There's no coming back from that.
You don't want to ruin your brain like he did.
19435 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
He was even luckier that, after blatantly ignoring a direct order, he was allowed to keep his job.
I'm sorry, I'm all for giving a second chance if you have an idea and foul up on your own, but if I tell you NOT to do something and you go ahead and do it and foul things up just like I feared, you are off the team at the very least. With luck, you'll be holding the broom for the janitor. Failing that, you'll be looking for another job.
Might I add that it is a disservice to let the kid keep his job after such behavior. The lessons you don't forget are the ones that cost you the most, and this, apparently, didn't cost him much.
Ergo, there's a risk that he does it again.
I would not be willing to risk that.
Oh sure. Forget the millions and months (years ?) you put into your current three-legged horse and move to virgin land where you can start all over again (and pay all over again).
I understand that this is a brilliant plan for SAP. It's a shitty plan for its customers and they're not buying it.
That's because SAP has mistaken itself for something that holds its customers by the balls, and makes no bones about squeezing. Well, SAP's customers have other things to do then give their revenue to SAP.
Funny that, ain't it ? Would seem to me that you didn't need an MBA to understand.
You do need a shred of decency, though.
I have the answer to that :
The day we have finally birthed a true AI, we'll know it works because when asked a question it will answer :
Come back later, I'm busy watching videos on YouTube and posting stuff on TikTok.
On the main point of the article, I look forward to seeing Google's AI get thoroughly trashed by actual hackers. Has Google not read about Rozum ?
Well, maybe the British Parliament should augment the funding. On the BBC funding page, it states that the BBC is primarily funded by license fees. That's UK Gov who makes the decision.
It's all well and good for MPs to lament that their World Service is losing viewers, but if they are the ones who decided not to fund it properly, then why are they complaining ?
If the licensing fee gets too high for the consumer, then maybe it is time to think of subsidies if they want the BBC to be jewel in the British Broadcasting crown.
Because, historically speaking, programmers don't give a flying fuck about the amount of RAM their code uses.
This trend started when Windows 95 came out and RAM was a dime a megabyte.
The only way Redmond programmers are going to pay attention to their RAM usage is if their office gets as small as their RAM usage gets large.
They have required ? They can pay for it.
This is going to be fun to watch (from afar). Seems to me that all those geniuses who continue to build water-gozzling facilities in Texas are going to be in for a bad surprise, and they deserve bad surprise they'll get.
Here on Earth, we used to broadcast our emissions on radio. Okay, I'd like to know who could possibly pick up I Love Lucy from 50 light-years away, but that's not the point. The point is we, on Earth, are already going towards fiber for our communications. I don't think that 5G phone calls are going to be detectable after Pluto, but what do I know ?
In any case, I feel that there's a good chance that any ET civilization that wants to broadcast its existence is going to need to go the path of the variable pulsar rate, aka a powerful signal that could be confused with a wierd pulsar until some genius discovers some kind of ET Morse code and deciphers the message.
Then you have the Silent Civilization problem, where every intelligent ET society goes covert because they fear that, by broadcasting their existence, they invite invasion from a stronger ET civilization.
How's that for a Cold War, eh ?
Wow.
Seems that the economy is doing fine after all, if companies can expand their budget to accomodate their usual totally unnecessary computer replacement program.
We're not in 2003 any more. Any computer that you bought five years ago will still do the job fine now, especially for business usage and not gaming, or video production.
But hey, it's private money. Go ahead and waste it if that's what you want.
Yeah, I remember doing that as well when I started playing Doom.
You can argue all you want about what the actual workload was for these cells, the fact remains that Science has now created a bunch of living neurons outside of a human body and can "train" them do do a specific job.
In a hundred years, we'll have 100 billion of those cells replicated across a million T-400s and Skynet will be a thing.
Trump apparently wants to avoid putting boots on the ground because that would mean a full-fledged war and he would bear the responsibility of the outcome, even though I'm sure he would, as usual, apply his excellent slimy tactics at doing everything possible to avoid that.
He hates being responsible, so he just bombs Iran from above. It's true that that's a good way to avoid the blood splatter and lessens the cleaning requirements of the bombers.
I disagree.
A few kilometers of deviation means that it's orbit will be influenced differently by the planetary bodies (and moons) that it encounters on its way in.
Besides, the astronomer quoted in the article clearly stated that it could be the difference between the asteroid hitting Earth or missing it.
So, unless you can demonstrate that you have a better understanding of asteroid orbital calculations, I'd suggest you trust the astronomer.
The only unforunate element is that it's going to take years and Trump will never have to bear any of the cost, plus the President who will have to deal with the fallout will likely never have had anything to do with the whole issue.
But Porsche is already asking ChatGPT to give an estimate on how many new models it is going to sell to lawyers in the coming years, so it's not all bad.
The entire US Government is currently unsound.
That's one problem the Constitution has no solution for.
And given that the rest of the "elected officials" don't have the balls to stand up and demand respect, well . . .
Don't worry, we've got the same in France, except that we have a playboy wannabe who's too stupid to play in the grown-up arena.
Drug prohibition ? Ha !
The CIA did a lot to help the drug industry in order to finance its string of failed black ops.
If Venezuela is where it is today, it's due to CIA meddling in a large part.
Drug prohibition was only a good excuse to slap black people behind bars (since there ain't no cotton fields left, these days).
Could someone please explain to me the importance of this bullshit ?
Our currency is already digital. The number of times I have paid in cash in the past decade are vanishingly small.
So why is this suddenly an important issue ? Banks have already solved digital currency.
Instead of VISA, just create UKPay that does the same thing.
Problem solved.
Because criticising EVs is not Politically CorrectTM at this point in time.
In twenty years or so, when we are facing the consequences of having polluted our water sources because of the unrecycled poisons of dead batteries buried under mounds of earth, then these people are going to have to face the difference between their goal (of which I approve entirely) and the reality (which they seem to willfully ignore).
Who are these "campaigners" and who is paying them ?
And could somebody please point me to an official, proven report that demonstrates that we have the capacity to recycle batteries up to 95% ?
Batteries are toxic by nature. Making more is nice (well, except for the child labor and pollution that mining Lithium generates), but recycling them is mandatory when you wear a Green badge.
So where is that report ?
Capitalism, the Word of The Market (aka God) in the USA, is supposed to ensure that the best competitor wins the favor of the consumer.
Except, of course, for the fact that, systematically, a rising competitor always does his damndest to block other competitors and tilt the playing field towards himself. Once that it done, we're no longer in a competitive market, we're subject to a Monopoly where the King of the Market makes whatever decision he wants and the consumer is forced to meekly follow.
We've seen that with Microsoft, we've seen it with Adobe and there are more examples for sure.
And that is one good reason why, despite the shrilly cries of Republicans, we need Government to regulate, target the unjust Kings and set them back to their place : a player in the Market, no more, no less.
Well what else can it be ?
If you want to honestly ensure that only "adults" use a website, then you have to register the identity of all the adults, which is not "protecting the children", but much more "tracking everyone".
I'm not saying that FaceBook/Instagram/Twitter (yes, I know, but I will not change the name) should have some sort of entry barrier for kids (because they should have something else to do withe their lives), but turning The Internet into Big Brother is not the solution.
I'm not saying that I know what the solution is, but this is not it.