Re: Please
Of course, able to track the animals back through generations, records of what they are fed and any injections are things any commercial farm is obliged to do. You should see the stuff you need to record for PIGS!
16 publicly visible posts • joined 2 Apr 2008
Why would you say they changed their minds?
The first announcement said they will no longer support *DOWNLOADING* old MS Office formats, so does the second.
They only re-worded it to make it more clear it was only downloading/exporting they were talking about. Nothing changed.
I lasted a little under an hour of use before I had to give up, it took longer to install it.
Got stuck on the "pictures" screen, unable to leave. No icons, no menus, no way to navigate back to that odd start screen. Only way out I could find was to hard power down the machine
I found out later that you may be able to press the Windows key, which this (old, but fantastic key feel) keyboard doesn't have
I've read a lot of the links posted here, and followed links from there elsewhere and from what I can tell there has never been any proof.
No scientific journal would publish his paper, so he self published on his blog. The paper itself leaves out a lot of information
In fact the only scientific article I could find was one that questioned his press releases, mostly talking about the fact the machine produces too much copper
No idea if his machine works or not, but if people keep saying "there is proof" I'd like a published paper from Rosi showing it and several other laboratories able to reproduce the results.
I fall in the range of a small business (Entirely Internet reliant) that can't really justify the 2k a month for a corporate account. I'm getting by with a 1tb ADSL2 which is good enough.
In my little industry, I know a half a dozen other companies I do business with that are in the same situation. Dunno if the NBN is any good, or crap, or too expensive, or the devils work... but for us (Small Bus.) it's fantastic!
I thin the above posters, @cartercole and @lou may be reading the word "defense" incorrectly
The person quoted is a general, he doesn't mean "firewalls and making sure your PHP is safe" sort of defense, he is talking about the military meaning of the word
In other words, you fight an enemy offensively or defensively. When fighting defensively you may allow them to come to you, and pound themselves against your walls or trenches and you kill them there
Obviously, in cyberwarfare, allowing hackers to attack your site deliberately to "kill" them as they do so isn't going to do anything.... You "must" fight offensively, seek their strong holds out and kill them where they live.
Yeah, chatting to screaming, naked druggie always works...
It's a wonder that all those people being stalked by ex's for 20 years, who stand outside their house at 4 in the morning screaming abuse (then begging to be forgiven, then screaming abuse) don't try this easy, fail proof method method
(Whats the end sarcasm tag again?)
I don't understand this article.
It's not April the first, and there is nothing in the article body (or video) that directly implies it is a joke, but rather both take the idea seriously.
The video contents however, are technically impossibly and patently ridiculous.
Is this a joke video the author didn't get? Or is the article itself so deep, filled with extended irony, that it went over my head completly? (Probably the latter, I don't mind that, I'd just like to know)