserted or removed USB storage devices... I don't need to be told about it.
In fact, Gnome is really bloody annoying. I'm trying to like it. It is at least a bit more configurable than Unity was, but good luck with quickly cobbling a little extension to do something simple because there's next to no documentation for any of it. Plus most of the extensions that do exist, don't work quite right! (Prolly because of lack of docs?! I dunno!).
You've made me rant now. Rant-end! :D
I could be wrong, but I believe Thunderbird 60 now has improved RSS handling... or something. (googles).
Okay, there's mention of Thunderbird and RSS here[1], but absolutely no mention of it in Mozilla's own "What's new in Thunderbird 60"[2] blog post. So not much love from Mozilla. :(
On a separate note, can I no longer include HTML links in el-Reg comments?!!
[1] https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2018/08/thunderbird-60-release-features
[2] https://blog.mozilla.org/thunderbird/2018/08/whats-new-in-thunderbird-60/
Another article explaining the same "Shadow Profile" thing:
https://gizmodo.com/facebook-is-giving-advertisers-access-to-your-shadow-co-1828476051
In case anyone isn't aware (I wasn't), where you might expect FB to allow advertisers to target people by obvious data like location, age, gender and things like "interests", they also allow advertisers to target users by their email address or phone numbers. Which means that advertising can be super-targeted... a clothes shop can target their own customers via FB with advertising in the full knowledge of what they've previously purchased.
And like that isn't bad enough, the information that is used for targeting includes phone numbers that are supposedly only used for two-factor authentication.
Aaand if that isn't bad enough, it can include contact details that they've skimmed from your FB-friends who have allowed FB access to their contacts.
All this stuff is part of a "shadow profile" and they won't tell you about that or let you download it.
This might be obvious to others, but personally, whilst I'd guessed they would build a profile that would place users in broadish categories for interests and perhaps infer a bit more data from that, I didn't know advertisers could target people so specifically. Which is really terrifying when you consider political campaigns.
So about that "routine maintenance".
Oh and:
it had identified a "handful" of accounts that showed "incorrect information", which included the wrong name and address
is never a good sign is it? So can we assume that *everyone* was affected then? I mean, one of the quoted tweets was from an ex-customer of theirs so... technically it's possible they've screwed things up for even more people than their entire customer base. I'm not saying they have, but the "Straight from the PR departments arse" comments are so utterly unconvincing as to make me question why they even bother.
NEC can supply Raspberry Pi equipped displays... honestly, I'm pretty sure a particularly sharp 9 year old child could've probably manage to set something workable up and running.
So another case for disabling "allow_url_fopen"?
And on a related note, it is **utterly ridiculous** that the PHP developers add features that extend the functionality of existing functions without requiring them to be explicitly enabled. Even the default Debian PHP production options are far too liberal for my liking.
/me adjusts my evil sysadmin hat for comfort.
I was going to try to explain a sketch with Paul Whitehouse painting light bulbs black... however I couldn't remember it, but the whole sketch (and indeed this comment) is wildly off-topic anyway.
But it's Friday and it's a funny sketch: https://youtu.be/86uuxCzNOI0
The light-bulb bit is just before the 2 minute mark but you're better watching from the start.
BEER TIME!
Can anyone explain how any organisation, but especially a bank, can so comprehensively cock up a system migration?
Surely they must have tested this? Isn't the system they were moving to already in use by the Spanish parent company? And on their list of contingencies, surely at the very end it said something like "...and lastly, Plan-Z, if it looks like we really can't get the migration working in a reasonable time-frame, we migrate *back* to the Lloyds system"
It's so ridiculously bad it's like they have no IT staff at all. It's like they just asked, I dunno, the cleaning staff it they knew about computers and if they could do it. And they said no. But they asked them to do it anyway.
How? How? How? I really can't wrap my head around that simple question!!
I think something has changed.
I believe previously they were hiding contact details if the domain was registered to an individual but not if registered to a company or organisation. But I registered a bunch of domains prior to them bringing in that rule, and so they didn't know and seemed to decide randomly if a domain was personal or not... and there was never a clear way to fix it either.
So I'm glad GDPR is here to fix that. :D
It probably wouldn't be very difficult to craft some Javascript to poll the usual router IPs, brute force the IP, open the admin interface on the WAN side, and log it somewhere for a hacker to access.
If they then uploaded modified firmware then you'd never be able to fix it either. It could then route (say) common bank domains through a remote proxy to capture password.*
* This bit would be beyond me personally, but I suspect a fake site with a LetsEncrypt cert, would be sufficient to fool the aforementioned 82%. The firmware upload might be hard on recent ISP routers also but maybe just changing the nameservers would be enough to redirect certain traffic.
My point is, I don't think this should be written off a FUD.
When we first heard mention of XPoint, the obvious market was in high-IO environments. But there was also mention of the idea of using this stuff in low-end hardware to replace the typical RAM + Flash.
I suspect the price is still too high for that to make sense right now, but who knows. Is that still a likely thing?
I had problems with the Companies House website earlier this week; specifically, the main site would work, but trying to login to actually do stuff, it seemed to get stuck not being able to resolve "ewf.companieshouse.gov.uk"... but it was *very* intermittent. In the end I had to stuff the IP I did manage to obtain into my hosts file.
The odd thing is, all companieshouse.gov.uk domains (that I've looked at) seem to have a 60 second TTL... which... you know, could've been a thing whilst they were trying to fix/migrate/mitigate some other thing. Maybe? But that was a few days ago (Monday 18th) and today, Thursday 21st, it's still like that.
But maybe they have a good reason, who knows!
Surely building a computer where software can perma-screw it up is the problem?
I mean, we _could_ blame Canonical for not testing it (or possibly using code not ready for release), or Intel for writing that code in the first place, but I can't help thinking that having the ability to re-write firmware *WITHOUT* any method to restore said firmware back to factory default/known-good-state is... well... shit.
I think if anyone should be sued, it should be Lenovo (and any other affected manufacturers), and they in turn may sue Intel because it's probably Intels fault. Some how.
A response is here. To quote the end part...
"
Reporter: There are some people who've seen what you've done and think, "what a complete idiot. You're time wasting for the fire service". What would you say to those people?
Jay Swingler: I don't care! Like. There... what about people who drink and drive? What about people who drink and start fights in the street at night? Is that not wasting police time as well?
In fact I wasn't wasting their time. They saved my life.
"
It's a compelling argument! Although, not wishing to pick nits, but no one ever said he was wasting _police_ time, since they weren't called. But otherwise, a rock solid square lump of an argument.
Honestly, when I heard about that flat-earther launching himself in a rocket to prove the Earth's flatness the other week, I did not think someone would out stupid him so soon.
And re people arguing about various dangerous things other people get up to, such as riding motorcycles fast, etc, they do at least have a "fun" factor to them. Ride bike crazy fast... dangerous... but you can see the fun and excitement.
Stick head in bag in cement in broken microwave. Wait for it to set. Nope... call me old fashioned, but I'm really not seeing how that works for anyone, although I'm possibly more troubled that this clown has a YouTube channel and presumably people watch it? Why? Exactly how dull does your life need to be that looking at that would be worthwhile?
Grumpy grump. Lawn etc etc.
Hang on... so, you're saying that working in IT is cool now? So cool that "sexy" brands actively try to identify with jobs in IT?!!
Seriously, this is a total game-changer. Can I finally apply for a job at Reynholm Industries?
Also, is this the harbinger of an approaching apocalypse?
...only 1 out of the 12 has a blank root password. I have reset the root password on all devices anyway however, I am struggling to see why only 1 of the 12 has this condition? Any thoughts other than someone else reset the password?
Total guess, but perhaps if you've upgraded the OS then you'd have a root password set previously, whereas a fresh install fails because of a bug in the new installer?
At risk of #whataboutism, there was an issue with Ubuntu way way way back, where the installer stored the root password in a temporary file and then failed to delete it after install. Leaving it world-readable. That, from a technical standpoint, was similarly embarrassing!
To be fair, it was fixed quickly. And Canonical's entire annual development budget was probably a pittance compared with Apple. But embarrassing bugs are embarrassing. And for some reason I always remember those ones.
My old MacBook 3,1 will run the CPU (Core2 Duo) at half clock speed if used without it's battery. I don't know why this is, but my suspicion is that the PSU is unable to supply enough juice if the CPU is running full-tilt and presumably relies on the battery to pick up the slack in those instances.
"Chief reckons biz did well despite 'negative impact' of EU regs"
Maybe this was because they basically didn't deliver the expected service: O2 admits to throttling network bandwidth for EU data roamers
...so yeah, that'll help. And also brazenly patting him|her self on the back for it too. Profit, profit, profit... and screw the customers.
Slightly off topic here, but DeX was mentioned so...
The whole idea of using just one phone to fit my entire computing needs just seems a bit pointless given that computers aren't really all that expensive?
Surely the reason high-end mobile phones are expensive is largely down to the R&D costs of squeezing lots of high-performance components into a ridiculously small package and then optimising the software to switch most of it off most of the time in order to save power.
It's clever, and brilliant... but I don't feel any great need to only have one CPU/data-storage device. That only really makes sense if you're trying to sell expensive phones and can try to justify the cost by saying "yeah, but you can also use it as a computer", like some how that makes up for it.
The down-side is I'm going to be even more screwed if I lose/break my phone because now I can't even use my computer!
However, what I *do* want is the SoC from one of these high-end phones, in a box, with high-bandwidth ports available. So imagine a Samsung Pi (for want of a better name); it would have a high-performance SoC, but with a heat sink on it so it can run in Full-Beanz mode for sustained periods. It would have display-port and USB-C for decent bandwidth peripheral connection. It would have at least SATA 3 for SSD connection.
And then I can buy that *AND* a phone!
What's in it for Samsung? Well, if I can run Linux on something like that, then really that can happily be my regular desktop (I don't personally need Windows apps), and so presumably lots of other devs/nerds would think like-wise. And that would likely mean people would actually develop specifically for that platform.
... So pretend I'm from Samsung and I'm taking orders; who's in?
The Web Share stuff seems like a good idea, but I can't help wondering if the likes of Facebook and Twitter will really be happy with *not* having their code embedded on loads of websites and therefore no longer being able to glean meta-data about where their users browse?
Wasn't some company recently accused of tracking users on third-party sites even after they'd logged out?
Also re the WebUSB stuff... it'll be fine! Seriously you guys are worrying about nothing. It won't do anything without confirmation, and it means you can update some kit without needing to install Windows *just* to do that. It may be exploited, but outside of a bug in the implementation, I can't see it being more exploitable than downloading *.exe files.
I appreciate MS isn't quite the same as MS of old, and I do understand this might well be good for both parties and customers alike. But historically, partnering with MS hasn't turned out well for the partner that isn't MS... so I'm wondering what Redhat hope will come out of this?
Or is it Redhat shareholders hoping that eventually Redhat will be bought out?
Or maybe I'm just being cynical?! :D
To give Three some credit, once we’d found someone senior enough she was genuinely interested in the problem, took ownership and got it sorted
The only way I can think you could speak to someone who actually knows stuff is... SHIBBOLEET! Am I right?
Also, is this a problem that could be solved by DNS?
<quote>I remember learning that Gaelic didn't have words for the same colours as English, they had ones for blue-greens and grey-blues that we don't have.</quote>
I seem to recall seeing a programme on TV in the last... year or three... about somewhere foreign* (even more exotic that Scotland), where they also had names for colours that we* would consider mere shades. To their way of thinking, those colours were utterly distinct. The opposite was also true, so (I can't remember the colours in question) there was this funny thing where they'd ask them to spot the difference between one colour and another, and they honestly struggled.
So it's interesting how language affects how individuals perceive the world. It's also probably a reason why I *should* learn at least one other language... I won't though! ;-)
* For context, I'm from England, don't speak anything but English, and anywhere outside the British Isles *is* both foreign, and probably exotic to my mind! :D
@LeahroyNake
I don't believe the printer includes the date, time or location.
Apparently, these days, they do... :-O (as well as serial no.)
slashdot.org (how a few yellow dots burned the intercepts nsa leaker)
I've linked slashdot simply because there's a bunch of links to useful articles from there.
From a management/planning perspective, pulling support without having some sort of migration plan was always going to end in disaster. If I was being kind, I'd say that Mr. Hunt at least got part way there in that he recognised that spending a shit-ton of money on support was a waste and needed to be solved... but simply pulling support? Nope, unquestionably, that was a bad idea.
I'll go along with your opinion of MS however! :D
Really, the bigger problem with all government IT is that there is no long-term plan. They've put themselves in a position where they're using an OS with a single supplier who, essentially, have them over a barrel.
So I'm another one voting for Linux. But not so much because of any technical superiority versus Windows, but more because of the Free as in Freedom aspect... if UK.GOV sourced their own standard Linux (think of what Goobuntu is to Ubuntu), then they can pay any IT support outfit to manage it. Maybe a UK based one for example?
Also... this isn't just the NHS is it? Aren't UK police using lots of WinXP too?
Curiosity's twin Maggie. (https://www.reddit.com/r/space/comments/51m2b4/meet_maggie_the_earthbased_copy_of_the_curiosity/?st=j2bu8dtu&sh=81b405b4)
Should we worry that the " L-A-B T-E-C-H-N-I-C-I-A-N " * is _completely_ naked from the waist down? Because, quite frankly, that sort of behaviour is filthy!!
* (big air-quotes, and pronounced loud and slow for full comedic effect)
...particularly the fact that it is assembled out of publicly available tools leave no forensic evidence...
It's a French car in the picture though - and there can't be many episodes where the team modify a Renault. Maybe they should start with that evidence?
Or have I misunderstood the entire article?*
*It's a Friday - I'm allowed to start early! :D
Ubuntu 16.04 running on a Core i5 with nVidia graphics vs. Raspberry Pi 3 with Raspbian/Pixel: I find the file manager on the Pi (PCmanFM) to be much snappier than Files on the Core i5.
I appreciate that there's less thumbnailing enabled by default on Raspbian, but even so, I struggle to understand how Files manages to be sooooooooooo slow!
As for Ubuntu/Unity, I've stuck with Unity thus far because, it's good enough. I like some Canonical stuff, like all the polish with colours/icons/fonts, but it's always disappointing how many bugs there are... it always feels like Canonical don't dog-food the LTS releases, so they get pushed out but the user has a ton of work to do to make them usable. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Whilst I'm certain I should want greater competition in the mobile-OS world, I'm really struggling to care about MS at all.
Didn't they try to have an alternative Android stack to the Google stuff at one point? Didn't they have a good map application?
Anyway, this whole loading software at retail thing clearly won't scale, so has considerably less chance of working than Windows-phone did... by MS surely know this. So are they trying to provoke Google into doing something that help MS (and others) launch a legal attack?
*Need a popcorn icon for this post!
Genuinely, opened the article but was also naffing around with a music player... so brain not fully engaged... looked at the article and thought my eyes were going a bit funny!
As for bit-mining... yeah, great idea, except - and I think I speak for the majority of readers here - "We're all browsing using modified commodore-64s! So, the mining operation might take... some time"!