Re: Nope.
I would tend to agree with you. If my flight is only a few hours (ie less than 4), a thin body doesn't bother me, but if I'm supposed to be stuck inside a tube for longer than four hours, I'd welcome the illusion of space to move in.
19061 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
I have had my fill of the cattle class.
If I ever even think of taking a plane again, I'm paying a first-class ticket.
The price alone will be an incentive to stay put, but if I really, really want to get somewhere by plane, I will no longer be stuck in a seat next to a whale.
I'm 56 years old now. I'm done with putting up with constraints.
I want my comforts, and I'm ready to pay for them (just not rich enough to charter a private jet).
Even if you can argue that maybe this young lady could have been a bit too sensitive, I think it is high time we put a stop to this widespread Internet habit of insulting people simply because you're not standing in front of them.
People on the Internet say things they would never dare saying face-to-face. Maybe that's something for the psychiatrists, I don't know, but it is time to clamp down on that.
How long before people finally understand that there is no Nigerian prince, no free lunch and nobody begging to give you money ?
Wake up, people. Money is earned by hard work (unless you are a member of the 1%, in which case your money is earned just by you breathing).
Um, except you have.
In the Age of the Internet, it really is a bad idea to blatantly spout nonsense that can be proven wrong with a simple search.
Apparently, some companies really think that people are just going to trust whatever they say blindly.
Doesn't work like that, guys. It really doesn't.
Not even if your name is Apple.
With all the precedents that have been set, and continue to be, you still hire Chinese nationals in national-security-sensitive or highly-demanding engineering posts ?
Shouldn't there be a bit more background research before hiring when the individual comes from China ?
You really bring it on yourselves sometimes.
You didn't get it : the Metaverse is going to be all holograms. All that hardware stuff is completely ignored since El Zuck specifically said that "Your TV, your perfect work setup with multiple monitors, your board games and more – instead of physical things assembled in factories, they'll be holograms designed by creators around the world".
So, see ? You won't need any of that, they'll be holograms.
Oh, wait . . .
Indeed.
Apple has that much money sitting in the bank. So does Google. If they want something done, they have the means to get it done.
The State should keep its money for things that its citizens don't have the means to pay for, and not give that money away to insanely rich companies that have more money than a small country.
What's the unit smaller than a nanometer ?
Are we going to start counting in atoms ?
Because, correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought I had already read that we are approaching the physical limits of the Universe. Just as you can't do colder than absolute zero, you can't go smaller than the size of an atom.
So, are we there yet ?
"no longer see it as a mere cloud data warehouse and to view it more as a platform for sharing data and data-analytics applications"
What is the function of a "mere" cloud data wharehouse ? To have data accessible in The CloudTM. So how can a cloud data wharehouse not share data and whatever else is running there ?
This is nothing but a marketing announcement, and nobody but salespeople and amoebas with one brain cell are going to buy into it.
First of all, what we need is companies that pay their taxes.
And my whole point is that we need to rethink this situation.
Just saying that we need Apple to make ever-more-expensive shiny tat that ends up landfills is not a solution.
It might be time for us, as a society, to start re-thinking this endless yearly product cycle.
We do not need a new Iphone model every year. A phone should be able to last five years without trouble, so make your new model cycle over five years and everyone will be happy (well, except for those who absolutely have to spend a thousand bucks a year to prove that they are better than everyone else).
In truth, I have to admit that that does not seem unreasonable.
At the condition that the trade is made internationally. Currently, I make purchases on Amazon.fr. That, to me, means that whatever international taxation there is has already taken place. If that's not the case, they should clean that part up, but I fail to see why I should be contacted for international taxes when I'm buying stuff stored in France from a French web site.
Looks like another storm in a teacup from where I'm sitting.
Uh huh.
As usual, you measure noon by the shadow at your door.
Unfortunately, this is tech. Tech doesn't have a noon. With the Internet, there is no noon. You conform to technical requirements, or you can get lost.
This is starting to feel like those US idiots who tried to legislate that PI was 3.14. You can't legislate mathematics, you morons, and you can't legislate the requirements of server logging. You need to start by understanding the problem and all the dependancies - something a minister and his cabinet is going to have a heck of time getting into.
This is absolutely unacceptable - for the shareholders.
This is going to set a very dangerous precedent. Who knows what the consequences might be ? We might even stop subsidizing entirely, and then where would our poor farmers be ? They might actually have to start selling their produce at cost+margin, and then the entire supermarket industry would have to, wait, raise their prices ?
Madness. This is the path of madness and the ultimate downfall of civilization. It needs to stop now.
AI is nothing but statistics. I did the Google course on that - well, the first six modules that is, after that it got way too mathematical for me.
This is a machine. It's based on PC hardware and can be flipped off with a switch.
There is no emergence here. It is not intelligent. It has no feelings and doesn't even know what a feeling is.
Let's keep your comment for when we have finally fully understood how the human brain works and have managed to replicate that in silicon.
That day, we'll turn it on, ask it a question and it will answer : "Hey, do you mind ? I'm watching YouTube !"
THAT will be the day we have finally invented AI.
I told her not to, but she wanted to because that way, she said, she could post vacation pics for her close friends.
Fine, I thought, after the vacation, we'll shut it down.
Well, not exactly, obviously. It took two years, but she finally told me one day that she was shutting down the account because she had noticed she was wasting much too much time on it and the other posters (ie morons) were constantly making her angry.
She shut it down because she was tired of being angry.
Hallelujah.
No surprise there, they're the ones that created the market.
Borkzilla, late to the party as usual, tried to muscle its way in but didn't have the balls to follow through. It rarely does when it's not the one dictating the rules.
Nokia was there for long time, but didn't manage to get to grips with smartphones and failed.
Competition is possible, but will not come from government dictate. Given the cost of entry into the market, there's every chance that the future competitor on the market will be from China, because that is where it is growing right now, safe from meddling by either of our two incumbents.
Maybe India could grow one too, who knows ?
The analog sound is digitized ?
Maybe it is today, but back in the day (ie when I was young), the process was to make a master record, then use it to imprint the production line to make copies.
There was nothing digital in that process. They didn't have the technology for that yet.
I think.
"The fire was subdued around 1000 after the electrical network was cut off and a pump boat arrived"
Around 1000 what ? Seconds ? Minutes ? Or is it supposed to be 10:00 A.M. ?
Military timing is all good, but a : every now and then wouldn't hurt.
Okay, is it time to stop the bullshit about The CloudTM being easy to use ?
When it is working (which is not all the time) you have to track your usage (otherwise the bill at the end of the month is a punch in the gut), you have to ensure secure access, and now you also have to ensure against attacks you don't even know about.
I have a revolutionary idea : how about housing that server in your own server room ?