Re: Growing Up?
The problem isn't really in decentralization per se, but rather with the fact that any Joe Schmo can declare himself part of the infrastructure without having to prove that he knows what he's doing (he doesn't).
19497 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
Well he can still articulate.
Delivering will be exponentially more difficult given that he has fired or driven away most of the developers.
I wonder how his "search" for a new CEO is going ? I especially wonder what difference it would make to Twitter's image, given that everyone knows that said CEO will not be able to manage any differently than what His Muskiness accepts, so booting out the racists again is clearly off the table.
I disagree, somewhat.
The mistake was in implementing the plan on his own. What he should have done would be to present the idea to his manager and get approval.
Of course, that meant his idea could also have been shot down, but hey, them's the breaks.
Disclaimer : I was a long-time contributor to SETI@Home myself, and ran it on every computer I had at home, plus my work laptop if I could.
Yes, because in security nothing says success like an arbitrary financial goal.
Oh, and blockchain ?
Guys, if you actually manage to implement blockchain successfully where security is concerned, that will indeed be an achievement.
No it didn't.
$760K out of $3+ million is definitely not most of that spend.
Now, 8 petabytes of data is nothing to sneeze at, that's for sure. But, if you have a budget of over $260K/month, you have enough money for servers, a local SAS implementation running over 100Gbps fiber and money to spare for the aircon bill and fire suppressing installation.
Apparently, The CloudTM does not give you any savings on the IT personnel budget, since there is still need of a bunch of skilled admins to oversee it properly, so you have the people required to manage all that locally.
I'm curious to see next year's local bill and find out just how damning it is for The CloudTM.
Oh good. Violating the privacy of 300+ million individuals on a daily basis gave you less than a dozen useful cases.
That declaration in itself would be enough for me to tell them to take a hike. Then I'd go and create an even more restrictive law.
Plus : this is about spying on Americans, and the NSA is the one deciding what it can tell ?
Sorry buddy, you are talking to the elected representatives of your own country about your activity concerning your own citizens. You spill all the beans, or you go to jail.
Simples.
Not sure they've been trying that hard. After all, the Vatican is one of the richest places on the planet.
And the Catholic church has historically had dissentions in its ranks about the wealth of cardinals and such.
So it's more a case of "do as I say as not as I do" when the church is talking about Jesus being poor.
That is not, however, an excuse for paying one guy enough money per year to support 10,000 families. He's not doing the work of that many people.
Sure, his work is important and it is important that he know what to say, when and how to say it and to who. Those things are complicated and require an above-average intelligence, to be sure. But they're not worth $50 million a year - especially when that is on top of all the other stuff he gets.
A physical description.
From a phone call.
There is no way anyone can infer anything physical from a voice over radio or phone. I cannot begin to count the times have I heard someone's voice on the radio, only to be shocked when I found a pic or a YouTube video featuring that person.
Some people sound younger than they are, some sound much more mature, and being fat or not is not something you can detect by voice alone (let's not even mention height).
Most of the time, the one and only physical trait you can possibly derive just by voice is whether that person is male or female (and even then, it can be tricky).
Short answer : that was a stupid question.
I'm starting to feel like it will almost be sad when Twitter dies for good. Almost. So many jokes that won't be made anymore . . .
Because that is where Musk is going with Twitter : to the chopping block.
And once Twitter is dead, we can finally stop hearing about how that twat is such a genius.
His management sucks (surprise, surprise).
So, they're already lying through their teeth ?
Not only is Borkzilla not including the features that people want and need (aka good performance and no headaches), but it can't be arsed to lay down the rules transparently.
I thank my lucky stars that I don't need to use this shite on a daily basis.
I think it is time for governments and government institutions to realize that it is not because they say it's secure that it is.
Neither is it secure because whoever they contracted to do the job said it is.
And it's especially not secure simply because the contract said it had to be.
It's not secure until a proper security research firm has confirmed that it's secure.
That is 2494 times too many.
Any sane code should control how long it's been since it downloaded that specific data block. If less than 10 minutes, there's absolutely no reason to automatically query it again.
Manually, you do what you want, but automatically you tone it down.
The Internet does not belong to your code.
Okay, I have just one question : what exactly is "water-rich" when mentioned by scientists ?
I understand that it's not you drill a pipe into it and water flows, but much more you mine a cubic meter and squeeze the water out of it.
Okay, fine, but how much water are you going to get out of that cubic meter ?
Because if you only extract one liter, that's a lot of work for not much water.
Sure they will. Because none of them have a smartphone, or each other's number.
This is insane. They're shareholders, they own the company, and you want to tell them how they should make their decisions about it ?
Only in a totalitarian state can you push such nonsense and expect it to work.
But Capitalism doesn't want healthy competition, it wants monopoly and will do everything it can to obtain it.
Capitalism mandates that you block your competition from accessing resources, non-compete clauses accomplish that.
All this talk about healthy competition is just talk. We'll see how well the lobbyists prove that.
No they're not.
The Kool-Aid is still strong on this one. In Luxembourg all of my colleagues are talking about EVs. Luxembourg buys its electricity from Germany because, officially, it doesn't want nuclear energy from France. Never mind that Cattenom is providing nuclear energy to Germany, which is selling it right back to Luxembourg (with a markup, obviously), Luxembourg happily buys its energy from Germany.
Which is building 10 new coal plants because The Greens in Germany have won the war against nuclear.
Well done in any case. All those smug EV owners in Luxembourg can be happy that they've shifted their pollution to somewhere else.
I'm sure that'll work about as well as all those gym club subscriptions.
On the other hand, I'd take one for surviving the zombie apocalypse, gaming in peace from my underground bunker while the shuffling hoards decompose above.
I just need to find a Cheetos dispenser and I'll be good to go . . .
"But as we continued to analyse the results, it appeared that the accuracy was likely due to an effect in statistics called confounding – where models learn other variables which correlate with the true signal, as opposed to the true signal itself"
I'm reminded of that chapter in Asimov's Foundation, where the declarations of some diplomat were passed through a logical analysis procedure to conclude that said diplomat had said absolutely nothing of substance or significance.
I still think we need a tool like that.
Hydrogen sounds like a nice idea, but as usual, when dreams hit reality the truth gets ugly.
And, in case you wish to dismiss just one voice raising concerns, here's another.
One thing is for sure, if hydrogen is indeed the chosen future, once again we're going to need nuclear to make it happen.
No. Just no.
Wind and solar are stopgaps at best. They're unreliable, don't produce enough energy and they create spikes on the grid.
If we are to replace all ICE vehicles with electrical ones, the only power source that can provide the energy to do so reliably is nuclear.
That does not mean that we need to continue with the dangerous reactor needing constant surveillance that we have now. Nuclear can ba safe, especially if we push for Thorium reactors which we should.
But nuclear will not be intermediary. It is the only future.
And ?
If I recall correctly, the Moon is a rather large body (as far as moons go). There's enough space for more than two, unless you're of the "everything is mine" mentality.
The real problem is going to be that, just like petrol on Earth, water is a finite resource on the Moon. It had better be managed better than the Colorado River, else there will be no long-term presence of Man on the Moon.