Re: reducing the crew cost of operating the plane
On paper, yeah. So, for the beancounters, as usual.
How do you tell the autopilot that there's a crosswind ?
And how does it manage windshear ?
18232 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
A physical description.
From a phone call.
There is no way anyone can infer anything physical from a voice over radio or phone. I cannot begin to count the times have I heard someone's voice on the radio, only to be shocked when I found a pic or a YouTube video featuring that person.
Some people sound younger than they are, some sound much more mature, and being fat or not is not something you can detect by voice alone (let's not even mention height).
Most of the time, the one and only physical trait you can possibly derive just by voice is whether that person is male or female (and even then, it can be tricky).
Short answer : that was a stupid question.
So, they're already lying through their teeth ?
Not only is Borkzilla not including the features that people want and need (aka good performance and no headaches), but it can't be arsed to lay down the rules transparently.
I thank my lucky stars that I don't need to use this shite on a daily basis.
I think it is time for governments and government institutions to realize that it is not because they say it's secure that it is.
Neither is it secure because whoever they contracted to do the job said it is.
And it's especially not secure simply because the contract said it had to be.
It's not secure until a proper security research firm has confirmed that it's secure.
That is 2494 times too many.
Any sane code should control how long it's been since it downloaded that specific data block. If less than 10 minutes, there's absolutely no reason to automatically query it again.
Manually, you do what you want, but automatically you tone it down.
The Internet does not belong to your code.
Okay, I have just one question : what exactly is "water-rich" when mentioned by scientists ?
I understand that it's not you drill a pipe into it and water flows, but much more you mine a cubic meter and squeeze the water out of it.
Okay, fine, but how much water are you going to get out of that cubic meter ?
Because if you only extract one liter, that's a lot of work for not much water.
Sure they will. Because none of them have a smartphone, or each other's number.
This is insane. They're shareholders, they own the company, and you want to tell them how they should make their decisions about it ?
Only in a totalitarian state can you push such nonsense and expect it to work.
But Capitalism doesn't want healthy competition, it wants monopoly and will do everything it can to obtain it.
Capitalism mandates that you block your competition from accessing resources, non-compete clauses accomplish that.
All this talk about healthy competition is just talk. We'll see how well the lobbyists prove that.
No they're not.
The Kool-Aid is still strong on this one. In Luxembourg all of my colleagues are talking about EVs. Luxembourg buys its electricity from Germany because, officially, it doesn't want nuclear energy from France. Never mind that Cattenom is providing nuclear energy to Germany, which is selling it right back to Luxembourg (with a markup, obviously), Luxembourg happily buys its energy from Germany.
Which is building 10 new coal plants because The Greens in Germany have won the war against nuclear.
Well done in any case. All those smug EV owners in Luxembourg can be happy that they've shifted their pollution to somewhere else.
I'm sure that'll work about as well as all those gym club subscriptions.
On the other hand, I'd take one for surviving the zombie apocalypse, gaming in peace from my underground bunker while the shuffling hoards decompose above.
I just need to find a Cheetos dispenser and I'll be good to go . . .
"But as we continued to analyse the results, it appeared that the accuracy was likely due to an effect in statistics called confounding – where models learn other variables which correlate with the true signal, as opposed to the true signal itself"
I'm reminded of that chapter in Asimov's Foundation, where the declarations of some diplomat were passed through a logical analysis procedure to conclude that said diplomat had said absolutely nothing of substance or significance.
I still think we need a tool like that.
Hydrogen sounds like a nice idea, but as usual, when dreams hit reality the truth gets ugly.
And, in case you wish to dismiss just one voice raising concerns, here's another.
One thing is for sure, if hydrogen is indeed the chosen future, once again we're going to need nuclear to make it happen.
No. Just no.
Wind and solar are stopgaps at best. They're unreliable, don't produce enough energy and they create spikes on the grid.
If we are to replace all ICE vehicles with electrical ones, the only power source that can provide the energy to do so reliably is nuclear.
That does not mean that we need to continue with the dangerous reactor needing constant surveillance that we have now. Nuclear can ba safe, especially if we push for Thorium reactors which we should.
But nuclear will not be intermediary. It is the only future.
And ?
If I recall correctly, the Moon is a rather large body (as far as moons go). There's enough space for more than two, unless you're of the "everything is mine" mentality.
The real problem is going to be that, just like petrol on Earth, water is a finite resource on the Moon. It had better be managed better than the Colorado River, else there will be no long-term presence of Man on the Moon.
It was very interesting to learn that this company is the only one in the world to make the equipment that actually makes chips.
Intel, AMD, TSMC, Samsung et al, they all use ASML tools to make their chips.
So cutting China - or anyone else - from accessing ASML tech is basically freezing them where they are in the tech tree.
Not yet a death knell but, as far as militay stuff is concerned, close enough.
"TSMC is drawing comparisons to its N5 process, which is getting on in age, having been deployed in products for more than two years now"
Two years and it's already "getting on" in age ? Really ?
You are aware that Intel is still selling Pentium CPUs, right ? Now that is "getting on" in age.
Let's avoid pushing the hamster wheel even faster, shall we ?
That's easy. The entire financial world is for pointing out the Next Big Opportunity for the Big Guys to make even more trillions of dollars.
Especially since the fool is offering "exclusivity" to Musk, but already quoting tens of thousands of dollars to individual buyers.
Sorry bud, that's not how you do things. If you offer exclusivity to someone, you give a time limit. Only when that limit has passed do you start making quotes for everyone else.
This guy is a rank amateur.
How can you be open and honest if you're using secret laws ?
The only reason we know about the NSA and its egregious abuse of privacy is because of the sacrifice Snowden made.
There is nothing open, much less honest, about how the NSA has grafted itself into everything "Made in USA" (and abroad).
If anyone thinks that The Board at Borkzilla gives a flying fart about gamers I have a bridge to sell them.
You don't spend $66 billion to improve gamers' lives. You do that to increase revenue and do "your duty" to the shareholders.
I don't think that Borkzilla is going to slowly push all those franchises towards the XBox descendants (although I can't see any reason why it wouldn't), but I fail to see what benefit it will do to me.
Competition is supposed to be good, or so I've been told, and this move severely reduces competition.
So, somebody please give me reason to think positive about this (not holding my breath).
I have to say that I've been waiting for this to happen for a long while.
I'm sure there will still be pundits hyping Whatevercoin and blockchain for the foreseeable future ; it's hard to cook the goose when the feathers are so soft - or something like that.
But the fact is that everyone with half a brain can now sit back and run down the checklist of everyone they know who's been singing blockchain praises and wait for the "oh shit" face.
Get the popcorn and start taking notes. This is a time-limited event and you don't want to miss out !
Icon for my "told you so" face -->
Well, it looks like there's room for Oracle (or SAS) to hoover up a cool £50 million over five years, assorted with all the usual promises and below-par delivery.
Oh wait, I was confused with IBM.
Oracle delivers, it's only after delivery that it bleeds you dry in licencing costs.
What is the world coming to ?
It is a well-known fact that, if you as a Westerner wish to create a company in China, you'd better have a nice stack of brown envelopes at the ready, otherwise official approval is curiously going to take much, much longer to be obtained. As in, until you get a clue and start greasing the wheels.
This, however, is the first I've ever heard of a Chinese national railing against such an entrenched habit. Maybe some good will come of it, who knows ?
"when using standard accounting practices"
When you're not using "standard" accounting practices, you're using "non-standard" practices, also known as "cooking the books", a practice which should and will land you in jail if you proceed long enough, so what's the point of that part of the sentence ?