The Borg is feeding again
So this is the latest spending spree from Borkzilla.
Oh well, I'm confident that this will not change the "quality" of Windows in any way, but I'm welcome to be (positively) surprised.
18988 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
"no longer see it as a mere cloud data warehouse and to view it more as a platform for sharing data and data-analytics applications"
What is the function of a "mere" cloud data wharehouse ? To have data accessible in The CloudTM. So how can a cloud data wharehouse not share data and whatever else is running there ?
This is nothing but a marketing announcement, and nobody but salespeople and amoebas with one brain cell are going to buy into it.
First of all, what we need is companies that pay their taxes.
And my whole point is that we need to rethink this situation.
Just saying that we need Apple to make ever-more-expensive shiny tat that ends up landfills is not a solution.
It might be time for us, as a society, to start re-thinking this endless yearly product cycle.
We do not need a new Iphone model every year. A phone should be able to last five years without trouble, so make your new model cycle over five years and everyone will be happy (well, except for those who absolutely have to spend a thousand bucks a year to prove that they are better than everyone else).
In truth, I have to admit that that does not seem unreasonable.
At the condition that the trade is made internationally. Currently, I make purchases on Amazon.fr. That, to me, means that whatever international taxation there is has already taken place. If that's not the case, they should clean that part up, but I fail to see why I should be contacted for international taxes when I'm buying stuff stored in France from a French web site.
Looks like another storm in a teacup from where I'm sitting.
Uh huh.
As usual, you measure noon by the shadow at your door.
Unfortunately, this is tech. Tech doesn't have a noon. With the Internet, there is no noon. You conform to technical requirements, or you can get lost.
This is starting to feel like those US idiots who tried to legislate that PI was 3.14. You can't legislate mathematics, you morons, and you can't legislate the requirements of server logging. You need to start by understanding the problem and all the dependancies - something a minister and his cabinet is going to have a heck of time getting into.
This is absolutely unacceptable - for the shareholders.
This is going to set a very dangerous precedent. Who knows what the consequences might be ? We might even stop subsidizing entirely, and then where would our poor farmers be ? They might actually have to start selling their produce at cost+margin, and then the entire supermarket industry would have to, wait, raise their prices ?
Madness. This is the path of madness and the ultimate downfall of civilization. It needs to stop now.
AI is nothing but statistics. I did the Google course on that - well, the first six modules that is, after that it got way too mathematical for me.
This is a machine. It's based on PC hardware and can be flipped off with a switch.
There is no emergence here. It is not intelligent. It has no feelings and doesn't even know what a feeling is.
Let's keep your comment for when we have finally fully understood how the human brain works and have managed to replicate that in silicon.
That day, we'll turn it on, ask it a question and it will answer : "Hey, do you mind ? I'm watching YouTube !"
THAT will be the day we have finally invented AI.
I told her not to, but she wanted to because that way, she said, she could post vacation pics for her close friends.
Fine, I thought, after the vacation, we'll shut it down.
Well, not exactly, obviously. It took two years, but she finally told me one day that she was shutting down the account because she had noticed she was wasting much too much time on it and the other posters (ie morons) were constantly making her angry.
She shut it down because she was tired of being angry.
Hallelujah.
No surprise there, they're the ones that created the market.
Borkzilla, late to the party as usual, tried to muscle its way in but didn't have the balls to follow through. It rarely does when it's not the one dictating the rules.
Nokia was there for long time, but didn't manage to get to grips with smartphones and failed.
Competition is possible, but will not come from government dictate. Given the cost of entry into the market, there's every chance that the future competitor on the market will be from China, because that is where it is growing right now, safe from meddling by either of our two incumbents.
Maybe India could grow one too, who knows ?
The analog sound is digitized ?
Maybe it is today, but back in the day (ie when I was young), the process was to make a master record, then use it to imprint the production line to make copies.
There was nothing digital in that process. They didn't have the technology for that yet.
I think.
"The fire was subdued around 1000 after the electrical network was cut off and a pump boat arrived"
Around 1000 what ? Seconds ? Minutes ? Or is it supposed to be 10:00 A.M. ?
Military timing is all good, but a : every now and then wouldn't hurt.
Okay, is it time to stop the bullshit about The CloudTM being easy to use ?
When it is working (which is not all the time) you have to track your usage (otherwise the bill at the end of the month is a punch in the gut), you have to ensure secure access, and now you also have to ensure against attacks you don't even know about.
I have a revolutionary idea : how about housing that server in your own server room ?
A screen does not need smarts, all it needs is the ability to render an image, whatever the source.
Stop this "smart" nonsense. Just slap an Ethernet connector on it and allow me to stream whatever I want to watch from wherever I'm getting it.
If all it can do is render an image, it doesn't need updates and won't fall into obsolescence before its components die.
Put the smarts into whatever I connect to it, but leave my screen alone.
The only thing they're doing is relying on user stupidity.
Granted, there's apparently an ocean full of that, but when users will finally understand that you don't open mails from someone you've never heard from, their attack vector will go dry.
I give it another 10,000 years.
Once again, an attack that is based on the user opening an attachment from someone they don't know.
I've been getting a few mails this week with the subject "Re: your order is blocked", containing an attachment.
I haven't ordered anything. If you really think I'm stupid enough to open an attachment from an email I did not request concerning something I did not order, I just wish I had Thor's lightning at my disposal, because I would use it.
Liberally.
Are you out of your mind ?
Email is essential for business. You know, that thing that keeps the economy going.
The economy. That thing that keeps Microsoft on top of OS usage.
If you think business is going to switch to video conferences for confirming invoices, you have lost the plot.
Well duh, obviously they're going to agree - if they don't, they don't get the job. You don't need a PhD to understand that.
The fact that the job comes with unacceptable limitations is another point entirely. If Infosys exists in France, it can always include non-compete clauses if it wants, but a French tribunal throws those things out the window as soon as the case is filed.
Indian law needs an upgrade before things will get better.
This happens disheartingly frequently in the business arena. Successful company is bought by large conglomerate and disappears entirely.
What is the point of buying a company if you are already intent on killing its star product ?
The Lido just folded in Paris. It was purchased three months ago by the Accord group. Don't tell me that they were not aware of financial issues at the time of purchase, so why did they follow through ? Because Accord wanted to shut down the Lido ? A world-known icon of Paris night life ?
Who makes those decisions ?
And then was surprised that the results were not appreciated. Well duh.
I don't really care that he created a response bot on 4chan. What irks me is that he wasted resources on training a so-called AI in the worst possible environment.
This is why we should not use the term AI to describe what these things are doing. There is no intelligence involved.
"80 percent of business leaders have either installed monitoring software or are considering it"
So that is going to be your excuse to drag everyone back into the office ? Monitoring software.
Is there going to be any monitoring of management PCs ? I guess not.
We have not read any reports of reduction of productivity during the lockdowns, but now, all of a sudden, management is worried that we might not be 100% dedicated to our work.
I have in mind a saying (don't remember how it goes) about how, if you suspect someone of something, it's because you yourself are capable of it.