
Thank you India
Now all we need is for every other country to fine Google for $250 million and we might get the PlayStore fees under control.
18232 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
Thank you, NSA, for your contribution to criminal organizations everywhere.
Putin must be laughing his ass off.
Meanwhile, instead of suing Zurich, Mondelez should sue Washington DC.
And, while I'm at it, there should be a law stating that a company that holds more than one brand should have its name on the packaging of every product it sells.
That way, people will know who it is they're buying from.
Intel has no more leadership window.
PR bullcrap is all very nice in announcements to the public and to investors, but the fact is that AMD, the once-eternal underdog, has taken first place in the technology race.
Intel is now running behind.
It's nice to see a change at the top.
Thorium reactors can use "used" nuclear reactor fuel in addition to Thorium, and they produce comparatively little waste which lasts vastly less long.
On top of that, they do not need active surveillance because, if the reaction gets too hot, the salt plug melts and all the reactive material just drops into retaining pans. The reaction stops automatically.
All you need to do after that is wait for the existing matter to cool down, put in a new plug, scoop it all up and start over (of course, I am aware that this is a largely oversimplified version of reality, but I'm not a nuclear scientist, nor even an engineer).
The thing is, nobody wants to do Thorium reactors because everyone wants to get the Plutonium that EPR reactors make, to make more bombs.
We have more than enough bombs.
Let's get back to making civilization function.
Okay, for me that begs the question : how many 1U units can a rack hold ?
Because if 2KW units are put in a 42KW rack, it should hold at least 21 of them.
But if 21 units is less than half the rack's capacity, that would mean that a rack can hold in excess of 42 units.
Did I get that right ? How tall are those racks anyway ?
The difficulties in landing anything on Mars is demonstrably non-negligeable - and that is just for stuff that was never meant to take off and come back.
This time, they want to send a robot that not only has to land intact, but must also rejoin the rover, extract the sample tubes, store them safely, and then take off and come back to Earth.
And all of that, practically on its own.
The difficulty of this mission is exponentially higher. If the engineers manage to pull this off, that will be one hell of a feather in their cap.
He's already been very publicly humiliated by Ukraine, which didn't just roll over when Russian troops came to invade. What a surprise.
70 years of NATO doctrine stated that the Russian army was a formidable adversary. Six months of Ukraine says they're incapable of anything but retreating and waiting for General Winter.
It would seem that Putin has let the Russian army languish in 1970. He doesn't have the means to meaningfully harm any satellite constellation, either militarily or financially.
But let's cut to the chase : space will become a battlefield, because there are just too many selfish pricks in positions of power that cannot resist doing that.
Was that a picture of him on stage ?
Is there an unwritten rule that says that now, all CEOs on stage must dress like their teenage son ?
Why isn't he wearing a suit ?
He's the CEO of a company that brought in $79 billion in 2021.
Steve Jobs is dead. Wear a suit.
So Mars has protected Earth from at least one asteroid impact, and Bruce Willis can rest easy for a while longer.
Now, I'm guessing that an asteroid that's only 0.54 brontosauri wide is kind of difficult to detect beyond the orbit of Mars, but doesn't this mean that, when Musk will be living on Mars, he's going to need to have some form of asteroid alert system ?
And now I've just realized : on Mars you'll never see a shooting star.
Hey Roy, why not go all-out and sack 40% ?
You'll be hailed as a visionary and the "other stakeholders" (ie shareholders) will be overjoyed by the drop in costs.
Oh, there's just the little problem of sustaining sales but, if you keep the marketing department, that shouldn't be a problem, right ?
"The days when users have to know there's even such a thing as a file format, let alone how to handle one, should be long gone"
It is exactly the ignorance of the file format that allows miscreants to trap the clueless into clicking on attachments.
You cannot drive without a driver's license.
You shouldn't be able to use a computer without a computer license.
Know what you're doing.
That's a nice idea, but in a civilization that creates almost everything to not be repairable (looking at you, Apple), it's going to be a bit difficult to achieve.
Yes, in a car you can replace almost everything, but cars cost a lot of money and people will very quickly get very mad if they're told that thay have to buy a new one because the left axle broke down.
Anything with a circuit board ? Forget it. If it breaks, you buy a new one. The industry doesn't encourage ripping it open, testing what's broken and replacing it. Apparently, it's not "customer-friendly".
So you're going to need a nice, big salmon to slap the CEOs of those companies who sell stuff that basically can't be repaired, and use that salmon until they get a clue.
Why does there need to be a law on this ?
Simple decency says that you do not serve on the board of two competing companies.
If you are on the board of two companies and they enter into competition, the you resign from one of them.
Ah, yes, silly me : decency. That rarely exists at the Board level.
Programming is still hard. I see that every time I explain basic Excel functions to a new class. There's always at least one member of the audience whose eyes glaze over.
Low code ? You still need to know the result you want to obtain, and that's where many people fail to achieve the desired result.
I'm not saying that you need to be more intelligent to program. I'm saying that, to program, you need a certain mindset and, if you don't have it, you're going to have a lot of trouble trying.
It's like mathematics. I've never been good at maths. I cannot count the number of times when I told people that I am a programmer and they answered "well you're good at math then". No, I'm not. A programmer doesn't use math, a programmer uses logic.
There may be logic in mathematics, but I've never been able to understand it beyond basic calculus.
This low-code, AI-assisted stuff ? It's just going to create another nightmare like Access databases and Excel spreadsheet infestations.
How on Earth does that work ?
I get code obfuscation, I get memory management, I get encryption, but how do you hash an API call in a way that allows you to get a useful answer ?
I've used APIs before. If you don't send exactly the properly formatted call, you get an error in return.
So ?
Nobody needs to change their phone every year, and no phone is exponentially better than last year's version.
Eventually, I can accept changing every five years. Eventually.
I had to buy a new smartphone in 2012, because job change. It was a Samsung A3.
This year, all of a sudden it could no longer connect to my professional Gmail account, so I had to go and get a Samsung S22 (because no, I am not an Apple addict).
So, 2012 - 2022. That is a proper duration for a smartphone.
And that's the crux of the issue.
Managers today have to deal with the consequences of COVID, whic is mainly that their staff is no longer always there to be counted and under surveillance.
Maybe the pandemic willl have a good consequence, as in managers will start to pay attention to results, not just attendance.
But of course, that would mean that managers would actually become intelligent.
In what universe is that going to happen ?
Not really.
Beancounters have been on the rise for the past twenty years.
Why do you think there's a component shortage ? Because Just-In-Time delivery, which removed stock (which costs money), and beancounters are notoriously adverse to spending money.
Well they're going to be real happy now.