"a great time to snag an SSD"
Hmm, now there's a good point. I'll have to keep on the lookout for that.
19180 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
I'm sure that, with a trip to Putin's Russia and the application of a generous amount of dollars to a local general, you too can have your very own king-sized snowcone maker.
I would say about ten trillion dollars.
I'm sure that that would make Alphabet pay attention.
Because if you don't deliver an uppercut, it will just be defined as cost of business.
Well sorry, but this should not be a cost of business. This should definitely cost you your business.
But from a corporate point of view, slavery is fine.
Case in point : there is no shareholder movement against slavery, and nobody with any Apple sharers is standing up to say "Hey, cut it out with the slavery stuff. I don't mind making shiploads of cash, but no slavery".
Nope, they have the shares, hang on to them for dear life and wait for the money. How that money is made is not a problem. And that's where the problem is.
At some point, all this capitalism is going to have to accept that money does not excuse everything.
I won't hold my breath though.
Yeah, I can well imagine : zero success.
And the argument cannot go both ways, I think. Provider A was switching top floor access to Provider B. Company made a new contract with Provider B for ground level. The two are not linked, and the provider is not responsible for a connection that is never used.
Maybe, just maybe, Provider B could have sent an inquiry after two months, wondering if it was normal to have no activity on a connection, but come on - we all know that, as long as the bills are paid, there is no problem.
So, yeah. Check your billing.
Once again, fat-fingered keyboarding without proper checking results in massive pain for many people.
Ah, to think that, in the good ol' days, if a sysadmin goofed it would only affect the users of that company's network.
Today's sysadmins can affect people all across the globe.
Yay progress.
It's nice to not limit your options, but how many do you really have ?
I mean, if nobody is buying, then your only real option is having less stock.
And that's just a stopgap because again, if nobody is buying, your stock is still going to fall.
So, when you only have one share left per investor at 90 cents, what's left to do ?
Because apparently garnering interest or excitement is already out of the picture . . .
The data hardly needs to be on the Internet to be vulnerable.
All it needs is some clueless luser who clicks blindly on every attachment in his Inbox without questioning for a second why this person he doesn't know and has never met is sending him an xslm file (or pics of a scantily-clad female).
In Sci-Fi, it looks great. Holographic screens, near-weightless glasses that do real-time augmented reality without any lag, stutter or power issues, magical interfaces that interpret exactly each and every wave of the hand or keyword spoken to it and doesn't get confused by conversations going on around or in front of it, Sci-Fi shows the awesome power of what could be. If there wasn't that pesky thing called reality, that is.
Reality means that you need a helmet on your head in order to have your eyes covered by a screen. Said helmet needs batteries, and those things are not lightweight. It mostly needs to be tethered to the workstation as well, or you won't be using it for long.
And you can get physically sick.
But the idea endures. Even when it has been killed by public apathy, like the zombie it rises again as soon as some new tech makes someone with deep pockets believe that it could be feasible.
It's the tech that just won't die, because Sci-Fi makes it look so cool.
Meanwhile, almost everyone is getting bored with Cortana.
Go figure.
Orbital mechanics are complicated, you need engineers to calculate things right.
I think that gaining altitude is a lot more costly in energy than losing altitude, but I am far from being an authority on that question.
I'm pretty sure that, if NASA wants to de-orbit the ISS, it's likely because that will be the least expensive option.
"will also be responsible for disposing of their own parts safely"
Somehow I very much doubt that Russia will be doing much about the ISS any time soon, it seems to be a bit more preoccupied by Earthly matters at the moment.
NASA is going to have to shoulder that burden, I fear.
Point #1 : fast results.
Google has never made me wait a few seconds before giving a result. Results are near instant on Google. The few times I did try Bing, results were rather quick as well.
I doubt people are going to accept waiting for anything more than a second, generally. If this BingBot needs to put down its coffee before getting to work, people will not be using it for long.
The camera has been lying since day one.
Ever since images have been captured, people have been looking for ways to influence the result to their need or desire.
And with digital, it has simply exploded.
Including some cloud manipulation is par for the course these days.
Samsung is lying, bears in the woods, call me when something new is actually happening . . .
Not quite. Encryption itself was not illegal, but strong encryption was.
As such, the French version of Notes 3.x had 64-bit encryption enabled, but only used 40 bits effectively. The first 24 bits had been handed over to the French government, so that it could be easier for them to decrypt emails (because the French government only had itty bitty CPUs to decrypt stuff with and nobody actually knew how anyway).
Thankfully, this nonsense fell out of fashion and, since R6, everyone is using full-fat 128 bit or better encryption.
Check it out here.
Even Twitter did not invent all the mistakes.
Yes, it has invented a pile of new ones, but this kind was old before the Internet was born.
And I'm sorry, but when I'm told to unplug something, it's not my job to ensure data or function continuity. You said the Sharepoint team was now in charge and the Notes database could be wiped ?
It's wiped. Go cry next door.
Ah but Catholic priests do not take the vow of chastity, they take the vow of celibacy.
It's the nuns that take the vow of chastity, demonstrating once again the positively Midieval mindset of the Roman Catholic Church. Men ? Don't marry, but you can diddle. Women ? Ain't nobody touching you but the Holy Ghost in your dreams.
Personally, I couldn't care less if a priest is gay or not.
Just leave the children alone.