Like almost all of Red Dwarf :)
Posts by Richard Wharram
1215 publicly visible posts • joined 7 Apr 2008
Linehan turns IT Crowd off but NOT on again
Robot resolves Rubik's Cube in record time
FSF takes Win 8 Secure Boot fight to OEMs
Smut oglers told to opt in to keep web filth flowing
This Dianamania is a slur on Jobs
Gay-bashing cult plans picket of Steve Jobs funeral
Doesn't work that way.
They don't protest at people they hate. For example, when they protest at soldiers' funerals it isn't because they have anything in particular against the soldier. They claim to believe that God is punishing America for 'allowing gayness' and any funeral can just be seen as part of God's punishment. The logic is always tenuous.
Anyway, that's the purported logic, the real reason of course is to offend people and get publicity.
Ballmer: Uninspiring performance and a small package
Ten... Androids to outshine the iPhone 4S
Accelerating universe expansion discovery snags Nobel Prize
Huawei gets charged with juicy Android handset
Virtual cloud monkeys go bananas writing Shakespeare
Hey Commentards! [This title is optional]
Ultra-cheap HP TouchPads to hit UK at 6pm
Lenovo chiefs chortle over decision to buy IBM's PC biz
Explaining the Chocolate Factory's Patent Panic
As I said...
I still think this deal is less about the patent portfolio than forcing Apple to take on Google's fat lawyer pool instead of it's Android partners who will be more easily bullied by Apple. Google could sell the hardware business on in a couple of years after it's had the fight with Apple it wants.
Apple changed shape of Galaxy Tab in court filing
roffle
Have you even read the other comments ? Apple DID NOT invent tablet computers. They've been around for years. They made them popular sure because technology had advanced enough to make them more practical. So your argument is "the first corporation to popularize something should be granted a legal monopoly."
There is not enough palm for this face.
Has Google wasted $12bn on a dud patent poker-chip?
I would suspect...
That since Apple is suing phone makers using android rather than Google and bullying it's partners Google is trying to make the fight more even by forcing Apple to sue Google itself.
With Google's money and lawyers they might even fight Apple's patents directly and get them invalidated, one by one.
Maybe...
Scottish TV news pumps goatse link
Bug-Byte Manic Miner
Dungeon Siege III
Multinationals out themselves as big Aaas fans
Modern Warfare 3 teaser trailer reveals terror on the tube
Must disagree
I'm well aware of the developer history of the CoD games. BO's problems on the PC were mainly caused by the fact that the PC QA team comprised of two of the cleaning staff and one of the junior manager's offspring on a 'bring your daughter to work' day. The PC version always had problems with Windows 7 on about half of all configs but the sales had been made. There was never any priority given to fixing the rendering pipeline issues. The only issues that got fixed were those in common with the XBox and PS3. I can't believe they couldn't have fixed these problems if Activision were willing to fund it or if Treyarch had had the balls to demand something should be done, but nothing was done. The coding duties passing back to, in part, a team which still calls itself Infinity Ward but without the clout it used to have is not likely to fix the slap-dash approach the franchise has to the PC market.
In short, I paid £40 on Steam to get a game, promised to me at midnight on release day, which unlocked after retail shoppers were already playing the game, and which hasn't been playable (except it's half playable if you build a Windows XP partition for it) in the whole 6 months since release. As it was a Steam purchase I can't even get a refund.
I don't need to repeat then that I won't be purchasing this until it costs £10 and I have hand-written confirmation that it cooks a mean full-English and can bring a man to a knee-shattering-climax from 400 yards.
Euro report slates wireless comms, recommends smoke and mirrors
Five amazing computers for under £100
2011 Ford Focus
Boot space
My Mk 1 ST170 is a little light on boot space but that's partly because of the woofer on the left hand side. It's still not bad though.
The wife's Mk 2 (post 2008 re-style) Titanium has a HUGE boot though. I'm sure it was biggest in class at the time.
The Mk 3 is a little smaller apparently. Should still be decent though but not experienced it myself.
Sanity saver: Fedora 15 answers Ubuntu's Unity
Child protection website insecurity fixed
Official iSteve biography gets 2012 release
Patent application
Apple's lawyers are attempting to patent something called a 'biography' which is a collection of writings detailing the life of an individual, or less frequently, more than one individual, written by a third-party.
Apple is firmly convinced this is something that will catch on and will likely be emulated by Apple's competitors without paying Apple due royalties for the invention and fostering which it spent many thousands of man-years working on, unless it is granted the protection in law it deserves.
HTC Android tablet priced up for Blighty's shoppers
Vatican hails hacking culture, Wikis
Out of shape? Not had sex for years? Watch out
Black Ops is the best selling videogame EVER
Never again !
5 months on a Black Ops is still unplayable on Windows 7 for me. I just can't be bothered booting into XP just for one game that looks very dated anyway. If I hadn't bought through Steam I would have got a refund. Won't repeat the mistake.
And oddly enough the return of dedicated servers actually makes this game even more crappy than MW2. So many servers with crap rules (no jumping ? knife only ?) or with admins who kick anyone who kills them or with stupid map lists (Nuketown only servers abound). On MW2 you could choose whatever playstyle you liked and hardly anyone whinged about it because there was nothing anyone could do about it. In BO people try to get you kicked and whinge at you for practically anything. Back in MW2 all you had to do was get the vote to skip Estate passed and you were sorted.
Will try a different game that actually uses my graphics card in future.
Lady Gaga puts the squeeze on breast milk ice cream
Anti-religious campaigners smack down census Jedis
@Dr. Mouse
A servicable definition of God that would be amenable to all parties is indeed a major problem. Let's try looking at your argument from another angle.
You are suggesting that any conceivable proposition which can't be proved by someone must require faith. There are an infinite number of such propositions which any of us would immediately dismiss as nonsense without being able to actually prove it. To say that all of these require 'faith' is to trivialise the concept of faith to a meaningless truism.
@Steven Knox
"An Atheist believes there is no god."
That statement is ok an a normal piece of English that isn't going to be analysed too deeply but if someone is going to get prissy enough about its meaning to use it in two syllogisms then I'll have to cry foul. It's a 'common-sense' phrase but the meaning taken from it is different to what it says on the surface, like so much of natural language.
Closer to the truth would be something along the lines of:
"An atheist does not believe in God A"
"An atheist does not believe in God B"
"An atheist does not believe in God C"
"An atheist does not believe in God D"
ad infinitum.
To then say that any of those requires 'faith' because they are, by definition, not provable is obviously twisting the meaning of the word 'faith' outside that where it serves a useful purpose in the language.
Write your argument in formal logic and I'll consider it. Otherwise I'll just treat it as sophistry exploiting the multiple meanings that English words and phrases can have in the service of a bullshit argument.
Shuttleworth sees fewer clouds in Ubuntu's future
New 'supercritical' generators to boost nuclear output by 50%
Feeling heat from Macs, Microsoft sells PCs sans crapware
Prepping the great Windows 7 migration
Microsoft rallies IE6 death squads
Health experts flip over McD's burger-flip toy
Miserable ********
It's a toy !
Taking your kids to McDonalds once in a while is not going to make them fat and will provide Mummy and Daddy with a stress-and-effort-free dinner for the family at minimal cost.
Why are interfering busybodies like this allowed to express opinions when they could be more usefully minced up into patties ?