"But then, you get to, like, 10 million training examples, it becomes incredible"
Great news.
Call me when it becomes reliable.
Oh, and useful.
19553 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
Once again, the required law already exists and it is not necessary to write an entirely new law.
What needed to be done was simply to modify the existing law to not restrict warrants to phone and tech companies, but consider that it targets any company that has data to sell.
In these modern times, lawmakers need to write laws for today while keeping an eye open for what might exist tomorrow.
The wiki article on that states that "Pancreatic cancer is the fifth-most-common cause of death from cancer in the United Kingdom,[17] and the third most-common in the United States", so I think it's more of a coincidence than anything else.
Another "hmm, that's strange" moment in scientific history that will likely produce a major discovery and, possibly, new mechanics in astrophysics.
I'm rather excited about this, can't wait to hear about it from scientific sources.
That said, the data has been stored for the past three decades, and they only find it now because nobody was looking for it before ?
Somebody get an AI on that data, pronto. For once we have something a statistical analysis machine can actually be good for, it would be shame not to.
The wiki article on Kagoshima says nothing about kidnapped Korean potters, it states that nineteen young men "broke the Tokugawa ban on foreign travel, traveling to various industrial locations in The UK before returning to share the benefits of the best of Western science and technology".
Besides, it's hardly because nation-state kidnapping was a thing in the past that it is a good idea to go ahead and do it today. Slavery was also a thing, so why bother with autonomy while you're at it ?
A small step for Borkzilla, a giant leap for cloud network administrators.
And it took a breach to make that available. The fact that retaining cloud log ability had been considered acceptable by a provider is not really surprising. The fact that potential customers found that acceptable is just the demonstration that it is not technical people that wanted The CloudTM to happen, it was the CEO's nephews and the bragging rights that it erroneously conferred.
Any admin worth the name would have seen the paltry amount of tools at his disposition, compared to what he had available with his on-prem servers, and scoffed at the idea that he should hand over his data to a server he barely had any control over.
Except nobody asked the admin's opinion in the mad dash to be the coolest cloud kid on the block.
Well, at least now some semblance of sanity is emerging from the morass.
Well I think it was pretty effective. Let's see what the experiment has brought in so far :
1) Ordering a vast swath of peons (2000+ is not a small number when it concerns people) to have their internet cut off without warning leads to vast, immediate and (possibly) angry response from said peons
2) Understanding that the default choice should always be opt-in, and making the announcement general, soothes the flock and keeps the peons happy
That in itself was quite effective, at least to bring Google management out of the Soviet era of management. One can only hope that the evolution will be permanent, but I'm not holding my breath. The speed with which manglement can forget past lessons is truly awe-inspiring (in the bad sense).
This is going to be fun to watch.
A server in a datacenter is dependant on a lot of things outside of its hardware specifications. There's the contract type and level, there's the possible load and there's undoubtedly a lot more things I'm not aware of.
If those datacenter CEOs think they're going to be able to use a statical analysis machine to try and minimize power usage, I'm looking forward to a lot of griping among customers when they launch a full load of processes outside of their regular habits only to find that the server power they're paying for is not available on demand.
Either that, or I fail to see what use the AI will have, because if the boxen are already configured to idle when not on demand (which they defnitely should be), then what use can AI be ?
Even for solving the fat-fingered configuration problem, it's not the AI that will invent the order. So, instead of a fat-fingered configuration problem, AI will only upscale the issue to fat-fingered ordering problem.
So, progress ?
As I'm well on my way to becoming an older adult, I have a question : could these scammers please start sending their missives by snail mail ?
I mean, that gives an entire other level of authenticity and importance, doesn't it ?
That way, I could laugh all the way to the trash bin at the thought of all that money they're wasting on me . . .
Oh well, one can dream.
Hmm, it's not mentioned specifically, but might there be a chance for an execution log in that new "oversight" layer ?
You know, a log that states what was asked, what was checked and what was approved ? Seems to me that "oversight" should require that, otherwise you're just asking a black box to ruminate over another black box and you've got no better guarantee than when you started.
But of course, as CEO of an investment firm, he needs to make noise to make his company more visible, so yeah, let's wax lyrical about how black boxes can control other black boxes without any means of checking what the hell is going on. It makes for good PR, right ?
I remember being skeptical back when El Reg first described these aerobatics, and getting the downvotes as well.
It would seem that the downvoters refuse to admit that it's a hair-brained idea best left to the drawing board.
Yes, I know they used to recover film from spy satellites like that, but a roll of film dangling from a parachute is a far cry from a first stage rocket booster.
And now, Rocket Lab has officially ended the practice. They tried and they stopped trying after seven failures. That should be enough to take a step back and reevaluate the situation, no ?
So, Meta makes over $5.5 billion per quarter for nothing good or wholesome.
No wonder ad services are considered the holy grail. Anybody who wants to make money wants ads to fling left, right and center.
Actually providing a service worthy of subscription is so last milennia . . .
"It is not possible to implement technical controls preventing the use of personal email accounts for government business"
Yes, it is. All you need is a bespoke mail client that has the proper restrictions in place.
Of course, that means not using Outlook, which is something you should avoid anyway.
Either that, or you put National Security to good use for once and you force Microsoft to make a special, military-grade Outlook.
But don't just say it's not possible.
So he was operating on faulty assumptions. I don't want to be harsh, but it seems that an admin should always check that what he's doing is the right thing, otherwise mayhem might ensue.
He didn't make sure, and he paid the price (one lost XMas evening).
I'm not necessarily saying that an admin should consult the manual every time, but I would have thought that, just before sending a command that should reconfigure the entire network (not something you do every day, I guess), it might be a good thing to double-check and be sure.
Oh well, he's learned his lesson.
Yes and no. The majority of failures are about getting to LEO in the first place. Either the rocket blows up, or its engines fail to provide the necessary thrust for the required amount of time, or something goes haywire with the guidance system . . . The possibilities of failure are almost endless.
If the rocket manages to get to LEO, you've arguably done the hard part. The rest all depends on how rigourous the programming was, how complete the tests were and how prepared the whole project was. Sending the probe depends on Newtonian physics. There are no surprises there.
Getting to LEO is a roll of the dice. After that, it's mostly your fault if something fails.
Only created by AI ?
I don't know, check this out : https://this-person-does-not-exist.com/en.
Yes, a lot of faces can be spotted as fake, but some are very convincing.
And you'll never see the same face twice.
So, the project is eight years overdue and current hardware will be obsolete in five.
They forecasted a major emergency comms project to only work for less than fifteen years before requiring everything to be replaced ?
Golly, with planning like that, who needs catastrophes ?
Tell you what, guys, I'll do you a favor : give me £15 billion now and I'll have something working by next year, promise. I don't know what yet, but for £15 billion I'll wrack my brain and get it to work.
Yes, apparently VMware is a lame duck. Utterly incapable of ensuring healthy competition. Lacking vision. Etc.
With all those compliments, it's lucky Broadcom is being nice. I shudder to think of what they would be writing if they decided to get nasty.
And apparently the blame is being laid at marketing's doorstep. That should be a strong hint for the salesdrones at VMWare to polish their CV and start finding employement elsewhere.
Then again, they're salesdrones. They always have their CV ready to go elsewhere.
You mean this guy ?
This "Celsius Network Roni" ? Pro tip : if the name you use at work is not the name on your birth certificate, you're either an actor, a porn star or a criminal. You most certainly are not a professional businessman, even if you do wear a suit and a tie.
So he "assists in the development of sales strategies and the identification of a variety of difficulties and obstacles" at Celcius ? Seems like he mainly worked to find ways to cheat the law, maximize sucker income and sing the siren tune of unbelievable interest rates (because they were not real).
And now, like the cockroach sent scurrying from the light, he is running from Justice. I'm guessing he may be smart enough to go to a country that doesn't have an extradition treaty with the USA (not guaranteed, but still possible) - which are, for the most part, poor, 3rd-world countries. I'm also guessing the FBI have his accounts frozen, so I hope he had the foresight to stash some funny money into an account that he can still access from whatever straw-thatched hut he's living in now.
In any case, I'm sure he'll be living la vida loca for $2/day for the foreseeable future, unless he's stupid enough to get himself caught for something (not impossible either). Fugitive from justice sure gives you time to reflect on how not smart you actually were when you decided that scamming people with false claims and newfangled non-tech was a good idea. Of course, it gives you time, but the intelligence to recognize that doesn't come giftwrapped with it.
And it has forever been so. The only thing is, back in the glorious days of VHS, you could take one look at that FBI warning, snicker and press Fast Forward to get of it and all the useless previews that followed. These days ? Put the disk in and go prepare your snack/dinner/whatever, because you've got at least five minute of unskippable shit occupying your screen before you can actually watch the movie you intended to.
Pirates ? They've got the same movie on a USB key or NAS and, when they want to watch it, they prepare their snacks beforehand because when they press PLAY, the movie starts.
I'm starting to think the pirates may not be entirely wrong . . .
Her contract can be as solid as granite, Elon has history in not respecting contracts (at least, at Twitter).
He's already not paying rent, not paying cloud bills and likely many other bills. What makes you think he's going to pay her golden parachute ?
She's lucky if she's being paid her salary, at this point.
Funny that. On all PCs that I control there is the persistent ubiquity of NoScript and UBlock Origin.
I wonder why . . .
That being said, this report is entirely from Democrats (and Bernie). I expect a flurry of Republicans to jump to the defense of poor little Google any minute now.