So, advertising doesn't bring in enough money then ?
$256 billion isn't enough to offer a free service ?
I think that's called greed, pure and simple.
18232 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
$256 billion isn't enough to offer a free service ?
I think that's called greed, pure and simple.
I'm sorry, but if I had €100 million in the bank, and suddenly found out that the bank's other customers had voted to liquidate my account, I would be pissed to the extreme.
As noted, it's hilarious to watch all these "decentralize" zealots suddenly rush to centralize when their feet go cold.
I love fireworks.
"Atos and the UK government have settled out of court in a case involving an circa $1 billion (£854 million) supercomputer contract for the UK's Met Office. The case brought by Atos was over claims that the Met Office and the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) had breached procurement law and unfairly dismissed the Atos bid, awarding the contract instead to Microsoft"
So, Atos pulled a Bezos but actually won, and is getting paid for it.
Good for Atos.
Indeed.
And I fail to see how a "financial giant" doesn't have personnel sufficiently trained to set up a server.
Ten years ago I set up a website for the company I was an associate in. It took me all of an hour to find the data to understand and properly lock down the .htaccess file to ensure that the entire file structure of our server would not be accessible.
I'm not an engineer, just a University-level graduate. It's not rocket science.
Even more impressive : the fact that there are still some people intelligent enough - and dedicated enough - to actually understand how our computers work and build the environment to demonstrate it.
Back in the day, I purchased the Norton's PC Bible. It was a very enlightening experience, finding out how things actually happened at the hardware level. Thanks to that book, I toyed around with creating moving objects in graphics mode on my 4-colour IBM-PC 640*320 CRT screen (that was high-resolution, back then).
These days, there is no more PC Bible, there is a PC library, and it would take years for a newcomer to grasp all of it.
Kudos to the creator of this tool.
"patch promptly, run anti-virus software, log off when away from one's desk, and encrypt data before transmission"
We're talking about government. That means that there's an IT department that calls the shots on patching.
As for encrypting, that would be difficult if IT has not installed and configured the tools to do so. The user is not supposed to be able to do that on his own, now is he ?
And if you think I'm logging off to go take a piss, I have news for you : I'm pressing Windows-L to lock my session and not lose my work.
I appreciate the intent, but there's a lot here that doesn't really depend on just the user.
Well, there's this article.
Conspiracy much ? I don't think so.
Um, except you have.
In the Age of the Internet, it really is a bad idea to blatantly spout nonsense that can be proven wrong with a simple search.
Apparently, some companies really think that people are just going to trust whatever they say blindly.
Doesn't work like that, guys. It really doesn't.
Not even if your name is Apple.
Xi Pooh still doesn't get it : silencing dissent does not erase it, it just pushes it underground where you cannot see it anymore.
Xi will get his clear, shining landscape of beautiful, happy citizens, but underneath there will be a festering pile of hatred and malcontent which, when it explodes (and it will), will be swift and devastating.
I can see that and I'm not even a historian, much less a psychologist.
I disagree. Assange is not and never has been a journalist of any kind, let alone an investigative one.
He is an asshole, but that's beside the point.
All he did was recieve information and publish it. The US Government didn't like that, but that's not necessarily a reason to slam a foreign national into a US jail.
After all, the US jealously guards all its nationals that did hideous things in other countries, so what goes around should come around.
My wife has a Samsung Galaxy A3.
So do I.
Yet, because her model is a year before mine, she doesn't have the same connector.
I will readily admit that I am fed up with these shenanigans. I have been forced (business reasons) to use a mobile phone since 2006, and not a single one has come without a specific charger and cable.
If you want to plug a desktop PC, on the other hand, the same cable has been in use for the past twenty years.
Stop the insanity.
I have had my fill of the cattle class.
If I ever even think of taking a plane again, I'm paying a first-class ticket.
The price alone will be an incentive to stay put, but if I really, really want to get somewhere by plane, I will no longer be stuck in a seat next to a whale.
I'm 56 years old now. I'm done with putting up with constraints.
I want my comforts, and I'm ready to pay for them (just not rich enough to charter a private jet).
Even if you can argue that maybe this young lady could have been a bit too sensitive, I think it is high time we put a stop to this widespread Internet habit of insulting people simply because you're not standing in front of them.
People on the Internet say things they would never dare saying face-to-face. Maybe that's something for the psychiatrists, I don't know, but it is time to clamp down on that.
How long before people finally understand that there is no Nigerian prince, no free lunch and nobody begging to give you money ?
Wake up, people. Money is earned by hard work (unless you are a member of the 1%, in which case your money is earned just by you breathing).
With all the precedents that have been set, and continue to be, you still hire Chinese nationals in national-security-sensitive or highly-demanding engineering posts ?
Shouldn't there be a bit more background research before hiring when the individual comes from China ?
You really bring it on yourselves sometimes.
You didn't get it : the Metaverse is going to be all holograms. All that hardware stuff is completely ignored since El Zuck specifically said that "Your TV, your perfect work setup with multiple monitors, your board games and more – instead of physical things assembled in factories, they'll be holograms designed by creators around the world".
So, see ? You won't need any of that, they'll be holograms.
Oh, wait . . .
Indeed.
Apple has that much money sitting in the bank. So does Google. If they want something done, they have the means to get it done.
The State should keep its money for things that its citizens don't have the means to pay for, and not give that money away to insanely rich companies that have more money than a small country.
What's the unit smaller than a nanometer ?
Are we going to start counting in atoms ?
Because, correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought I had already read that we are approaching the physical limits of the Universe. Just as you can't do colder than absolute zero, you can't go smaller than the size of an atom.
So, are we there yet ?
"no longer see it as a mere cloud data warehouse and to view it more as a platform for sharing data and data-analytics applications"
What is the function of a "mere" cloud data wharehouse ? To have data accessible in The CloudTM. So how can a cloud data wharehouse not share data and whatever else is running there ?
This is nothing but a marketing announcement, and nobody but salespeople and amoebas with one brain cell are going to buy into it.
First of all, what we need is companies that pay their taxes.
And my whole point is that we need to rethink this situation.
Just saying that we need Apple to make ever-more-expensive shiny tat that ends up landfills is not a solution.
It might be time for us, as a society, to start re-thinking this endless yearly product cycle.
We do not need a new Iphone model every year. A phone should be able to last five years without trouble, so make your new model cycle over five years and everyone will be happy (well, except for those who absolutely have to spend a thousand bucks a year to prove that they are better than everyone else).
In truth, I have to admit that that does not seem unreasonable.
At the condition that the trade is made internationally. Currently, I make purchases on Amazon.fr. That, to me, means that whatever international taxation there is has already taken place. If that's not the case, they should clean that part up, but I fail to see why I should be contacted for international taxes when I'm buying stuff stored in France from a French web site.
Looks like another storm in a teacup from where I'm sitting.