16GB of RAM is the minimum
Sure, you can run on less, but if you want to run Windows comfortably, you need at least 16GB.
And RAM isn't that expensive any more, so there's really no excuse.
18232 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
Diagnostics are not telemetry (at least, I hope Borkzilla still maintains a distinction between the two).
As far as diagnostics are concerned, I have an explanation of the why because I am a developer and have been since 1996 (TLDR : I like diagnostics).
Whenever I write a script that must execute automatically without human intervention (ie at set time intervals), or executes in the background without pestering the user with error messages (because they're just ignored anyway), I want a log of that code's activity. I want to know the start environment, the data in input, the path that the code took and why and, if relevant, what the code sent back as response.
I want that information stored in a repository so I can consult it when (not if) there's a problem in production, because invariably, weeks, months, or even years after I wrote that code, I'm going to get a call to tell me that my code doesn't work anymore and could I fix that. Invariably, I ask what changed and, almost invariably, the answer is "nothing changed, your script is broken".
Yeah, sure, because I wrote chameleon code that overwrites itself. Pull the other one, etc. But you don't say that to the customer, do you ? Not when you're a freelance developer in any case.
So I know I have my logs. I ask permission to go on site and have access to the application. In customer environment, I access said logs and trace the activity back to where it was working properly, then I take the next log and find out, normally rather quickly, where the issue is.
Correcting the issue may be easy, or it may be hard, but I can print out that log and point to it as to why the code isn't working anymore (because you changed the date format of the server, doofus).
That, to me, is diagnostic data. Since I do not go and post that in The CloudTM, it is only accessible on-site and, therefor, as well protected as the client's server is (aka security is not my problem).
What happens after varies and is irrelevant to my point, which is : with logs, I spend at most 15 minutes finding out what went wrong. Without logs, it would take hours, if not days, just to find out what the issue is - especially when the customer doesn't want me accessing production data.
So I like diagnostics. They've saved my bacon (and my time) more times than I care to count, and they make me more efficient.
I'm just hoping that the term means the same thing for Borkzilla.
Following the data available here, a quarter of the US defense budget for 2023 is $236 billion, not $190 billion.
Choosing to compare that to the US defense budget is curious. Yes, the US of A is certainly the country in the world that spends the most on its military (even though it is the least likely to be invaded), but that fact is irrelevant to the discussion.
If you're going by a quarter of the US defense budget, $236 billion is the GDP of Egypt in 2017 (#44 in the list). $190 billion would be Iraq's GDP for the same year (#52).
It's much less sexy to compare global spending to a country's GDP, but I feel it's much more relevant than comparing to the world's single richest country's military spending.
But hey, American aircraft carriers are sexy, I admit.
And they work a lot better than that Russian one, eh Putin ?
And if your government is preoccupied with "sacriligious" web pages, you live in a country I would avoid.
Things that are sacriligious should literally not be hidden, that way the People can educate themselves and form their own opinion.
But of course, a backwards dictatorship is not interested in an educated population - they just want obedient citizens.
Not like our enlightened Western cultures, who just want obedient consumers.
Yes, we all naturally assume that competent people are in charge.
Until we find out that the beancounters had their say.
Well, I'm sure the beancounters are going to have a chance to revise their opinion (not that I'm saying they'll change it, it's too early for April Fool's day).
From this article, it seems to me that RDA is doing its job. Found unwiped sensitive data on auctioned machines that had also been sold to public buyers. It is largely too late to bring in an NDA and, if the goal is to sweep the whole affair under the rug, well a certain Mrs Streisand who certainly like to have a word with that school.
I'm guessing that the New Year came with an updated procedure concerning the printing and manipulation of the end-of-year share certificates.
I'm also guessing that reprinting was not an option for some asinine accounting reason. I can reprint my invoices as often as I like, they don't change number, they don't change total and printing does not impact my customers' accounts.
But hey, this is the 21st century, so . . .
"it's easy to create some knee-jerk legislation which has unintended bad consequences"
As true as that is, it might be time to put an end to the free lunch buffet that companies have been enjoying since the dawn of the Internet. Borkzilla is first in line for never accepting any liability yet is there any count of the man-years that its successive OSes have cost in time and resources ? Of course not.
I am obviously not advocating that the major OS companies be held liable for every Tom, Dick & Harry's multiple issues - they would shut shop immediately and with good reason.
But if we can't have a guarantee that the software works 100% of the time, we should at least have a guarantee that the OS vendor has every verification and control in place to ensure that, at least as far as security is concerned, every possible contingency that has been thought of has been addressed.
Then, of course, it will be the flying circus of clown acts to list all possible contingencies that should bring liability. I'm sure there's quite a list, but not salting and hashing passwords is something that should definitely entail jail time - and for the Board, not for the developers.
". . Apple and Google stifled competition by forcing apps to be distributed through their stores despite secure, safe alternatives being possible, gave preference to their own apps over third-party alternatives and forced developers to deal with a 'slow and opaque' review process"
Not to mention targetting apps that were not only useful but also better than the "official" app (or provided a user-approved service concerning the OS), banning it and then providing an "official" app that did the same thing.
But no matter, the ball is rolling. The wall around the garden is weakening and nothing can stop that.
I wouldn't be surprised, however, if either one of the phone giants is caught poisoning the alternative "secure" stores with malware-infested apps in order to point and say "See ? They're not as secure as we are. Please give us back our monopoly - it's for the good of the suckers consumers".
Indeed. When the Feds are in your flat taking your toys away, it's a bit late to "go out in a blaze of glory".
When the FBI has a warrant on you, you're goose is a good as cooked. Telling porkies like "someone else bought that VPN subscription" is only believable if that someone else was also buying other stuff and you took action to try to stop it. A "someone" who got access to your PayPal account is not going to stop at buying a VPN sub.
As usual, some dumb fuck thought he was on top of the world and, being the pathetic little slimeball that he appears to be, tried to rake in the cash and get an early retirement.
Well he'll get the retirement, but it'll be without the margharitas or the swimming pool blondes.
And he doesn't deserve them.
Finally a service based on Blockchain tech that is a) serious and b) not a scam.
Looking forward to hearing about how said service handles itself in a country of 1+ billion possible users.
That said, it appears to need a thousand servers to handle 240 million ops per second. I have no idea, but I'm guessing that a traditional database platform could handle that amount of activity with considerably less servers - or blockchain.
I wonder what the server environment of the New York Stock Exchange is like ? I'm willing to bet they've got more than 240 million ops per second going on, and, from what I gather, it's pretty well traced as well.
The USA has a lot of empty space within its borders. Or mountains. Shoot it down when it gets over the Rockies, it'll hit a mountain peak nobody is on.
Obviously, if it lands in a city that would be bad, but surely it is possible to know how long it'll take to drop, what speed it's going at and estimate how heavy it is (they've already shot one down, so they have an idea), and calculate the right place to shred the balloon.
Then ban sales of helium to China. It's not like one more item on the list is going to spark WWIII.
Tsk, tsk, tsk. Come now, you're not expecting a backwards, authoritarian government to actually handle things itself, now are you ?
We're talking about some midieval adminitrative busybody. Of course it's up to someone else to deal with the problem and, until it is, said adminitrative busybody from the millennia before last will wield the only thing he (because of course it's a he) knows : the banhammer.
Nice, heavy and comforting in the mind, he will teach a lesson to all those "modern" barbarians : don't fuck with Pakistan.
Well we have no intention of fucking with Pakistan. It can stay in 1491 if it wants.
"We do not agree with the FTC's allegations and we admit no wrongdoing," the company added. "Entering into the settlement allows us to avoid the time and expense of protracted litigation."
Point #1 : You don't need to agree. I'm convinced that every criminal ever arrested by the police disagreed with being arrested. It doesn't matter.
Point #2 : So you admit no wrongdoing ? Doesn't matter either, since you're essentially paying the fine. We know you're guilty.
Point #3 : You're settling because you're guilty and you just want to cut to the chase in order to minimize the impact on the shareholders.
Bottom line : you're guilty as fuck.
Musk is abandoning Hyperloop as a front for his "genius" ?
I'm sure a superapp will cost less, but you need developers and ideas for that - and Musk has neither. It's easy to say that Twitter needs to become everything to everyone, but that's not a game plan, that's just an objective.
Musk is probably berating this objective every day, telling it to "give 150%" and "not leave the building until you're done".
Good luck with that.
And that was back in the naughties, when the CPU was the only thing doing calculations.
To think of what could be achieved in analysis with today's GPUs and their massively parallel threads . . .
The SETI screensaver would just be a blur of colors.
I'm getting goosebumps just thinking about it.
And the answer almost always will be : "Nothing ! We didn't change anything !"
Followed by an extensive waste of time re-auditing the entire network until, hey, what's this ? And then you get a "Oh yeah, we had to modify a setting on the B portion of the network because bla bla, but that couldn't possibly have anything to do with the outage, right ?".
Grrrr.
Lets stop tiptoeing around the subject, shall we ?
All paper submissions must be the original work of Humans.
When monkeys are capable of submitting a scientific paper we can amend that but, until AI actually means what the letters are supposed to stand for in the real world, machines must remain where they are : useful tools and indispensable support for the actual scientific brain.
Ooh, so they've finally found a solution to make blockchain scale (it doesn't) ?
I am thrilled that there are some institutions that are trying to adopt blockchain and finally make this thing useful.
I only find it curious that there are hardly any private companies that are doing this, ie risking actual capital on the idea.
Apart, of course, from all the funny money schemes which almost invariably end up on the bonfire of mismanagement and incompetent IT decisions and staff - not to mention intentional scamming from the get-go.
No, lets let government use our tax money to pursue this bullshit bingo boondoggle. At least, when it won't work, it can just be quietly swept under the rug without much fuss because hey, it's only your tax money at work, right ?
And that will be extremely useful for all the young'uns who have their smartphones grafted to their hands.
Might be an idea to actually get that alert sound out into films that the youngsters watch, because they don't stand much of a chance of recognizing it otherwise.
Ah, the Registry. Created to appease rights holders and integrate DRM into Windows (I'm sure the user base was really clamoring for that). An abomination of an excuse that goes up to and includes allowing miscreants to camouflage their malware.
Too bad Borkzilla didn't stick with config files, ain't it ?
It's been since Windows 95 that we've been lugging this so-called database around, and Borkzilla still hasn't found a way to ensure that its contents don't get screwed up. And when they do, you're good for reinstalling from scratch - even today.
Why don't we have an official verification tool ? How can a key possibly get "damaged" ? Why doesn't Windows automatically detect that and correct the issue by isolating the key ?
Almost three decades now, and Borkzilla still can't answer those questions. And we still have to cope with the fallout.
Pathetic.
What genius decided that that was a good idea ?
Is that a pitiful stab at trying to avoid the cost and hassle of switching the steering to the right side for UK routes ? It's an electric vehicle, don't tell me that you have to redesign the drive shaft.
You're making an EV, not redesiging how people drive.
Because cryptography is hard ?
They coded and salted the hases, which is more than many do today. Not trying to find excuses, but they did better than most already.
You can always do more, especially where security is concerned. Maybe this "no persistent key" approach would break something else, or make everything more difficult ?
Um, no, that's not how you do it.
He was there for the making of those earnings report, so he steps up to the plate and takes responsibility for them.
Then he can step down.
Stepping down before is just demonstrating a lack of professionalism.
No cookie.