Posts by Pascal Monett 18221 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
Make no mistake. Xi can throw as many undesireables he wants into "reeducation" camps, the sheer market potential will ensure that ginormous tech giants will always be at the door, begging to get a slice.
Russia has less than 150 million people, and they are spread over many time zones. Claiming to support Ukraine is the current fad, and the tech giants will come back later whatever happens saying "now it is time to heal the wounds". They will say that whether Ukraine still exists or not.
China is a totalitarian dictatorship much like Russia.
You cannot claim to support freedom and rush to invest into a billion-sized market that is under near-total surveillance.
Your cupidity belies your words.
When Windows 95 came out, it was all the rage. I got the Vader "but you are not a Jedi yet" wav and set I don't remember what Windows sound to it.
I am still a rabid Star Wars fan, but that wav lasted all of two days before I banned all Windows sounds from all my computers forever more.
I just can't stand useless noise, and a computer's only right to make noise is when I'm playing a game.
Was nothing but a glint in Vint Cerf's mind.
Debugging by phone still happens. Not all your family members have TeamViewer installed (even today, not everyone in your family is using Zoom), and as for asking them to configure a Windows Remote Connection, forget about it.
And it's always urgent, isn't it ?
Illegal, yes, undoubtedly.
Illogical ? Not so much. Putin has already made clear his distaste with NATO, and Ukraine is a nice buffer zone to keep NATO troops further from his borders. It is no secret that Putin has always refused a NATO-subscribed Ukraine.
Inexplicable ? Even less. If I'm not mistaken, Ukraine has been making moves towards becoming a member of the European Community, as stated in the wiki : "The EU and Ukraine are seeking an increasingly close relationship with each other, going beyond co-operation, to gradual economic integration and deepening of political co-operation ".
Ukraine part of the EU means Ukraine part of NATO, and that is a big no-no in Putin's book.
So not inexplicable at all.
Sure. Because you have all the required variables to determine the cost of a headache.
Although I am apparently immune to that scourge, I can see the effect a headache has on my wife, and I have a friend who is subject to migranes. Everyone knows that a powerful migrane means locking oneself up in a dark, silent room and suffering until it goes away.
That's not fun in any book.
But assigning a cost to a headache ? Come on, did you just tally the number of days taken sick and call it a day ?
What about people who have headaches but keep on working and don't say anything about it ? Some headaches are minor inconveniences, and I'm sure that, in a culture like the Japanese have, they won't let a minor inconvenience get in the way of doing their job. So, no cost there then ? They are still inconvenienced, they might work more slowly, or have to check twice. That's time lost, ergo cost, but you have no way of counting that.
$22.5 million a year is a large number, but I have a tendancy to file it with declarations of the "this virus cost that many billions to the industry" sort.
In the round filing cabinet.
So, if I understand that correctly, there is no publicly elected official that found any problem with said plan, it was up to private companies to put the kibosh on another Big Brother tentacle.
That says volumes on just how twisted Democracy can be.
Sometimes, I think that a Benevolent Dictator just might be a better solution.
This charge had better have a solution that is as easy to manage as passwords are.
It's not my fault that the Joe User can't be arsed to manage his passwords properly.
I do, and I do not want my fingerprints, eye scans or tongue surface spread all across corporate databases managed by the summer intern.
If one of my passwords gets compromised, I can change it. I can't change my fingerprints.
So, what's the passwordless solution ? I haven't heard of one yet and, if somebody had an actual solution, I'm sure we'd be hearing about it and seeing it implemented already.
People are being killed in an unjustified agression and these clowns think they are contributing to "the war effort".
Conti states that it will retaliate against any agression of Russian IT. WTF do you think Russia has been doing for the past decade ?
You started this shit. It's a bit late to get all high and mighty about it.
If Canberra has less high rise towers than Sydney, that might justify trialling the drones in Canberra. Towers inevitably create wind currents that can be finicky, and I don't think we have the coding chops to ensure that drones navigate through turbulence safely.
But apart from that, Canberra also has plenty of sunshine if I'm not mistaken. The drones can almost certainly be recharged by solar power, which would mean that they only cost maintenance, not energy.
I have no idea if this is fact, but it is plausible.
I'll have a tin of caviar and a bottle of champagne for delivery . . .
Somehow I doubt that said corrupt elite is going to feel much of a pinch at all.
Putin has been preparing his move since a while already, and I'm convinced that financial sanctions were on his list of things to mitigate. He will, obviously, have warned his ultra-rich friends, and the word will have spread because the rich have ways of finding things out when it comes to money.
So I'm guessing that the Russian rich will just have to take an extended vacation in their datchas on the shores of the Black Sea. Oh, the humanity.
Hmm. Namecheap urgently needs to put that statement in effect on China because Uighurs.
What's happening to Ukraine is not good in any way, but reacting now kinda demonstrates a certain level of bias that doesn't really look good when you take a step back and think about it.
But hey, let's go and punish Russia every way we can (while studiously ignoring that every statement can likely be applied to China as well). What's the worst that could happen ?
Not really, no.
It's one thing to have an opinion on stuff you've been told, it's another thing entirely to go off on a revenge campaign about what you think you heard.
He should have confirmed his suspicions first by asking pointed questions. On top of the fact that he visibly offered the drink just to get something he could thrash after the fact. That behaviour is despicable.
In any case, if it had been me, that would have been the last time I ever had a drink with that guy.
It's a mainframe, not a laptop. You support a mainframe for 25 years, not five.
If Fujitsu thinks that it's going to sell a mainframe that only has five years of support left, I think Fujitsu is in for a bad surprise.
They may as well stop making them now - as long as they still offer support until 2035, they just might still sell one or two.
I so agree with you. Especially when it comes to laptops, which are often delivered with a single partition for OS and data. So, when the inevitable Windows crash happens and you have to reinstall Windows, it wipes the disk and your data with it.
Once upon a time I insisted on having two HDDs, one for the OS, one for the data (and swap file). Nowadays, with SSDs and their size, a single disk is enough, but I still insist on a data partition and I install all my programs and put all my files there.
That way, when Borkzilla borks again, at least I can reinstall Windows without losing any actually important stuff.
Icon because Borkzilla still hasn't understood this.
Sorry, what is there to negociate ?
The US does not get EU citizen's data. Simple.
I can agree to an exception when an EU citizen is physically going to the US, but that is it.
And if the White House don't like it, it can stuff it where the sun don't shine.
Oh yeah, absolutely. We really need an identity verifying app on the most insecure, unupdated platform that has ever existed.
Bonus round : having to prove that you are the owner of the phone once you've "proven" your identity.
Different standards will create opposition to those initiatives ?
I'm already there, mate.
Oh good, Zuck is going to fill his Meta-fied Second Life with a bunch of virtual people. Then he will declare the Metaverse a success and spend his time chatting with bots.
And the rest of the world will watch him burn all his money on that particular pie in the sky.
I'm glad you believe that a computer program can teach itself. I can't wait to see how that turns Tay.
Be that as it may, Lite Mode has many advantages and there is no real reason to remove it.
It's like saying "the price of gas has fallen so low, we've stopped making economical cars". No, you don't stop saving data just because in India they have great mobile data plans. I have a budget of 4.5GB/month - normally more than enough. Recently, there was a storm that cut my fiber connection for three days. Working from home, I used up a total of 6.8GB during that time, with a nice 70% increase in my phone bill for that month.
Keep saving the data, you never know when you might need that.
Besides, less clutter on the backend will do good for everyone.
Well that's a big, fat single point of entry if ever I saw one.
Of course, I've been working in IT for more than a quarter of a century. I have no problem managing (checks list) around 200 passwords. I never use the same password twice, nor the same login.
But I know what I'm doing. People who view the Internet as their own personal shopping space, and their computing device as an enabler, those people simply cannot imagine everything that goes on behind and likely wouldn't understand if you explained it to them. It's a shopping cart, what's the problem ? That is their point of view, and I'm not going to blame them.
Maybe, just maybe, all this data sharing and consumer pressure just might end up in creating a world where everyone, not just IT professionals, have the means to really manage where their data is going and who can use it.
Maybe.
It would seem that a proper encryption scheme should also have a default implementation function/procedure.
Encryption is difficult. Even if you (like me) have no idea how difficult it actually is, there's largely enough history to demonstrate that fact.
So don't leave it up to the vendors. If you create an encryption scheme, give a default, secure, functional scheme that vendors can rely on.
That way, if they go their own route and screw up, it's entirely their own fault, whereas here you kinda built the scaffold for them to hang themselves.
But he said "a proper facial recognition system".
His point is valid in that specific, restricted area.
As in, a facial recognition system that does not just a picture, but LIDAR technology or somesuch to create a 3D map of the face on top of visual cues.
That should prove more difficult to cheat, whatever makeup you have.
Of course, if you go putting Silly Putty on your face and makeup on top of that, then all bets are off.
I guess facial regocnition is just doomed from the start.
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2025
