Are you kidding ?
Borkzilla is just putting the onus on you to know whether or not you should patch, aka business as usual.
Borkzilla has never put its money where its mouth is. it only ever puts your money where its mouth is.
19505 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
Is the poster child for "it works the way we want it" vs "it works the way the customers need it".
I'm curious to see who will win, the immensly weathly private company, or its Fortune 1000 customers.
I'm guessing that a single Fortune 1000 company can't hold a candle to the might of all them combined.
But that's just my guess.
Agreed, but the war on drugs is forgetting one little thing : the lessons of the Prohibition.
Therefor, they keep the war on, and keep the drugs illegal.
That's not the way it works. You want criminals out of the circuit ? Make whatever they sell legal. And controlled. And taxed.
Criminals hate taxes, so they leave. No soldiers required.
Indeed. A "verification" that costs six figures ? And needs a "final" verification, also in six figures ? I'm sorry, wasn't your first verification good enough ?
But of course, by that point the mark is desperate and the scum have got him by the short and curlies. I'm just wondering how many more times they could have strung him along before he finally twigged to the fact that an actual investment bank would only charge you a fifty for just about any verification there can be.
And actual banks only verify once. The verdict of that verification is final, even if you don't like it.
It's just sad to see that someone who managed his life well enough to retire with over two million bucks still can't just kick back and live the good life without being greedy for more.
If I had that kind of money I'd retire today and not worry about money any more.
""the pace of change is so fast that controlling it at the institutional level is just not possible anymore"
Well, and this is just a thought, maybe the institutional level didn't need to hop on to the bandwagon ?
If the Government was still working on mainframe with dedicated workstations on amber or green CRTs, I'm guessing that hackers, Russian, Chinese, Nork or otherwise, would be having a much harder time getting in.
Oh, and those pesky defense consultants with unlicensed Office versions would too. And we wouldn't be hearing so much about how TikTok is being "banned".
Now, I'm not saying that no change would have been preferable. By all means replace the CRTs with monochrome LED displays and a 1GB/s Ethernet connection, by all means. And upgrade the mainframe, or replace it with an AS/400 for sure.
But you didn't really need to get Windows.
They did not sink the Bismarck.
They brought the torpedoes that crippled the Bismarck's steering.
With the Bismarck going around in circles, the allied forces closed in and sunk her with cannon fire, the traditional way.
But of course, if the Swordfish hadn't crippled her, the allied forces would likely have had a much harder time of it.
This was not a question of broke, this was a question of administrative bungling.
It's always good to take a sharp knife to administrative issues that nobody has a hand on. Sends the cockroaches scurrying when their comfy nest is disturbed.
Now the telco, on the other hand, might have been the subject of a review from the fire department, i.e. a stern reevaluation of its usefulness and an evaluation of possible replacement candidates (which are likely not numerous).
Then again, it's a fire department. Not like they can afford to have phone issues for a week (or ten).
GMail allows you to recall a mail sent.
For about three seconds . . .
Honestly, if you are a major organization and still have, in this 3rd millenia, a mail server that blindly allows you to send CCs to more than a dozen mail addresses without a verification check or outright refusal without prior authorization, then I guess you have what you deserve.
It's been over a decade that we've all learned the hard way that Reply All should be practically banned, and sending mail to hundreds of external recipients at a time requires a process and overview that excludes any single operator.
But, as usual, the lesson still has to be learned the hard way.
Oh well, it's NHS. Par for the course, then. Carry on !
"Applying human analysis to the entire corpus of a package registry (~1.3 million for npm and ~450,000 for PyPI) just isn't feasible"
So the only thing the miscreants really need to learn is how to stay under a pseudo-AIs radar.
Simple ? Maybe not, but when they do get there, there will be plenty of time for mayhem before somebody twigs the coup and solves the problem. Then the miscreants will find another way.
Sword and shield, always.
And ?
Where is TikTok useful on a governmental level ? Are we also going to go into a tizzy about how governments are banning Angry Birds on their PCs ?
Why is it sooo important to relay the fact that governmental institutions don't want TikTok on their hardware ? Are we also going to hear about how banks are banning TikTok ?
Of course not, banks already have their hardware locked down.
So the lesson is : governments don't know how to lock down their PCs.
Am I supposed to be reassured by that ?
Ooh, so not fair ! You're blaming us for the exact same thing this other guy is !
Um, how can I say this. If you are looking at two lawsuits on two different continents with the exact same charges, you need to rethink your position.
Like, from Not Guilty to Guilty.
I'm sure that, with a trip to Putin's Russia and the application of a generous amount of dollars to a local general, you too can have your very own king-sized snowcone maker.
I would say about ten trillion dollars.
I'm sure that that would make Alphabet pay attention.
Because if you don't deliver an uppercut, it will just be defined as cost of business.
Well sorry, but this should not be a cost of business. This should definitely cost you your business.
But from a corporate point of view, slavery is fine.
Case in point : there is no shareholder movement against slavery, and nobody with any Apple sharers is standing up to say "Hey, cut it out with the slavery stuff. I don't mind making shiploads of cash, but no slavery".
Nope, they have the shares, hang on to them for dear life and wait for the money. How that money is made is not a problem. And that's where the problem is.
At some point, all this capitalism is going to have to accept that money does not excuse everything.
I won't hold my breath though.
Yeah, I can well imagine : zero success.
And the argument cannot go both ways, I think. Provider A was switching top floor access to Provider B. Company made a new contract with Provider B for ground level. The two are not linked, and the provider is not responsible for a connection that is never used.
Maybe, just maybe, Provider B could have sent an inquiry after two months, wondering if it was normal to have no activity on a connection, but come on - we all know that, as long as the bills are paid, there is no problem.
So, yeah. Check your billing.
Once again, fat-fingered keyboarding without proper checking results in massive pain for many people.
Ah, to think that, in the good ol' days, if a sysadmin goofed it would only affect the users of that company's network.
Today's sysadmins can affect people all across the globe.
Yay progress.
It's nice to not limit your options, but how many do you really have ?
I mean, if nobody is buying, then your only real option is having less stock.
And that's just a stopgap because again, if nobody is buying, your stock is still going to fall.
So, when you only have one share left per investor at 90 cents, what's left to do ?
Because apparently garnering interest or excitement is already out of the picture . . .