"ensure that non-EU suppliers cannot access the EU market on an equal footing"
No, they are designed to ensure that EU data stays in the EU.
If you don't like it, tough. That's the way the ball is rolling now and you're not going to stop it.
19177 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
Agreed.
When I saw the interview, the only thing I could think of is : this is a kid. He's got zero banking experience, zero CEO experience and the only reason he got the job is because venture capitalists are stupid and willing to give hundreds of millions to someone that just spouts the right bullshit.
If there is one thing that this crypto madness is demonstrating repeatedly, it's that you don't hand the responsability of money to someone who doesn't have more than a decade of experience handling money in a regulated environment.
There's a reason why the bank teller doesn't become head of branch in six months.
Depends on the bank you work with.
For my professional needs I have a bank in Luxembourg, the BCEE. The BCEE never sends me mail, I have a mail icon on my screen when I connect to my account via their secure website (secured by the traditional login name + password and a one time token) if a message is waiting for me.
To make any important change to my account, I have to physically present myself in one of the many branches, justify my identity and then ask for what I need.
I very much doubt that any criminal is going to be able to modify anything remotely.
Of course, if you live in the USA, things are very much different.
Excuse me, but a veteran is someone who is supposed to have significant experience in a particular domain or activity. Doing something once does not give you significant experience.
Fei Junlong was part of the second Chinese crewed mission, no problem there, but that does not make him a veteran.
If he is part of the next three crewed missions after this one, then he will have five missions under his belt and, like a WWII ace, will then likely deserve the term veteran.
But not before.
However, if ordering Amazon to play nice is a Good ThingTM, making that order come with a billion dollar fine would likely ensure more immediate compliance in my opinion.
Fines need to be redefined when a company makes more than a billion dollars a year. Even a $200,000 fine won't make them bat an eyelid. Fines need to be defined as X days of operational income (not benefits, sales income).
That will make these financial behemoths sit up and take notice.
It seems to me that this ginormous Ponzi scheme that is the crypto market shudders violently as soon as something contrary to utopia happens.
Crypto is based on fairy dust and all those exchanges are super professional and reliable, right up until they aren't. Then, like dominos toppling over, other super-professional exchanges suddenly have massive difficulties.
Funny, when Lehman Brothers bit the bullet I don't remember hearing about how Goldman Sachs suddenly froze customer access to their bank accounts.
Ah, the magical world of crypto, where everything is well until suddenly you've lost everything.
But by all means, keep sticking it to The Man !
Not to mention that their website figures the words Six Sigma multiple times - one basic entry in my Bullshit Bingo card.
Then there's the fact that they apparently have a rating for managers lifted directly from Judo : yellow belt, green belt, etc. First time I've heard of such a notion, but they'll happily explain it to you (for a fee, undoubtedly, even if it's just your phone number).
"These blatant actions reflect the true nature of Western services and their attitude towards their users."
More like :
"These legal actions reflect the true nature of Western services and their attitude towards their abusers."
I'm the last person to support anything Zuck, but criminal scum are criminal scum and I have even less sympathy for them.
From my personal experience :
I've bought Epson inkjet printers. About every two years when I was still using inkjet. Heads clogging, ink drying, etc, as has been said above, I've wasted God knows how much ink on so-called "cleaning" procedures.
Inkjets may be fine, but only at the condition that you are printing many pages every day. If you are printing a dozen pages a month, you're up shit creek without a paddle.
I bought a Samsung laser printer in 2010. It's still working fine, even when I only print a page a month.
Inkjets are green my ass.
"it would be for NHS England to come up with a process that commands the trust of the public and the professional alike"
Given the history of shambolic failures of NHS IT, I doubt any process would be sufficient to command the professional's trust, much less the public.
I don't live in England, but as soon as I hear the word Palantir outside of the Lord Of The Rings context, my brain is screaming "run !!" inside my head.
Good to know, obviously, but since the bigger problem is all the clueless idiots who will click an attachment without hesitation, I don't see that a new malware framework is a particular cause for alarm.
You could send them I Love You again and it would work just as well.
Agreed.
If Borkzilla hadn't completely fouled up, there might have been a third party but, guess what ? It's expensive to be part of that club.
Huawei is still going strong in China. I wonder if the UK competition watchdog has any complaint about how Apple and Google have barely any say over there.
That's an average of $2 million per person.
A far cry from the excuse that poor people invest in crypto because they can't get a loan to invest in housing.
Also, you're on a dating platform and, instead of angling to get invited for dinner, the person you're talking to starts mentioning money and investments ?
And you fork over the cash without even meeting in person ?
Damn, stupid is always managing to set the bar lower.
So that means that 85% of Internet users are ruining the experience for everyone else.
Well I'm sorry, but I'm part of the 15% and I'll be damned before I allow any website to have my biometric data for security.
Not until they either 1) prove that they cannot be hacked (yeah, right), or 2) tell me how I can change my fingerprints.
Mainframes and servers are very different beasts.
Mainframes have always been tailored to customer needs, and they have always been very expensive. That is why servers took off in the first place - you could have a server for a pittance (compared to a mainframe) and their power, reliability and feature set has never stopped growing.
Now, Intel is trying to shoehorn a subscription model to its line of servers.
Good luck with that.
So, only off-the-shelf software and no additional development ?
I guess that means that Air Traffic Control software is shrinkwrapped now, and that accounting software is installed pre-configured to your needs. That's nice.
So, all you really need to do is get Office 365 licensed across all your PCs and you're good to go, right ?
Bollocks.
There isn't a company in the world that use Salesforce out of the box (let's not even think about SAP). There is no company using Excel that doesn't have at least half of its business-critical data lying around in Excel files of various complexity. All those files are regularly touched up to respond to changing business decisions - touched up by people who most likely have no training and learned on the spot how to use Excel formulas. If you're using a mainframe, you are developing/maintaining software every day.
Proposing a contract for software with zero development included just means that you're going to have to propose another contract for development, or beg the supplier to "help" you configure and tailor whatever software you bought to your needs.
And that'll likely cost more than if it came along with the procurement contract.
And that was the beginning of the problem.
You bought X number of installs ? You get X number of licenses.
You want to install more ? Buy more licenses.
As much as I would love to rip on the US Navy on this occasion, it's more of a global administrative issue. Administration is very picky about what the peons that it controls do, very much less on what happens inside its own walls.
So don't go and give them any slack. They get what they pay for and no more.
Oh, isn't that nice.
Unfortunately, it's the UK that pushed for a rule that excludes non-EU members from getting EU funding. So yeah, go ahead and blame the EU for not wanting to "cooperate". The EU is just using the rules it has, rules that the UK is more than partially responsible for.
And, since you're no longer part of the EU, you can't go and have the rule changed.
But you've taken back control, so all is well, right ?
Booz.
Aptly named. Apparently, they have a rather drunken approach to operational data security.
Are those the same clowns who employed some guy who's Office version was hacked and not registered ?
Here's an idea, Booz : stop putting all your data into easily-accessible Excel files and use a real database with proper access controls.
Oh, sorry, silly me, that would mean work.
The ACLU wants a warrant to be served for installing police cameras on utility poles.
My question : to who do they serve the warrant ?
When the police have a warrant to investigate a house or an appartment, they serve it to the occupant of said habitation. That's normal.
So, who gets to see that warrant when it's a utility pole ? The mayor ? The inhabitants 100 meters around the utility pole ?
The ISS not even out of Earth's atmosphere, and what we are sending to the Moon is our fault (and it likely wouldn't survive on the lunar surface anyway).
Every bit of life we know of depends on Earth. That is fact.
Which is why it is scientifically a monumental thing if ever we discover even the smallest of bacteria somewhere else - anywhere else.
Ah, Borkzilla.
Seven years into The Last Windows Ever and not only is it not the last, but you have four different versions of it running on customer PCs and they all have endless bugs to correct.
One might wonder if the Development department is not introducing new bugs just for job security.